Re: failing optional and order by gremlin

OK got it. Thanks for the help. Cheers, Pieter On 11/02/2017 16:46, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > This looks like a bug in 3.2.3. It's clearly expected to fail, since by() > modulators should always fail if the traverser can't emit a value. What you > actually want to do is this: > > gremlin>

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1630) Consider adding by(Object value)

Daniel Kuppitz created TINKERPOP-1630: - Summary: Consider adding by(Object value) Key: TINKERPOP-1630 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1630 Project: TinkerPop Issue

Re: failing optional and order by gremlin

This looks like a bug in 3.2.3. It's clearly expected to fail, since by() modulators should always fail if the traverser can't emit a value. What you actually want to do is this: gremlin> g.traversal().V(a1.id()).optional( ..1> outE("ab").as("e").otherV().as("vb").optional( ..2>

RE: failing optional and order by gremlin

Hi, The following query no longer works on 3.2.4 @Test public void testOptionalWithOrderBy() { final TinkerGraph g = TinkerGraph.open(); Vertex a1 = g.addVertex(T.label, "A", "name", "a1"); Vertex b1 = g.addVertex(T.label, "B", "name", "b1"); Vertex b2 =

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

website passes linkchecker. my app passes all tests. VOTE +1 Robert Dale On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > i think it's on schedule still. pieter sounded like he needed a little > extra time, but given the nature of the issue he described it