Re: [DISCUSS] support for Java 8?

2022-03-25 Thread Luís Filipe Nassif
sensible -> sensitive Em sex, 25 de mar de 2022 21:15, Luís Filipe Nassif escreveu: > We are moving to java 11 because it's required by Lucene 9, that has some > features we are interested in. > > We use TIKA as a library, using ForkParser to protect against catastrophic > errors. And we are rec

Re: [DISCUSS] support for Java 8?

2022-03-25 Thread Luís Filipe Nassif
We are moving to java 11 because it's required by Lucene 9, that has some features we are interested in. We use TIKA as a library, using ForkParser to protect against catastrophic errors. And we are receiving a lot of illegal reflective access warnings because of some Tika dependencies, although t

Re: [DISCUSS] support for Java 8?

2022-03-25 Thread Konstantin Gribov
Hi, folks. I'm +1 to moving to jdk11. Even some distros dropping 1.8 lately so I don't have strong points against letting 11 be minimal version. We use mix of 11 as target and 11+17 as runtime with 1.8 for some legacy applications like Nexus OSS. I'm interested to know how much of our downstream

Re: [DISCUSS] support for Java 8?

2022-03-25 Thread Eric Pugh
If Java 11 makes life easier, then shipping it for Tika 2 would make sense to me. Java 8 is well….old…. > On Mar 25, 2022, at 12:04 PM, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > > Weak +1 for keeping java 8 because it's long term supported by Oracle. > Tilman > > Am 25.03.2022 um 15:46 schrieb Tim Alliso

Re: [DISCUSS] support for Java 8?

2022-03-25 Thread Tilman Hausherr
Weak +1 for keeping java 8 because it's long term supported by Oracle. Tilman Am 25.03.2022 um 15:46 schrieb Tim Allison: All, I'm somewhat interested in moving to require Java 11 to clean up some dependency stuff. This is not a burning need. I wanted to get a sense from our community. Do

Re: [DISCUSS] support for Java 8?

2022-03-25 Thread Nicholas DiPiazza
I've been not adding it unless I actually add something, because Oracle committed to several more years of JDK8 support. So I'd only add it if we want something, like the proc manager for pipes maybe? On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:46 AM Tim Allison wrote: > All, > I'm somewhat interested in moving

RE: [DISCUSS] support for Java 8?

2022-03-25 Thread Julien Massiera
Hi Tim, from our side we already dropped java 8 and only support java 11, so it would not be a problem for us Cheers, Julien -Message d'origine- De : Tim Allison Envoyé : vendredi 25 mars 2022 15:47 À : Objet : [DISCUSS] support for Java 8? All, I'm somewhat int

[DISCUSS] support for Java 8?

2022-03-25 Thread Tim Allison
All, I'm somewhat interested in moving to require Java 11 to clean up some dependency stuff. This is not a burning need. I wanted to get a sense from our community. Do we still need to support 8? If so, for how long? Cheers, Tim