On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 20:00 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Tue Sep 2 13:00:36 2008
> New Revision: 691359
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=691359&view=rev
> Log:
> Added in Bayeux implementation, as per
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> +For the bayeux implementation*
> +* Copyright 2007-2008 Guy Molinari
> +* Copyright 2007-2008 Filip Hanik
> +* Copyright 2007 Dojo Foundation
> +* Copyright 2007 Mort Bay Consulting Pty. Ltd.
>
> Personally, I don't like that. As far as I am concerned, I like t
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 23:10 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > +For the bayeux implementation*
> > +* Copyright 2007-2008 Guy Molinari
> > +* Copyright 2007-2008 Filip Hanik
> > +* Copyright 2007 Dojo Foundation
> > +* Copyright 2007 Mort Bay Consulting Pty. Ltd.
> >
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 20:00 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Sep 2 13:00:36 2008
New Revision: 691359
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=691359&view=rev
Log:
Added in Bayeux implementation, as per
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 23:10 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>> +For the bayeux implementation*
>>> +* Copyright 2007-2008 Guy Molinari
>>> +* Copyright 2007-2008 Filip Hanik
>>> +* Copyright 2007 Dojo Foundation
>>> +* Copyright 2007 Mort Bay
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 23:37 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Therefore, I vote -1 for this contribution as it does not comply with the
> published ASF source headers policy. I am happy for this contribution to
> remain in trunk providing that the necessary changes are made in a
> reasonable time scale.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 23:37 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
Therefore, I vote -1 for this contribution as it does not comply with the
published ASF source headers policy. I am happy for this contribution to
remain in trunk providing that the necessary changes are made in a
rea
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Therefore, I vote -1 for this contribution as it does not comply with the
> published ASF source headers policy. I am happy for this contribution to
> remain in trunk providing that the necessary changes are made in a
> reasonable time scale.
I have re-read the policy and the