On 15.05.2010 22:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/05/2010 00:14, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri May 14 23:14:51 2010
New Revision: 944511
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=944511view=rev
Log:
Check whether context is null.
-1 on this change. I'll be reverting it shortly.
1.
Looks good to me!
On 17.05.2010 16:41, Mark Thomas wrote:
I have drafted an announcement of the upcoming TC7 release for our first
blog post. It can be previewed here:
http://blogs.apache.org/preview/tomcat/?previewEntry=apache_tomcat_7_released
Suggestions for improvements welcome.
Note the
On 17.05.2010 19:56, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/5/17 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
I've just completed testing of trunk.
Unit tests - pass
They also pass for me, but Gump fails at TestCoyoteAdaptor:
On 17.05.2010 19:50, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/5/17ma...@apache.org:
Author: markt
Date: Mon May 17 17:45:53 2010
New Revision: 945271
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=945271view=rev
Log:
Fix Eclipse warnings.
Reduce line length.
@@ -243,14 +253,9 @@ public class
On 17.05.2010 19:56, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/5/17 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
I've just completed testing of trunk.
Unit tests - pass
They also pass for me, but Gump fails at TestCoyoteAdaptor:
On 06.06.2010 17:41, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 06/04/2010 09:57 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
When can we make 6.0.27?
There were a couple of important fixes since 6.0.26, like BZ 48903
(classloader deadlock).
I think it is about time to make 6.0.27.
+1 I will start to prepare the
On 08.06.2010 22:08, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/8/2010 1:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
-1 veto. This is not the appropriate test for a threaded MPM.
We have ap_mpm_query for this very purpose, please don't continue
to propagate this broken meme!!!
I'm sorry - I didn't read this
Sorry for the noise, wrong list and language ...
On 08.06.2010 22:20, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 08.06.2010 22:08, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/8/2010 1:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
-1 veto. This is not the appropriate test for a threaded MPM.
We have ap_mpm_query for this very purpose
On 09.06.2010 04:58, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
JIKESPATH environment variable is used to provide path to the standard
library files of JRE (rt.jar etc.), because the standard javac
compiler knows where those are, but jikes does not. I found the
explanation in its FAQ, [1].
[1]
On 09.06.2010 03:55, nisen wrote:
ecj-3.5.1.jar should be change to jasper-jdt.jar
in tomcat-7.0-doc/class-loader-howto.html and
tomcat-7.0-doc/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
---
jasper-jdt.jar - Eclipse JDT 3.2 Java compiler.
---
but it's bin\apache-tomcat-7.0.0-RC4.zip\lib\ecj-3.5.1.jar
maybe we
On 09.06.2010 12:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/06/2010 10:22, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Wed Jun 9 09:22:32 2010
New Revision: 952919
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952919view=rev
Log:
Cleanup JDT vs. ECJ:
- Replace jasper-jdt.jar component with Eclipse JDT Java
On 09.06.2010 17:17, vini mr wrote:
Hi Team,
For the IIS tomcat configuration, i need to customize the 503 error message
which is present in *'isapi_redirect.dll'*.
*DLL file which i am using :*
On 09.06.2010 17:39, vini mr wrote:
I am building .dll file of 32 Bit
and i am using IIS of 32Bit Version.
and my IIS 6.0 is running on Windows 2003 Server ( 32 Bit ).
Hmm, I'm somewhat out of ideas. Never built on VS 2008. Maybe Mladen or
Tim have an idea.
Rainer
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010
After updating the tool wrapper script I noticed, that it sources setenv
and that this might not be adequate.
Actually I don't know the common or possible use cases of the script and
searching didn't reveal much. Users typically set JVM size in setenv and
at least for the digest feature it
On 10.06.2010 07:59, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.27 on Monday (European morning) and start the release
process.
Comments?
+1, thanks!
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
On 10.06.2010 12:32, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Jun 10 10:32:38 2010
New Revision: 953272
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=953272view=rev
Log:
Update the status of the Tomcat track: Ready :D
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
Here we go ...
On 14.06.2010 00:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
The propsoed 7.0.0 release is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 7.0.0 Alpha
[X] Beta - go ahead and release as 7.0.0 Beta
-
To
On 15.06.2010 10:24, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.27/
According to the release process, the 6.0.27 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_27 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
On 01.07.2010 17:20, Marc Guillemot wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
...
I run a daily test and just looked to what breaks it and complain.
Now I am looking to Peter's application to find what is broken.
so you're the continuous integration server ;-)
Can you publish break information or
Hi Peter,
On 04.07.2010 00:48, p...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pero
Date: Sat Jul 3 22:48:16 2010
New Revision: 960283
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=960283view=rev
Log:
Fix Bug 49528 - HttpServletRequest.isAsyncStarted() returns false when a
Runnable is started
Add isDebugEnabled
The fixcrlf handling of RTF files when packed into the source
distribution has changed as a side effect of
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=893572
It was don't change before and fix after.
It seems the RTF spec is at least unclear about correct line endings
with a tendency
On 01.07.2010 18:42, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 01.07.2010 17:20, Marc Guillemot wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
...
I run a daily test and just looked to what breaks it and complain.
Now I am looking to Peter's application to find what is broken.
so you're the continuous integration server
On 04.07.2010 22:11, Peter Roßbach wrote:
Hmm,
Spec says:
public boolean isAsyncStarted() - Returns true if async processing
has started on this request, and false otherwise. If this request has been
dispatched using one of the AsyncContext.dispatch methods since it was
put in asynchronous
On 29.06.2010 17:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
According to the release process, the 6.0.28 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_28 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
+++
Comments?
- MD5 OK
- signatures OK
- as Konstantin noted: it would be nice if you added your key to the
On 01.07.2010 18:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
According to the release process, the 5.5.30 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_30 [1] is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
- MD5 OK
- Signatures OK
- Mostly expected differences between tag and src archives, except:
- Did you include
On 07.07.2010 21:00, sebb wrote:
On 7 July 2010 10:47, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 29.06.2010 17:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
- build.properties: it would be nice, if you did the release changes to the
file before tagging (and undo after) like Mark does for TC 7
On 08.07.2010 01:14, sebb wrote:
On 7 July 2010 21:19, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 07.07.2010 21:00, sebb wrote:
On 7 July 2010 10:47, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 29.06.2010 17:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
- build.properties: it would be nice, if
On 08.07.2010 10:30, Marc Guillemot wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
JavadocType (versionFormat) - currently 539 failures
Not sure what exactly you are proposing here. Could you clarify?
I mean the format of the @Version JavaDoc tag what Konstantin Kolinko
has started to fix:
On 09.07.2010 17:14, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/09/2010 03:56 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml?rev=962531r1=962530r2=962531view=diff
I had a look at BZ46451. It suggests adding subversion properties to
enable the use of subversion bugtraq. This allows a better integration
of BZ into subversion commit messages and retrieval when looking at svn
logs.
There is a blog here
On 13.07.2010 22:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 13/07/2010 19:57, Rainer Jung wrote:
I had a look at BZ46451. It suggests adding subversion properties to
enable the use of subversion bugtraq. This allows a better integration
of BZ into subversion commit messages and retrieval when looking at svn
On 15.07.2010 15:34, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/7/15 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
I'm teaching a Tomcat course today and tomorrow and one of the students
raised the question why is the default host called localhost? The implied
relationship to 127.0.0.1 was causing confusion. That got me
On 16.07.2010 12:30, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/07/2010 08:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 07/15/2010 11:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Folks,
It looks like we have a regression in the cookie handling. Invalidating
the session and then requesting a new session results in a mal-formed
header (in
On 14.07.2010 19:14, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 13.07.2010 22:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 13/07/2010 19:57, Rainer Jung wrote:
I had a look at BZ46451. It suggests adding subversion properties to
enable the use of subversion bugtraq. This allows a better integration
of BZ into subversion commit
On 18.07.2010 02:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/07/2010 00:57, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Jul 17 23:57:23 2010
New Revision: 965150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965150view=rev
Log:
Restore pero's timeout fix for the BIO connector. Add configuration of the
timeout.
On 20.07.2010 08:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 07/19/2010 07:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/07/2010 23:50, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 18.07.2010 02:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/07/2010 00:57, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Jul 17 23:57:23 2010
New Revision: 965150
URL: http
On 21.07.2010 09:40, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/07/2010 11:14, Rainer Jung wrote:
So: the default we use is 1, but if the timeout were=0 then I
think the condition in the AsyncTimeout runnable would fail.
Agreed. That matches with what I was observing.
I have no idea if a default timeout
On 22.07.2010 15:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/07/2010 14:44, Rainer Jung wrote:
This is a SPAM issue. Is there a way to remove it and possibly block the
user? A second SPAM issue by the same reporter is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
No other issues reported
On 22.07.2010 15:49, Henri Gomez wrote:
An AJP command line 'client', could be a somewhat good idea :)
Sure, this is already tracked via issue
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47242
The one I referred to had pure Spam content, apart from the title of the
issue.
Regards,
On 28.07.2010 07:44, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/27/2010 08:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
What happens if you disable the terminateAPR call?
Thanks. That was it. I changed the point where that was called and that
fixed it although it did then highlight a huge delay (~30s) to shutdown
the connector.
On 29.07.2010 15:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
The current Manager implementations have slightly different definitions
of 'active session' that I would like to make consistent in 7.0.x (and
maybe backport to 6.0.x)
Ignoring expired and invalidated sessions:
- in the StandardManager, all sessions are
On 29.07.2010 17:00, Arjen Knibbe wrote:
I searched for an upgrading to Tomcat 7 manual in the Tomcat documentation
to check if the new JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener is mentioned, but I
could not find any guidelines for upgrading...
There is some info about major version differences at
On 29.07.2010 21:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/07/2010 19:32, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 29 18:32:58 2010
New Revision: 980535
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=980535view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49407
Make BackupManager and
On 23.10.2009 22:00, rj...@apache.org wrote:
+* Loading tcnative is broken since r795039.
+ https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47712
+ https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24411
+ +1: rjung
+ -1:
Just a short note: this is a regression from TC 5.5.27.
On 07.11.2009 17:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
I was thinking about this on my way back from ApacheCon and we probably
need to get some advice out to users early next week.
My current understanding is that the MITM attack is triggered by a
renegotiation.
Yes, client side initiated (AFAIK
On 09.11.2009 11:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
Summarising the information gathered so far from various channels
(thanks to Bill B., Bill W. Rainer who have done most of the actual
work to find the info below).
BIO/NIO connectors using JSSE.
Vulnerable when renegotiation is triggered by the
On 09.11.2009 17:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/11/9 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
Summarising the information gathered so far from various channels
(thanks to Bill B., Bill W. Rainer who have done most of the actual
work to find the info below).
BIO/NIO connectors
On 10.11.2009 01:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Unless someone has a better solution - I'll submit the fix ( tonight ), will
disable re-negotiation for
Jsse-mode.
I added a system property to allow people how don't care about this, IMO by
default it should
be on.
Sounds
On 10.11.2009 05:36, Costin Manolache wrote:
The request will not be executed - how can he continue the attack ?
I don't get that as well. As far as I understand the attack, there is no
information disclosure. The only thing an attacker can do is mixing his
request with a user supplied one,
On 10.11.2009 15:26, ma...@apache.org wrote:
@@ -105,6 +102,7 @@
protected String clientAuth = false;
protected SSLServerSocketFactory sslProxy = null;
protected String[] enabledCiphers;
+protected boolean enableMitmVulnerability = false;
/**
* Flag to state
On 10.11.2009 16:32, Ian Darwin wrote:
Isn't the naming a bit harsh? OpenSSl names it legacy renegotiation (to
make it differ from the future renegotiation with TLS extension). So
maybe enableLegacyRenegotiation would be better? Of course it wouldn't
keep people from activating as much as
On 10.11.2009 22:36, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 10/11/09 22:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
Are there any changes to bring old logs back in,
or are they lost for good?
They are still there. Tell your client not to stop on copy/move.
