Re: [DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

2022-01-18 Thread Stephen Mallette
Announcements are made for freezing/reopening here on the dev list - that's about it I'm afraid. Generally speaking, branches are re-opened after release automatically but the release manager still needs to bump to SNAPSHOT on the branch. It's usually at that point the branch is officially reopened

Re: [DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

2022-01-18 Thread Øyvind Sæbø
Do we have an overview anywhere of which branches are frozen at any given time? I have been assuming branches were automatically opened once their releases were done, but I see now that that is not necessarily the case😅 Searching through the mailing list to figure out which branches are frozen can

Re: [DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

2022-01-18 Thread Stephen Mallette
There's a fair bit of work happening on 3.5-dev right now. It's probably best to not slow down anyone's momentum on that to hold 3.5-dev frozen. If we have to do a small 3.5.3 release alongside 3.6.0 to ensure functional parity I guess that's fine. I think we can reopen 3.5-dev again. Please let me

Re: [DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

2022-01-05 Thread Stephen Mallette
Hi folks, I've been away for a bit during the holiday but back now thinking about this release. The issue for 3.4-dev that made me want to hold release was resolved. The fix had nothing to do with the code itself and more to do with the fact that memory requirements for the tests we'd added over th

Re: [DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

2021-12-29 Thread Stephen Mallette
I think we will need to take a bit of a delay on the code freeze for this Friday. 3.4-dev is unstable in CI - i've been trying to get to the root of the problem for a week now and it's still not completely resolved. That's prevented me from looking at other issues I wanted to get done and I think t

Re: [DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

2021-12-13 Thread Stephen Mallette
In the worst case, if there were things we wanted added to 3.6.0 that weren't quite ready for code freeze we could release 3.5.2 and hold the freeze on its branch while 3.6.0 finished. I just wouldn't want a 3.6.0 to force a few commits into a fast turnaround release of 3.5.3. That might give some

Re: [DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

2021-12-13 Thread Kelvin Lawrence
The work for adding a regex TextP is sitting on the TINKERPOP-2652 branch. I still need to write the docs and add one last Java test but otherwise it's close to PR ready. I would like to try and get that into 3.6 which I think I should be able to do before the cutoff. In general capturing what w

Re: [DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

2021-12-13 Thread Stephen Mallette
no - not yet fixed, but not forgotten. i'd consider that a blocker for release. maybe i can do that today. On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:45 AM Divij Vaidya wrote: > Hey Stephen > > Did we fix > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1502#issuecomment-983549704 yet? > I > would suggest that we fix

Re: [DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

2021-12-13 Thread Divij Vaidya
Hey Stephen Did we fix https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1502#issuecomment-983549704 yet? I would suggest that we fix this known bug in a change we are about to release for the sake of releasing a stable build. Regards, Divij Vaidya On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 1:44 PM Stephen Mallette wrot

[DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

2021-12-13 Thread Stephen Mallette
I'd like to propose we do a release for the new year, with code freeze starting conveniently on Friday December 31. I think we should also consider making this the last release of 3.4.x. It occurred to me that 3.6.x doesn't have a name yet. Working in reverse (never done it this way before), I ha