Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: I am ok with changing the release process if something simpler is possible. I am interested in speeding up the process by cutting back on the number of votes. The process would be: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/

Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

You are right. Jim Jagielski wrote: On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: I can't test on HP-UX, but maybe you (jfc) could try: -#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN) && !defined(HPUX11) +#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN) &&

[VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

Hi, I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing 3. wait 2-3 days for testing 4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build 5. 3 +1's late

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: > > 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on > people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 > 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing > 3. wait 2-3 days for testing > 4. call for alpha/bet

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing 3. wait 2-3 days for testing 4. call for alpha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41535] - IIS 6+JK 1.2.0+Tomcat 5.5.20 web app FORM based auth hangs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2007/02/04]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2007/02/04]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Watchdog [2007/02/04]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2007/02/04]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

Hi, I have tested, AC_CHECK_HEADERS() does not help: +++ checking sys/socketvar.h usability... no checking sys/socketvar.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: sys/socketvar.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/socketvar.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: