[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16404666#comment-16404666
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1926:
-
I'm not sure what in your e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1926:
Component/s: build-release
> Cannot build a project locally
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16404666#comment-16404666
]
stephen mallette edited comment on TINKERPOP-1926 at 3/19/18 11:38 AM:
-
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/819
Thanks for taking a look at our build. Unfortunately, this kind of change
can't really be considered as part of just a pull requeswt. we'd need
significant community discussion about (1) whethe
GitHub user javeme opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/821
TINKERPOP-1914 Support construct a GremlinServer instance from gremlin
executor service
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1914
This constructor is useful when Gremlin Server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16404712#comment-16404712
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1914:
---
GitHub user javeme opened a pul
Github user javeme commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/813
@spmallette Thanks for reminding, I already re-target to the `tp33` branch:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/821
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16404716#comment-16404716
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1914:
---
Github user javeme commented on
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/817
@FlorianHockmann I rebased and now the tests are failing (with and without
your suggested changes) - i assume this has something to do with the lambda
work that just merged - any ideas?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16404778#comment-16404778
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1920:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/817#discussion_r175433699
--- Diff: gremlin-dotnet/glv/P.template ---
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ namespace Gremlin.Net.Process.Traversal
<% } %><% pmethods.findAll{ it in ["with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16404801#comment-16404801
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1920:
---
Github user FlorianHockmann com
Github user jorgebay commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/817#discussion_r175434403
--- Diff: gremlin-dotnet/glv/P.template ---
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ namespace Gremlin.Net.Process.Traversal
<% } %><% pmethods.findAll{ it in ["within", "w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16404805#comment-16404805
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1920:
---
Github user jorgebay commented
Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/817#discussion_r175440928
--- Diff: gremlin-dotnet/glv/P.template ---
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ namespace Gremlin.Net.Process.Traversal
<% } %><% pmethods.findAll{ it in ["within",
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16404834#comment-16404834
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1920:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/817
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1920.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: stephen mallette
> Tests fail because P.Within()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16404936#comment-16404936
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1920:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1892.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: stephen mallette
> GLV test failures for .NET
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1913:
Component/s: server
python
javascript
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/821
VOTE: +1
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16404958#comment-16404958
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1914:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
Sounds like we have no objections to remove Giraph for 3.4.0 on the dev
list. I'm going to open up discussion further now on the user channels and
see what happens:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gremlin-users/VOLQT-oSCos/MUEDFFGpBAAJ
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote:
> I agr
See https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/819.
1) Are there any objections to using error-prone compiler instead of
OpenJDK's javac compiler?
2) Stephen raised the question, that Tinkerpop project may better use
another static analysis tool instead of error-prone. I have to answer that
no stati
Some changes look good others look wrong evident by the failed builds. I
think any proposed changes would be separate PRs and reviewed on a
case-by-case basis. As for making it the default compiler, I think this
would be a profile, disabled by default, at best at least until a time it
can be mass
26 matches
Mail list logo
