Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 10:50 PM
2014-04-23 0:43 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
(snip)
No objection to the final being restored, it is good practice to use
final when possible.
Mark/Konstantin,
On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Revision: 1588102
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Apr 18 15:29:06 2014
--
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/04/2014 20:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark/Konstantin,
On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko Revision: 1588102 Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Apr 18 15:29:06 2014
2014-04-22 23:53 GMT+04:00 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
Mark/Konstantin,
On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Revision: 1588102
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Apr 18 15:29:06 2014
Mark,
On 4/22/14, 3:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/04/2014 20:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark/Konstantin,
On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko Revision: 1588102 Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Apr 18 15:29:06 2014
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/04/2014 21:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 4/22/14, 3:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/04/2014 20:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark/Konstantin,
On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko Revision:
Mark,
On 4/22/14, 4:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/04/2014 21:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 4/22/14, 3:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/04/2014 20:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark/Konstantin,
On 4/18/14, 11:29 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko Revision:
On 22/04/2014 21:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Before posting, I checked just so I wouldn't embarrass myself. It
worked just fine. My guess is that you changed the implementation
to throw an exception after removing the 'final' which then makes
the 'final' legal again.
I don't see any
2014-04-23 0:30 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 22/04/2014 21:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Before posting, I checked just so I wouldn't embarrass myself. It
worked just fine. My guess is that you changed the implementation
to throw an exception after removing the 'final' which
Mark,
On 4/22/14, 4:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/04/2014 21:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Before posting, I checked just so I wouldn't embarrass myself. It
worked just fine. My guess is that you changed the implementation
to throw an exception after removing the 'final' which then makes
On 22/04/2014 21:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2014-04-23 0:30 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 22/04/2014 21:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Before posting, I checked just so I wouldn't embarrass myself. It
worked just fine. My guess is that you changed the implementation
to throw
2014-04-23 0:43 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 22/04/2014 21:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2014-04-23 0:30 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 22/04/2014 21:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Before posting, I checked just so I wouldn't embarrass myself. It
worked just fine.
12 matches
Mail list logo
