Re: JavaScriptSupport deprecations - Dynamic JavaScript generation?

Try asking the question over in the users mailing list where others may have dealt with similar situations. It’s a discussion worth having. Parameterising options to static JS wrapping Kendo components might be too onerous - I don’t know. The closest I’ve come to it is parameterising for HighCh

Re: JavaScriptSupport deprecations - Dynamic JavaScript generation?

Any additional thoughts regarding alternatives to the AddScript method for JavaScriptSupport? Should I open a new bug report to capture this issue and/or request removal of the AddScript deprecation? -- David Taylor http://www.extensiatech.com On 9/26/2015 10:49 PM, David Taylor wrote: Geoff

Re: JavaScriptSupport deprecations - Dynamic JavaScript generation?

Geoff, Thanks for the 5.3/5.4 comparison links. Seeing non-trivial working examples definitely clarified a few points for me regarding the new approach. The modal dialog example is also very interesting in its own right. Looking at the examples, it seems the new module approach would require

Re: JavaScriptSupport deprecations - Dynamic JavaScript generation?

This may help. Compare these: T5.3: http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart/examples/javascript/javascript T5.4: http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart7/examples/javascript/javas

JavaScriptSupport deprecations - Dynamic JavaScript generation?

Hello, We are working on several Tapestry 5.4 applications that make extensive use of Kendo UI components in addition to the standard Tapestry components. We have created Tapestry components wrapping the Kendo UI components, but see that the JavaScriptSupport methods we are using in setupRend