Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/412
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/413
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15496120#comment-15496120
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1442:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15496118#comment-15496118
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1442:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
Going back to the dual PRs i referenced:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/412
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/413
After a few days of review, I noticed this morning that now that they were
ready for merge, they were conflicted. That means some extra steps because
if I had:
git c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1442.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2.3
> Killing session should make better
Hey Kuppitz,
Thank you for this. These are very nice additions.
In general people, one of the best things you can do to help is add little
snippet PRs to our docs.
“This example doesn’t show the full power of this step, I’ll add
another example.”
“I think there should be more v
Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/418#discussion_r79189025
--- Diff:
gremlin-python/src/main/jython/gremlin_python/structure/io/graphson.py ---
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ class NumberSerializer(GraphSONSerializer):
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1330.
-
> by()-modulation for where()
> ---
>
> Ke
Github user leifurhauks commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/418#discussion_r79199796
--- Diff:
gremlin-python/src/main/jython/gremlin_python/structure/io/graphson.py ---
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ class NumberSerializer(GraphSONSerializer):
This issue was created a while back:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1076
It presents an option to allow running of a single test in the
structure/process test suite. The solution is beyond anything anyone will
ever do in TinkerPop 3.x (a massive body of work) as it means restruct
GitHub user dkuppitz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/425
Fixed behavior of has() methods
Made `has[Id|Label|Key|Value]` compatible with the old varargs method
signature and added tests to ensure the compatibility.
VOTE: +1
You can merge this
Hello,
I've recently changes the signatures of our has() methods. Unfortunately I
didn't realize that this change was breaking for some users (those who
arrays as arguments). The old method signatures were all vararg-based:
- hasId(Object... ids)
- hasLabel(Object... labels)
- etc.
...a
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/425
Please adapt your "INFO" email to dev into the Upgrade Docs. I think it's
important to explain the history of what happened here for 3.2.3 as we missed
the change for the Upgrade Docs in 3.2.2.
We're hanging around 250 open issues at the moment in JIRA. 28 of those are
"deprecation" issues, so roughly 220 to pay attention to. It's been a while
since we've done any global grooming of the list and I think that as we are
on the way to 3.3.0, it would be good to do a little bit of that.
In t
GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/426
TINKERPOP-1437 Added tests for dedup(Scope,String...) overload in DedupTest
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1437
Pretty simple - just added a couple of tests - but didn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15497263#comment-15497263
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1437:
---
GitHub user spmallette opened a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1095:
Summary: Create a custom ScriptContext (was: Determine if a custom
ScriptContex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1031.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
I don't think this is a good idea anymore. We don't really h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15497302#comment-15497302
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-932:
I sense that barring some obsc
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/426#discussion_r79258319
--- Diff:
gremlin-test/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/filter/DedupTest.java
---
@@ -73,6 +77,40 @@
public
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/426#discussion_r79258254
--- Diff:
gremlin-test/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/filter/DedupTest.java
---
@@ -73,6 +77,40 @@
public
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/426#discussion_r79258124
--- Diff:
gremlin-test/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/filter/DedupTest.java
---
@@ -241,6 +279,16 @@ public void g_V_both
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/426#discussion_r79258468
--- Diff:
gremlin-test/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/filter/DedupTest.java
---
@@ -73,6 +77,40 @@
public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15497514#comment-15497514
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1437:
---
Github user okram commented on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15497516#comment-15497516
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1437:
---
Github user okram commented on
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/426
Made a few comments to ensure your test code is consistent with the others.
Besides minor cosmetics -- VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15497517#comment-15497517
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1437:
---
Github user okram commented on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15497515#comment-15497515
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1437:
---
Github user okram commented on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15497523#comment-15497523
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1437:
---
Github user okram commented on
30 matches
Mail list logo
