Re: svn commit: r493480 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common/ChannelSocket.java

2007-01-07 Thread Peter Rossbach
I agree with you, but at apache takeover the backlog can be helpfull, and default is 0 as before. Regards Peter Am 07.01.2007 um 00:15 schrieb Bill Barker: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ok, this is hella confusing. :) the AJP is

Re: svn commit: r493480 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common/ChannelSocket.java

2007-01-07 Thread Takayuki Kaneko
Hi all, IMHO, it is useful that we can set the backlog on AJP connector. Because mod_jk 1.2.19 or later has DisableReuse option. In previous versions, Tomcat had to be set the maxThreads lager than Apache's MaxClients. So, Tomcat's threads were excessive. I expect that Tomcat will be able to

Re: svn commit: r493480 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common/ChannelSocket.java

2007-01-07 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
in addition to that, shouldn;t the property be named acceptCount to match the other connectors? Filip Takayuki Kaneko wrote: Hi all, IMHO, it is useful that we can set the backlog on AJP connector. Because mod_jk 1.2.19 or later has DisableReuse option. In previous versions, Tomcat had to

Re: svn commit: r493480 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common/ChannelSocket.java

2007-01-07 Thread Bill Barker
Takayuki Kaneko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, IMHO, it is useful that we can set the backlog on AJP connector. Because mod_jk 1.2.19 or later has DisableReuse option. In previous versions, Tomcat had to be set the maxThreads lager than Apache's

Re: svn commit: r493480 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common/ChannelSocket.java

2007-01-07 Thread Tim Whittington
This is one of the major problems with the current JK implementation If web server threads, JK worker connection_pool_size and AJP maxThreads don't all match, then you can get (silently) dropped connections. If you configure it so you don't, then you've got very large numbers of connections (and

Re: Script for publishing JARs to Maven Repo done

2007-01-07 Thread Paul McMahan
On 1/5/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll add this patch in, that's not a problem, we've already identified Thank you. So if you are integrating TC6, I hope you are not doing it the same way they did TC5.5, we've received complaints about that integration, about the

svn commit: r493861 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/KEYS

2007-01-07 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Jan 7 14:06:06 2007 New Revision: 493861 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=493861 Log: Adding signing key of guenter knauf. He provides signed Netware binaries for mod_jk. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/KEYS Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/KEYS URL:

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2007/01/07]

2007-01-07 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2007/01/07]

2007-01-07 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Watchdog [2007/01/07]

2007-01-07 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2007/01/07]

2007-01-07 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned