Re: [VOTE] 5.3 release candidate (lazy consensus)

2011-10-30 Thread Taha Hafeez Siddiqi
Our applications are already live on 5.3 Taha Hafeez: +1 (non-binding) regards Taha On Oct 28, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > >> I think I'm ready for a release candidate. The only thing that's >> pending for me is the

Re: [VOTE] 5.3 release candidate (lazy consensus)

2011-10-28 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > Just to make sure: we don't plan to actually release the release candidate to > a wider audience, i.e. > outside the staging/snapshot repository, right? If this was going to be an > actual release, we'd have > to do a formal vote. We're in

Re: [VOTE] 5.3 release candidate (lazy consensus)

2011-10-28 Thread Ulrich Stärk
Just to make sure: we don't plan to actually release the release candidate to a wider audience, i.e. outside the staging/snapshot repository, right? If this was going to be an actual release, we'd have to do a formal vote. Uli On 28.10.2011 00:29, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > I think I'm ready fo

Re: [VOTE] 5.3 release candidate (lazy consensus)

2011-10-28 Thread Lenny Primak
OMG that's awesome. I take back whatever bad things everyone else have ever said about you :) On Oct 28, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Lenny Primak wrote: >> I think issues >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1726 >> https://issue

Re: [VOTE] 5.3 release candidate (lazy consensus)

2011-10-28 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Lenny Primak wrote: > I think issues > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1726 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1725 (this may already be fixed) > There you go. All fixed. > should be fixed for the RC. > > > On Oct 27, 2011, at 6:29 PM, How

Re: [VOTE] 5.3 release candidate (lazy consensus)

2011-10-28 Thread Igor Drobiazko
Igor Drobiazko: +1 (binding) On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > I think I'm ready for a release candidate. The only thing that's > pending for me is the very, very elusive byte-code issue that only > ProQuest seems to have stumbled upon. Other than that, the benefits

Re: [VOTE] 5.3 release candidate (lazy consensus)

2011-10-27 Thread Lenny Primak
I think issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1726 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1725 (this may already be fixed) should be fixed for the RC. On Oct 27, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > I think I'm ready for a release candidate. The only thing that's > pen

Re: [VOTE] 5.3 release candidate (lazy consensus)

2011-10-27 Thread Robert Zeigler
I would really love to get in some of the datepicker improvements that have been filed recently, but I won't have time for it in the next week or so, and definitely not this weekend,so they'll have to wait for 5.4! Robert On Oct 27, 2011, at 10/275:29 PM , Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > I think I

Re: [VOTE] 5.3 release candidate (lazy consensus)

2011-10-27 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > I think I'm ready for a release candidate.  The only thing that's > pending for me is the very, very elusive byte-code issue that only > ProQuest seems to have stumbled upon.  Other than that, the benefits > of getting an RC out there n

[VOTE] 5.3 release candidate (lazy consensus)

2011-10-27 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
I think I'm ready for a release candidate. The only thing that's pending for me is the very, very elusive byte-code issue that only ProQuest seems to have stumbled upon. Other than that, the benefits of getting an RC out there now outweighs the benefits of fixing yet more bugs. I do think there