[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14316787#comment-14316787
]
Tyler Palsulich commented on TIKA-1548:
---
I'm not seeing any mentions in Tika, either
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14316723#comment-14316723
]
Tilman Hausherr commented on TIKA-1548:
---
Sorry, no. We're not setting that one. It is
Wrong thread/list?
Cheers,
Tyler
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Abhinav Gupta
wrote:
> Hi Myrna,
>
> Thanks for the help :) As Bryan had suggested I'm able to execute "ant
> junit-system-mini" and "ant junit-all".
>
> I am new to the open source and somehow I had managed to miss the earlier
>
Can you try installing Java 1.7? I have a hunch Java 1.8 is causing the
issue of not passing tests.
I'm not as experienced with GSOC. But, feel free to comment on the issue
that you're interested. Then, you'll want to come up with a thorough
description of how the Parser will fit into Tika, what t
Hi Myrna,
Thanks for the help :) As Bryan had suggested I'm able to execute "ant
junit-system-mini" and "ant junit-all".
I am new to the open source and somehow I had managed to miss the earlier
replies,which I recently realized while going through the archives at
MarkLogic.
Also I intend to par
Hello Tyler,
Thanks for the link, it makes more sense now :) I wasn't aware of the
archives at marklogic.
I have attached the mvn version [0].
Deleting the files of \.m2 didn't really help.
But executing "mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true install" does work, as Chris had
suggested on Feb 8th (I had m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14316458#comment-14316458
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-1548:
---
Thank you for raising this. I'll look into it. [~til
On 11/02/15 16:03, Tyler Palsulich wrote:
Hi All,
Responses inline.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Allison, Timothy B.
wrote:
I'm working behind a proxy and getting a new proxy error ("proxy
unacknowledged") with r1658847 on tika-server package.
That seems odd... Would adding another plu
Hi All,
Responses inline.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Allison, Timothy B.
wrote:
> I'm working behind a proxy and getting a new proxy error ("proxy
> unacknowledged") with r1658847 on tika-server package.
>
That seems odd... Would adding another pluginRepository cause that?
>
> -Orig
David Pilato created TIKA-1548:
--
Summary: System property added while catching exception on parsing
PDF encrypted doc
Key: TIKA-1548
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1548
Project: Tika
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14316211#comment-14316211
]
Hudson commented on TIKA-1544:
--
SUCCESS: Integrated in tika-trunk-jdk1.7 #485 (See
[https://b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison resolved TIKA-1309.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.8
Fixed on duplicate TIKA-1544 in r1658947. Thank you for th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison resolved TIKA-1544.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.8
added fix similar to that proposed by [~almson] on TIKA-130
I'm working behind a proxy and getting a new proxy error ("proxy
unacknowledged") with r1658847 on tika-server package.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Burch [mailto:apa...@gagravarr.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 6:18 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1658847 -
Maybe move both pluginRepository and plugin execution to profile will help?
--
Best regards,
Konstantin Gribov
Wed Feb 11 2015 at 14:21:12, Nick Burch :
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, tpalsul...@apache.org wrote:
> > +
> > +
> > + miredot
> > + MireDot Releases
> > + http://nexus.q
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, tpalsul...@apache.org wrote:
+
+
+ miredot
+ MireDot Releases
+ http://nexus.qmino.com/content/repositories/miredot
+
+
I'm not sure we're allowed to have other repositories defined in our poms?
We're certainly strongly encouraged not to, as part
16 matches
Mail list logo