Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove the invoker servlet

2008-10-28 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
+1 for security reasons Filip Mark Thomas wrote: All, I'd like to remove the invoker servlet entirely from trunk (and hence TC7.x onwards) and deprecate it in 6.0.x. Any objections? Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove the invoker servlet

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Thomas
Costin Manolache wrote: > +0 > > I kind of liked the functionality ( i.e. write a servlet and have it 'just > work', without web.xml ). > And the annotations have their own problems ( scanning all the classes ). V3 of the servlet spec should include the ability to add servlet and filter mappings

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove the invoker servlet

2008-10-28 Thread Costin Manolache
+0 I kind of liked the functionality ( i.e. write a servlet and have it 'just work', without web.xml ). And the annotations have their own problems ( scanning all the classes ). But to turn this around to my favorite subject - wouldn't be better to exclude it from the release ? Maybe this and the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove the invoker servlet

2008-10-28 Thread Yoav Shapira
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to remove the invoker servlet entirely from trunk (and hence TC7.x > onwards) and deprecate it in 6.0.x. +0. We should document it boldly and let people know before the release. Yoav -

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove the invoker servlet

2008-10-28 Thread Tim Funk
+1 - its an evil security hole -Tim Mark Thomas wrote: All, I'd like to remove the invoker servlet entirely from trunk (and hence TC7.x onwards) and deprecate it in 6.0.x. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For a

[PROPOSAL] Remove the invoker servlet

2008-10-28 Thread Mark Thomas
All, I'd like to remove the invoker servlet entirely from trunk (and hence TC7.x onwards) and deprecate it in 6.0.x. Any objections? Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT