Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 5.5.35 Build

2012-01-09 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/06/2012 09:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: [X] Stable My tests are passing. Cheers Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52440] New: Wrong getValueReference behaviour with Facelets parameter expressions

2012-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52440 Bug #: 52440 Summary: Wrong getValueReference behaviour with Facelets parameter expressions Product: Tomcat 7 Version: 7.0.22 Platform: PC Status: NEW

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 5.5.35 Build

2012-01-09 Thread Rainer Jung
Now finally my vote :) On 06.01.2012 21:19, Jim Jagielski wrote: The builds for Tomcat 5.5.35 are ready for testing and approval. The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/ According to the release process, the 5.5.35 build corresponding to the tag

Re: problem using default Realm in new unit tests

2012-01-09 Thread Brian Burch
On 06/01/12 11:47, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2012/1/6 Brian Burchbr...@pingtoo.com: I am developing some new unit tests to validate SingleSignOn and Authenticator logic. I have used this existing test class as my template: org.apache.catalina.authenticator.TestDigestAuthenticator .. which

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52443] New: Tomcat#defaultRealm shares Realm instance between web applications, resulting in INFO log message from lifecycle

2012-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443 Bug #: 52443 Summary: Tomcat#defaultRealm shares Realm instance between web applications, resulting in INFO log message from lifecycle Product: Tomcat 7

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52443] Tomcat#defaultRealm shares Realm instance between web applications, resulting in INFO log message from lifecycle

2012-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443 --- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2012-01-09 16:48:29 UTC --- One more: Assigning explicit defaultRealm in Tomcat.addWebapp() prevents us from assign a realm to Engine. Because of the Realm created in

Re: problem using default Realm in new unit tests

2012-01-09 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/1/9 Brian Burch br...@pingtoo.com: On 06/01/12 11:47, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2012/1/6 Brian Burchbr...@pingtoo.com: I am developing some new unit tests to validate SingleSignOn and Authenticator logic. I have used this existing test class as my template:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52444] New: Classloading-based ServletContainerInitializer @HandlesTypes processing can result in long startup times

2012-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444 Bug #: 52444 Summary: Classloading-based ServletContainerInitializer @HandlesTypes processing can result in long startup times Product: Tomcat 7 Version:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52326] Lower log level for failed class loading

2012-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52326 --- Comment #7 from Chris Beams cbe...@gmail.com 2012-01-09 17:13:57 UTC --- I just created bug 52444 to capture the request to move away from classloading when processing @HandlesTypes. -- Configure bugmail:

Re: VERIFIED status in Bugzilla (was: [Bug 41697]...)

2012-01-09 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/1/8 bugzi...@apache.org: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41697 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:           What    |Removed                     |Added             Status|VERIFIED        

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52440] Wrong getValueReference behaviour with Facelets parameter expressions

2012-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52440 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS/Version||All

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52444] Classloading-based ServletContainerInitializer @HandlesTypes processing can result in long startup times

2012-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |enhancement ---

Re: ant build failing: could not find file modules/jdbc-pool/doc/jdbc-pool.xml to copy

2012-01-09 Thread S Ahmed
Agreed. The file was building.txt not readme sorry, thanks for the tips. So any help on importing the project into eclipse? On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.comwrote: 2012/1/9 S Ahmed sahmed1...@gmail.com: Well the readme said it may fail on mac osx

svn commit: r1229307 - /tomcat/trunk/build.xml

2012-01-09 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Mon Jan 9 19:17:34 2012 New Revision: 1229307 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1229307view=rev Log: Further improve Fix for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52237 Make usefile flag of junit formatter configurable as well. The default value is true.

svn commit: r1229314 - in /tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk: ./ build.xml webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2012-01-09 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Mon Jan 9 19:22:06 2012 New Revision: 1229314 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1229314view=rev Log: Merged revision 1229307 from tomcat/trunk: Further improve Fix for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52237 Make usefile flag of junit formatter

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52237] build.xml file improvement to allow not just plaintext junit logs.

2012-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52237 --- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2012-01-09 19:25:11 UTC --- With r1229314 I added one more configurable property to this: junit.formatter.usefile It will be in 7.0.24 as well. -- Configure bugmail:

Re: unit test debugging under Netbeans

2012-01-09 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/1/5 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2011/12/30 Brian Burch br...@pingtoo.com: Formatter is configurable since 7.0.24. Silly me! A ${test.formatter} property is defined immediately after ${test.name}! The test.formatter configures logging library (or specifically

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-trunk-test (in module tomcat-trunk) failed

2012-01-09 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/1/9 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2012/1/7 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de: Maybe enable the accesslog during testing with test.accesslog=true, so one can check after the next failure whether the contents agree with your assumption. Not sure, whether Gump offers access

Re: problem using default Realm in new unit tests

2012-01-09 Thread Brian Burch
Konstantin, Thank you for your prompt and helpful response... at least I know I haven't overlooked something simple. With your encouragement, I'm happy to keep fighting the alligators until I can get back to draining the swamp! On 10/01/12 02:56, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2012/1/9 Brian

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52445] New: Methodexpression with arguments fails on nested properties

2012-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445 Bug #: 52445 Summary: Methodexpression with arguments fails on nested properties Product: Tomcat 7 Version: 7.0.23 Platform: PC Status: NEW

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test (in module tomcat-7.0.x) failed

2012-01-09 Thread Bill Barker
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-trunk-test (in module tomcat-trunk) failed

2012-01-09 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/1/10 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2012/1/9 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2012/1/7 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de: Maybe enable the accesslog during testing with test.accesslog=true, so one can check after the next failure whether the contents agree with