Ok thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2014, at 1:35 PM, "Tyler Palsulich" wrote:
>> Commit it to trunk and then yes
> Already in there (thanks, Nick!).
>Commit it to trunk and then yes
Already in there (thanks, Nick!).
gt;
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: , Chris Mattmann
>> Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
>> Date: Sunday, August 31, 2014 12:37 PM
>> To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candida
++
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: , Chris Mattmann
> Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
> Date: Sunday, August 31, 2014 12:37 PM
> To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika
, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++
-Original Message-
From: , Chris Mattmann
Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Date: Sunday, August 31, 2014 12:37 PM
To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika
, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++
-Original Message-
From: , Chris Mattmann
Date: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:29 AM
To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1
>Guys, bas
Nick Burch [mailto:apa...@gagravarr.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:06 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> On a related note, I did some digging on the one regression I found in
> the ppt
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
On a related note, I did some digging on the one regression I found in
the pptx, and that will be solved if we wait for POI 3.11 beta 1. I
haven't yet had a chance to rerun on the random sample with the updated
POI...
I'm currently on a train
ssage-
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 2:30 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1
Guys, based on all the comments here, I am going to roll another
RC #2 to address:
- Tyler's com
Another quick thought on the artifiacts in
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-1.6/rc1/ - as well as
needing to ditch original-tika-app.jar, shouldn't we have the Tika
Server standalone jar in there too as another released + easily
downloadable jar?
Thanks
Nick
On 28/07/14 05:22,
;
>
>
>
>-Original Message-----
>From: Sergey Beryozkin
>Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
>Date: Monday, July 28, 2014 11:38 AM
>To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1
>
>>+0 given that
Hi All,
After the recent NPE that Chris found (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1378), we should roll an RC#2.
Tyler
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
>
>> A candidate for the Tika 1.6 release is available at:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
A candidate for the Tika 1.6 release is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-1.6/rc1/
Should original-tika-app-1.6.jar be in there? IIRC we decided in the 1.5
release that it shouldn't be
Please vote on releasing
Hi
On 29/07/14 13:14, Nick Burch wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
This is not an issue that should block the release, I was careful not
to vote with a minus one. I've become a bit impatient, but no one
really blocks me from completing this pure documentation effort
myself, I w
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
There was one regression:
http://digitalcorpora.org/corp/nps/files/govdocs1/268/268620.pptx
Stacktrace:
Caused by: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of
range: -369073454
at java.lang.String.checkBounds(String.java
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
This is not an issue that should block the release, I was careful not to
vote with a minus one. I've become a bit impatient, but no one really
blocks me from completing this pure documentation effort myself, I was
hoping that someone would do it firs
geles, CA 90089 USA
++
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin
Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Date: Monday, July 28, 2014 3:16 PM
To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 releas
ngeles, CA 90089 USA
++
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin
Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Date: Monday, July 28, 2014 11:38 AM
To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release
.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1
>+0 given that it appears that the tika-parsers dependencies
>documentation issue has been pushed away. I'm getting confused why.
>
>Thanks. Sergey
>
>[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-13
+0 given that it appears that the tika-parsers dependencies
documentation issue has been pushed away. I'm getting confused why.
Thanks. Sergey
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1367
On 28/07/14 17:16, Tyler Palsulich wrote:
+1
OSX 10.9.3, Java 1.7
Tyler
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 a
+1
OSX 10.9.3, Java 1.7
Tyler
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Allison, Timothy B.
wrote:
> +1
>
> Linux version 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64: Java 1.6 and 1.7
> Windows 7, Java 1.7
>
> I also ran Tika 1.5 and 1.6 rc1 against a random selection of 10,000 docs
> (all formats) plus all available m
+1
Linux version 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64: Java 1.6 and 1.7
Windows 7, Java 1.7
I also ran Tika 1.5 and 1.6 rc1 against a random selection of 10,000 docs (all
formats) plus all available msoffice-x files in govdocs1, yielding 10,413 docs.
There were several improvements in text extraction for
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.6.
Tested on the following systems:
1. Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise, SP 1, x64-based PC
2. Linux ubuntu 3.11.0-24-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux
Thanks,
Oleg
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl
23 matches
Mail list logo