Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 6, 2013 5:42 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
On 06/10/2013 02:57, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
These errors seem to be introduced with r1529537 [2
On 07/10/2013 13:22, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Mark,
-Original Message- From: Mark Thomas
[mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, October 6, 2013 5:42 PM To:
Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
On 06/10/2013 02:57, Konstantin Preißer wrote
Hi Mark,
thank you for your reply.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 2:50 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
However, it seems when the websocket message is greater than ~ 8 KB
(perhaps
Konstantin,
On 10/5/13 9:56 AM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Niki Dokovski [mailto:nick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2013 7:47 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
I have installed Wireshark now and can confirm
On 07/10/2013 14:09, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Mark,
thank you for your reply.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 2:50 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
However, it seems when
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 3:53 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
To me this reads that by default (value = -1), there is no limit when
processing whole messages, so I
Hi Christopher,
thank you for your reply.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 3:29 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
Konstantin,
Note that it's not Tomcat sending
Konstantin,
On 10/7/13 10:24 AM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 3:29 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
Konstantin,
Note that it's
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
Konstantin,
Note that it's not Tomcat sending the ACKs, but the TCP/IP stack in the
OS running underneath the JVM. I wanted to point that out because it
means that Tomcat may be entirely unaware that data exists for reading
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Preißer [mailto:kpreis...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 4:10 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Konstantin Preißer kpreis...@apache.orgwrote:
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Preißer [mailto:kpreis...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 4:10 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
Hi Mark
Hi Niki,
-Original Message-
From: Niki Dokovski [mailto:nick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 7:20 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
Looking into the javadoc of those methods and the implementation this
seems
to be the correct
On 06/10/2013 02:57, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
These errors seem to be introduced with r1529537 [2], as I get these errors
with that revision, but with the previous one (r1529536) it works fine.
That patch is causing other problems too. Time to revert and re-think.
Mark
Hi Niki,
thank you for your reply.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Dokovski [mailto:nick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2013 7:47 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
I have installed Wireshark now and can confirm that Firefox (after
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Konstantin Preißer kpreis...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi Niki,
thank you for your reply.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Dokovski [mailto:nick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2013 7:47 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x
On 05/10/2013 14:56, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Niki, thank you for your reply.
-Original Message- From: Niki Dokovski
[mailto:nick...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2013 7:47 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
I have installed Wireshark
Hi Mark,
thanks for your reply.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2013 9:00 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
OK. Create a Bugzilla entry for this one. It could be a Tomcat issue, it
could also
On 05/10/2013 20:42, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
One question, would it be possible to make Session.getAsyncRemote()
throw some RuntimeException when using the BIO connector, instead of
silently using blocking writes?
No. WebSocket is written on top of the Servlet 3.1 API. It has no access
to
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2013 9:46 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
On 05/10/2013 20:42, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
One question, would it be possible to make
Hi Mark,
while I was developing and experimenting with a WebSocket application (that I
think could be added to Tomcat 8's WebSocket examples), I think I found some
more possible issues with the Websocket handling. One of these can be seen with
the Snake example.
A) For NIO and APR connector:
On 04/10/2013 22:49, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Mark,
while I was developing and experimenting with a WebSocket application (that I
think could be added to Tomcat 8's WebSocket examples), I think I found some
more possible issues with the Websocket handling. One of these can be seen
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 11:58 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
On 04/10/2013 22:49, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Mark,
while I was developing and experimenting
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Konstantin Preißer kpreis...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 11:58 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
On 04/10/2013 22:49
On 02/10/2013 20:36, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:28 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
On 01/10/2013 19:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
8.0.x trunk
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 10:56 AM
Thanks. When I now open snake.xhtml with Chrome, press a key and close
Chrome, then the snake disappears.
Then, I also get the following exception - probably because
On 02/10/2013 18:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/10/2013 19:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
All the other issues I am aware of have been resolved.
The fairly frequent (5%-10%) failure rate of TestCoyoteOutputStream
still needs to be addressed.
This appears to impact all connectors so at this point it
Mark,
On 1.10.2013 20:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
Pulling together information from multiple threads:
8.0.x trunk appears to be stable (i.e. no longer crashes) (...)
Tomcat 8.0.x trunk (r1528329) + tcnative built by Mladen works for me,
as well.
-Ognjen
On 02/10/2013 08:56, Ognjen Blagojevic wrote:
Mark,
On 1.10.2013 20:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
Pulling together information from multiple threads:
8.0.x trunk appears to be stable (i.e. no longer crashes) (...)
Tomcat 8.0.x trunk (r1528329) + tcnative built by Mladen works for me,
as well.
On 01/10/2013 22:56, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:39 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
Pulling together information from multiple threads:
8.0.x
On 02/10/13 09:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/10/2013 22:56, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:39 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
Pulling together information
On 02/10/2013 12:23, Brian Burch wrote:
On 02/10/13 09:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/10/2013 22:56, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:39 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: 8.0.x /
On 02/10/13 12:27, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 02/10/2013 12:23, Brian Burch wrote:
On 02/10/13 09:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/10/2013 22:56, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:39 PM
To:
On 02/10/2013 13:06, Brian Burch wrote:
On 02/10/13 12:27, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 02/10/2013 12:23, Brian Burch wrote:
On 02/10/13 09:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/10/2013 22:56, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent:
On 01/10/2013 19:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
8.0.x trunk appears to be stable (i.e. no longer crashes)
So far no-one has come forward with results to contradict this and folks
that reported issues with RC3 have not been able to repeat them.
The additional issues reported with the snake example have
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 1:28 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
On 01/10/2013 19:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
8.0.x trunk appears to be stable (i.e. no longer crashes)
So far
On 02/10/2013 19:15, Bob DeRemer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 1:28 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
On 01/10/2013 19:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
8.0.x trunk appears
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:28 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
On 01/10/2013 19:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
8.0.x trunk appears to be stable (i.e. no longer crashes)
So
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:39 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
Pulling together information from multiple threads:
8.0.x trunk appears to be stable (i.e. no longer
38 matches
Mail list logo
