Hi Filip, hi all developers,
I think TC clustering from a users perspective got more robust in the
last two years. Whe we started playing around with it in 2004 it was
great, that we all basic functionality already worked, but you might
remember, that I contributed a couple of fixes to make
Rainer, all are very good thoughts. Here is why I opt we still move forward
1. If we don't primary/secondary will not be available until TC.6
2. TC 6 doesn't have a skeleton nor a date yet.
3. Many people are opting out of clustering today because of lack of
primary/sec. all-to-all is too
Hi Filip,
thanks for taking it seriously!
1. If we don't primary/secondary will not be available until TC.6
3. Many people are opting out of clustering today because of lack of
primary/sec. all-to-all is too inefficient for the general public
I understand your primary motivation. It#s
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Rainer, all are very good thoughts. Here is why I opt we still move forward
1. If we don't primary/secondary will not be available until TC.6
2. TC 6 doesn't have a skeleton nor a date yet.
It could have that tomorrow.
3. Many people are opting out of
Hey Rainer, Filip and Remy,
Am 23.02.2006 um 17:20 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Hi Remy,
1. If we don't primary/secondary will not be available until TC.6
2. TC 6 doesn't have a skeleton nor a date yet.
It could have that tomorrow.
...
I agree with Peter: it's obvious no one should be doing major
Am 23.02.2006 um 16:51 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Hi Filip,
thanks for taking it seriously!
1. If we don't primary/secondary will not be available until TC.6
3. Many people are opting out of clustering today because of lack of
primary/sec. all-to-all is too inefficient for the general public
