Hi Stephen,
Thanks for your valuable comments, which certainly changed my view on
this matter.
First, I only intended to "recipe test in the doc environment" against
the vanilla Apache Hadoop; the commercial providers can cater for
themselves. I was not clear on that one.
Secondly, I was n
Github user okram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/f68b36c44ee7febfa2b2698889c977b11a3e8f49#commitcomment-22955008
Its also going to need to be registered with Gremlin-Python. However, lets
wait to do that as we are about to push a major update
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1714:
---
Summary: Gremlin Server scriptEvaluationTimeout should take into
account request arrival time
Key: TINKERPOP-1714
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16076762#comment-16076762
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-915:
--
Github user krlohnes commented on
Github user krlohnes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/618
@spmallette I hadn't seen that failure before, but that was from a pretty
recent change, ya? I don't think I was up to date with `upstream/tp32`. At any
rate, I've rebased the branch on my fork.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16076624#comment-16076624
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1706:
---
GitHub user spmallette opened a
GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/655
TINKERPOP-1706 ScriptEngine related deprecation removal
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1706
Pretty simple and straightforward - these were mostly internal
classes/fie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16076616#comment-16076616
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1682:
---
Github user okram commented on
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/621
I just noticed that this strategy is not registered with the GraphSON and
Gryo serializers accordingly. Thus, back to VOTE 0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16076571#comment-16076571
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-915:
--
Github user spmallette commented o
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/618
I fixed the broken test on tp32. I guess this needs to be rebased again.
Not sure how that failing test snuck through reviewkinda odd
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
I did see that - I was wondering if anyone would try to convert that into
TinkerPop documentation of some sort. I'll save my less positive comments
for the end and first just say what you could do if everyone is into this
idea. You could add it to the "Implementation Recipes" subsection of the
"Rec
Hi Stephen,
I recently posted recipes on the gremlin and janusgraph users lists to
configure the binary distributions to work with a spark-yarn cluster. I
think it would be useful to have the tinkerpop recipe included in Apache
Tinkerpop repo itself in the following way:
- include the spark
13 matches
Mail list logo
