Thanks Jean-Frederic for your clarification.
I'll look into this one as well.
Regards,
Rajeev
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:47 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 03/22/2010 05:40 AM, Rajeev Sampath wrote:
> > Thanks Mark for your reply.
> >
> > Though it's not mandatory, if it's going to be usef
On 03/22/2010 05:40 AM, Rajeev Sampath wrote:
> Thanks Mark for your reply.
>
> Though it's not mandatory, if it's going to be useful, then I'll continue
> working on it and prepare a proposal.
>
> The other idea which seemed to be interesting is the one on implementing a
> connector to support S
Thanks Mark for your reply.
Though it's not mandatory, if it's going to be useful, then I'll continue
working on it and prepare a proposal.
The other idea which seemed to be interesting is the one on implementing a
connector to support SPDY protocol [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-
On 21/03/2010 14:36, Rajeev Sampath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm interested in the project idea on implementing JSR 196 specification for
> Tomcat. I've used Tomcat for some time, but as I'm not very much familiar
> with its internals or JSR 196 spec, I'm in the process of getting
> familiarized with t
Hello,
I'm interested in the project idea on implementing JSR 196 specification for
Tomcat. I've used Tomcat for some time, but as I'm not very much familiar
with its internals or JSR 196 spec, I'm in the process of getting
familiarized with them at the moment.
While searching the dev mailing lis
