Mladen,
On 9/4/13 11:58 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 09/04/2013 03:30 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
An ambiguity is only if a hostname is used. Do you propose the prefix
for hostnames only, not numeric IP addresses?
There is also one other option and that is to always resolve to IPV4
Hi,
I'll be working on IPV6 support for mod_jk so hopefully we'll have
a working solution next week.
There is a patch in that direction (bz #44290) but it has few problems.
Patch removes using APR, but that's easily solvable.
However major question is how to preserve existing configuration
On 09/04/2013 09:31 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Next, do we need something for java side? Are the java connectors
capable of listening to IPV6 addresses?
According to the tests I did months ago they did work.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
2013/9/4 Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org:
Hi,
I'll be working on IPV6 support for mod_jk so hopefully we'll have
a working solution next week.
There is a patch in that direction (bz #44290) but it has few problems.
Patch removes using APR, but that's easily solvable.
However major question is
On 09/04/2013 03:30 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2013/9/4 Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org:
For numeric hostnames that easy by just parsing
hexadecimal + colon for IPV6 and decimal + dot for IPV6
An ambiguity is only if a hostname is used. Do you propose the prefix
for hostnames only, not
On 09/04/2013 03:30 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
An ambiguity is only if a hostname is used. Do you propose the prefix
for hostnames only, not numeric IP addresses?
There is also one other option and that is to always resolve to IPV4
address if both IPV4 and IPV6 have same hostname entry.
