Mladen Turk wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
But I'm open. If we remove the const, we also need to remove it for
the log_fmt (got as compiler warning also there, but don't have the
line number at hand).
Which would you prefer? Do you see a problem with the const, like
wrong co
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
But I'm open. If we remove the const, we also need to remove it for
the log_fmt (got as compiler warning also there, but don't have the
line number at hand).
Which would you prefer? Do you see a problem with the const, like
wrong compiler optimization
Rainer Jung wrote:
But I'm open. If we remove the const, we also need to remove it for the
log_fmt (got as compiler warning also there, but don't have the line
number at hand).
Which would you prefer? Do you see a problem with the const, like wrong
compiler optimization or so?
Yes, that
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Nov 20 09:29:26 2007
New Revision: 596747
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596747&view=rev
Log:
Add comments to explain timestamp formatting for sub seconds resolution.
Furthermore increased the accepted format length a b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Nov 20 09:29:26 2007
New Revision: 596747
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596747&view=rev
Log:
Add comments to explain timestamp formatting for sub seconds resolution.
Furthermore increased the accepted format length a bit.
Before we accept
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Nov 20 09:29:26 2007
New Revision: 596747
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596747&view=rev
Log:
Add comments to explain timestamp formatting for sub seconds resolution.
Furthermore increased the accepted format length a bit.
Before we accepted JK_TIME_MAX_SIZE=64 byte
