[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Coldrick updated TIKA-3742:
---
Attachment: 1264t.dgn
> Advice around DGN7 parser and whether to add to TIKA
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17530457#comment-17530457
]
Dan Coldrick edited comment on TIKA-3742 at 4/30/22 9:32 PM:
-
Is this correct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17530457#comment-17530457
]
Dan Coldrick edited comment on TIKA-3742 at 4/30/22 9:32 PM:
-
Is this correct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17530457#comment-17530457
]
Dan Coldrick commented on TIKA-3742:
Is this correct for working out the deletion? If it is I might
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17530448#comment-17530448
]
Dan Coldrick commented on TIKA-3742:
Hi [~nick]
I'm struggling, I can see there are deletes which I
That's exactly my understanding as well. That test is not flaky in 2x
because of modifications I made to the integration tests in 2x.
In 2x, the Solr tests can be flaky, and there's an open issue for
that. I don't like flaky tests. Sorry.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 6:28 AM Tilman Hausherr
Hi Tim
Thanks for a quick fix, missed your answer yesterday, will check soon
and let you know.
Cheers Sergey
On Fri 29 Apr 2022, 16:49 Tim Allison, wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
> That the thumbnail file name showed up in the stream is a bug I
> introduced in 2.3.x. I missed it in the fix in 2.4.0
Now I had successful builds with jdk11 and jdk18. I think this is more a
problem with the test than with the software. I remember when I started
with tika I wanted to make it possible to have tika1 and 2 work in
parallel and never managed to do it and then moved on to other things.
Something
I have seen that test flake out. I’ll take a look on Monday.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 5:30 AM Tilman Hausherr
wrote:
> [ERROR] Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 2, Time elapsed:
> 102.543 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> org.apache.tika.server.TikaServerIntegrationTest
> [ERROR]
>
[ERROR] Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 2, Time elapsed:
102.543 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.tika.server.TikaServerIntegrationTest
[ERROR]
org.apache.tika.server.TikaServerIntegrationTest.testSameServerIdAfterOOM
Time elapsed: 5.694 s <<< ERROR!
Am 30.04.2022 um 11:08 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
Me, I did a successful build yesterday with jdk8 (oracle) and now with
jdk11 (oracle) on Windows 10. However there are frequent build fails
on the CI for jdk11 and jdk 17.
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/tika/job/tika-branch1x-jdk11/170/
Am 30.04.2022 um 10:32 schrieb David Meikle:
Everything looks good (sigs, etc) and has build and tests fine for me in
Ubuntu 22.04 (Java 11 and 17) but is failing on Windows 11 (Java 11).
The test that is
failing TikaServerIntegrationTest.testSameServerIdAfterOOM() is consistent
in Maven build
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 at 15:55, Tim Allison wrote:
> A candidate for the Tika 1.28.2 release is available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/1.28.2
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> https://github.com/apache/tika/tree/1.28.2-rc2/
>
> The SHA-512
Hi
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 00:23, Tim Allison wrote:
>
> The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is
>
> aff68637527fa4fa1ec21678ef2771a1dcd5eb3944bc1b1171c59459274295b903e093dc63ade0b6532bf137834d32bcb9cdf0d6a32efca187b9d6b8ac64f690.
>
> In addition, a staged maven repository is available here:
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
