Costin Manolache wrote:
Sorry, I didn't mean for 5.5.x or 6.0.x, but for whatever is next.
API breaking development is in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/ (not that there is that much
of it yet). Nearly all patches to that branch (CTR) are proposed for back
porting to 6.0.x, som
On 3/3/08, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
> > On 3/3/08, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:58 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >>>
> This problem is a sm
Costin Manolache wrote:
On 3/3/08, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:58 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
This problem is a small detail. Much more should be done if you want
to
do a refactoring: both th
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:58 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
This problem is a small detail. Much more should be done if you want to
do a refactoring: both the mark functionality and readLine need to have
direct access to the buffer to be
On 3/3/08, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:58 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>
> > Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > > This problem is a small detail. Much more should be done if you want
> to
> > > do a refactoring: both the mark functionality and readLine nee
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:58 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > This problem is a small detail. Much more should be done if you want to
> > do a refactoring: both the mark functionality and readLine need to have
> > direct access to the buffer to be able to be coded in
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:13 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffe
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java
===
---java/org/apache
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:13 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> > Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java
>
>
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java
===
---java/org/apache/catalina/connector/
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 18:25 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 17:08 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
This makes me think there's a straight issue in CharChunk (I su
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java
===
---java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java(revision
6
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java
===
---java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java (revision 630535)
+++java/org/apac
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java
> ===
> ---java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java(revision
> 630535)
> +++java/org/apache/catal
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 18:25 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 17:08 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> >
> >> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >>
> >>> This makes me think there's a straight issue in CharChunk (I suppose the
> >>> problem is
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 17:08 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
This makes me think there's a straight issue in CharChunk (I suppose the
problem is that realReadChars gets called with len = 0; if it handled
that scenario, things should be fi
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 17:08 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > This makes me think there's a straight issue in CharChunk (I suppose the
> > problem is that realReadChars gets called with len = 0; if it handled
> > that scenario, things should be fine).
> >
> the ol
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:04 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
unfortunately, the "elegant" solution caused a regression :(
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44494
I tested this with the inelegant (original proposed) patch a
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:04 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >> unfortunately, the "elegant" solution caused a regression :(
> >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44494
> >> I tested this with the inelegant (original proposed) patch and it
> >> worked
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:51 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
h
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:51 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
h
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:51 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Bill Barker wrote:
> > "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> >>
> >>> Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
> >>> http://people.ap
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/
This is what is happening
int cnt=conv.read( result, 0, BUFFER_SIZE
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bill Barker wrote:
>> "Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Bill Barker wrote:
>>>
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
Bill Barker wrote:
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Barker wrote:
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Barker wrote:
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROT
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bill Barker wrote:
>> "Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Bill Barker wrote:
>>>
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
Bill Barker wrote:
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Barker wrote:
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bill Barker wrote:
>> "Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Bill Barker wrote:
>>>
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
ne
Bill Barker wrote:
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be f
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bill Barker wrote:
>> "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>>>
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
http://pe
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/
This is what is happening
int cnt=conv.read( result, 0, BUFFER_SIZE
On Aug 22, 2007, at 9:32 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
and so the pissing contest begins, just in a different area.
ok, the so the only thing required for the fix is
1. available() call on the intermediate stream
2. make sure the B2CConverter uses while(available) in
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
and so the pissing contest begins, just in a different area.
ok, the so the only thing required for the fix is
1. available() call on the intermediate stream
2. make sure the B2CConverter uses while(available) instead of
while(true)
here is
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
and so the pissing contest begins, just in a different area.
ok, the so the only thing required for the fix is
1. available() call on the intermediate stream
2. make sure the B2CConverter uses while(available) instead of while(true)
here is the 5.5 patch (had you a
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/
This is what is happening
int cnt=conv.read( result, 0, BUFFER_SIZE
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
>> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/
>>
>> This is what is happening
>>
>> int cnt=conv.read( result, 0, BUFFER_SIZE );
>> is ca
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/
This is what is happening
int cnt=conv.read( result, 0, BUFFER_SIZE );
is called with a "while (true)" statement,
When the IntermediateInputStream.rea
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/
This is what is happening
int cnt=conv.read( result, 0, BUFFER_SIZE );
is called with a "while (true)" statement,
When the IntermediateInputStream.read returns -1, the above
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/
This is what is happening
int cnt=conv.read( result, 0, BUFFER_SIZE );
is called with a "while (true)" statement,
When the IntermediateInputStream.read returns -1, the above statement returns
cnt==1.
So t
39 matches
Mail list logo
