Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

13 PM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 > > sure - please put that in the prefix of the PR title so it links back to > that original jira ticket > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Paul A. Jackson <paul.jack...@pb.com> > wrote: &g

RE: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

OK, that's done, as you can no doubt see. Hoping this can make it into 3.2.4. Thanks. -Paul -Original Message- From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 6:13 PM To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 sure

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

> > > > > > OK, low-risk PR coming for OLTP part. Should I reuse TINKERPOP-1589? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Paul > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

t; > > -Paul > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 5:07 PM > > > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

t; > > -Original Message- > > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 5:07 PM > > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 > > > > Being as close as we are to our code

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

t; -Original Message- > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 5:07 PM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 > > Being as close as we are to our code freeze/test week, I'd say that

RE: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

OK, low-risk PR coming for OLTP part. Should I reuse TINKERPOP-1589? Thanks, -Paul -Original Message- From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 5:07 PM To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 Being as close

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

gt; > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:58 PM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 > > in his case, it should go to tp32. > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at

RE: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:58 PM To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 in his case, it should go to tp32. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Paul A. Jackson <paul.jack...@pb.com> wrote: > For what branch should a pull request be

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

y, January 25, 2017 3:41 PM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 > > I went with the most obvious implementation place for CloseableIterator. > If you see other spots where you could make an argument that it would make > sense to add it the

RE: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

For what branch should a pull request be submitted? -Original Message- From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:41 PM To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 I went with the most obvious implementation

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

January 24, 2017 3:01 PM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 > > Great. I'll try it out. > > -Paul > > > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 2:54 PM

RE: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

it also make the same check for CloseableIterator and call close(). Thoughts? -Paul -Original Message- From: Paul A. Jackson [mailto:paul.jack...@pb.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 3:01 PM To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 Great. I'll try

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

no - it's in 3.2.4 and merged forward to 3.3.0: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/e3889bf2401b42c3afbc85eabc2fbcebf2588974/gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/structure/util/CloseableIterator.java On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Paul A. Jackson

RE: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

Is CloseableIterator only in the 3.3 branch? -Paul -Original Message- From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 9:58 AM To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 It's been a while since we've had a release (October

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

Thanks, Jason - we can do a hangout and work through it on release day. that seemed to work well when i did it with ted. You would need to get your environment setup for release, the important/annoying part being related to getting keys/gpg stuff all settled. I sorta have this sketched out in some

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

Thanks Ted - any takers for 3.2.4? I'd be happy to do it with someone if there is interest in learning the process. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > Code freeze Friday sounds good to me. Yes, I'll be submitting a PR for the > PathRetractionStrategy bugs

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

Code freeze Friday sounds good to me. Yes, I'll be submitting a PR for the PathRetractionStrategy bugs (1583 & 1597). I can take the 3.1.6 release. --Ted On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > @Ted — Do you think you can fix the PathRetractionStrategy

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

@Ted — Do you think you can fix the PathRetractionStrategy bugs for this release, please? Marko. http://markorodriguez.com > On Jan 23, 2017, at 7:57 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > > It's been a while since we've had a release (October 2016) and given the > importance