Re: OpenSSL without APR experiment

2016-06-27 18:27 GMT+02:00 jean-frederic clere : > On 06/27/2016 06:07 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > 2016-06-27 17:52 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : > > > >> Is the performance any different from NIO[2] + tc-native 1.2 + OpenSSL? > >> If I recall correctly, when I

Re: OpenSSL without APR experiment

On 06/27/2016 06:07 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > 2016-06-27 17:52 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : > >> Is the performance any different from NIO[2] + tc-native 1.2 + OpenSSL? >> If I recall correctly, when I asked previously you said APR/native >> generally had better performance. >> >

Re: OpenSSL without APR experiment

2016-06-27 17:52 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : > Is the performance any different from NIO[2] + tc-native 1.2 + OpenSSL? > If I recall correctly, when I asked previously you said APR/native > generally had better performance. > The performance is the same as before, there's really

Re: OpenSSL without APR experiment

On 27/06/2016 16:27, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > As part of a university projects, two students from the University of > Neuchatel have worked on OpenSSL support without APR, effectively producing > a JNI wrapper for OpenSSL. > > It works well according to my testing and is pretty much as

OpenSSL without APR experiment

Hi, As part of a university projects, two students from the University of Neuchatel have worked on OpenSSL support without APR, effectively producing a JNI wrapper for OpenSSL. It works well according to my testing and is pretty much as expected (the JNI interfaces are now much more limited in