On 10.11.2009 22:53, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 10/11/09 22:43, Rainer Jung wrote:
That's a viewvc annoyance. Since the page shows it's revision 802231,
type 802230 into the Sticky Revision field and click Set. That
will move you to the previous place. Again that one was a short lived
copy
On 12.11.2009 17:39, Mladen Turk wrote:
Well even OpenSSL folks admitted that 0.9.8l wrongly approached
dealing to that issue. They even removed the
SSL3_FLAGS_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION flag from the 0.9.8 branch
and now they use SSL_OP_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION using
Thomas,
please do not cross-post. The discussion is pretty well going on on your
post on the users list. See the latest answers you got on your posted
test case and logs, which show that for this specific test your request
to JBoss didn't return a PDF document, but instead an html snippet.
On 12.11.2009 21:31, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/11/09 21:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 12.11.2009 17:39, Mladen Turk wrote:
Well even OpenSSL folks admitted that 0.9.8l wrongly approached
dealing to that issue. They even removed the
SSL3_FLAGS_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION flag from the 0.9.8
On 17.11.2009 07:51, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Anyone knows what might be the pitfalls of sharing the
CATALINA_BASE among multiple TC instances?
Presume you have a way to bind multiple instance's
Connectors to the same ports what might be other problems?
For example app management
Sounds good to me, thanks!
Info not yet ready for users@: On d...@httpd there is discusion, whether
to fix request splicing attacks by dropping the buffer, therefore
effectively not allowing to combine a partial request before reneg with
the request coming after the reneg. Although we don't know
Hi Mladen,
On 15.12.2009 11:14, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Dec 15 10:14:28 2009
New Revision: 890738
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=890738view=rev
Log:
Use better thread id logic. Use 4/8 byte alignment
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_util.c
Hi Tim,
On 18.12.2009 03:26, Tim Whittington wrote:
Hi all
We're experiencing issues with the Tomcat Connector log in some IIS production
sites where the log file grows to a very large size (8GB on one site).
This is almost entirely due to connection errors between the front end and back
end
Hi Mark, Konstantin and everyone else,
On 20.12.2009 03:37, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Add support for a connectionTimeout attribute to the JNDIRealm
I know I voted fror it, but when going through the commits again I
wondered whether we should call is connectTimeout instead of
On 21.12.2009 17:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/12/2009 15:59, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/12/21ma...@apache.org:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Dec 21 14:30:46 2009
New Revision: 892834
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892834view=rev
Log:
Proposal
+
+* Fix
On 21.12.2009 19:01, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/12/21rj...@apache.org:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Dec 21 17:52:10 2009
New Revision: 892905
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892905view=rev
Log:
Vote.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
@@ -335,5 +335,7 @@
On 21.12.2009 13:02, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Dec 21 12:02:54 2009
New Revision: 892787
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892787view=rev
Log:
Fix #47224 by invalidating endoint cache on address change
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c
On 21.12.2009 13:55, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Dec 21 12:55:02 2009
New Revision: 892803
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892803view=rev
Log:
Fix #48276. Just like with setting port to 0, if the resolve fails, mark the
worker as disabled
Modified:
On 22.12.2009 19:09, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Something missing and hard to guess. The total number of currently opened
connection per worker
Cool!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 22.12.2009 20:05, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/22/2009 07:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.12.2009 19:09, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Something missing and hard to guess. The total number of currently
opened connection per worker
Cool!
Even more cool option would be the mechanism to
close all
On 23.12.2009 00:45, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/12/22 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
(...)
Since we are going to have to re-tag anyway, it would be good if the
patches required to fix the various niggles above were applied before
the tag.
Mark
+1 to re-tag.
And I would like the fix to
On 23.12.2009 10:33, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/12/23 Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org:
On 12/23/2009 02:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
release candidates (marking the files with rcX or dev or whatever) the
only safe thing would be to burn version number 6.0.21 and go for 6.0.22.
+1
Let's make
On 23.12.2009 13:10, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/12/2009 11:39, rj...@apache.org wrote:
+ One question before going +1: where does '*' as a filename prefix
+ come from?
man mdssum
Thanks! I thought it came from simulating some alternative ant way of
doing things.
As you said,
On 04.01.2010 14:10, Henri Gomez wrote:
It's not the case in the OS/X version
Henri: are you able to build a dylib for MacOS wit statically linked in
APR and OpenSSL libs?
2010/1/4 Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org:
Hi,
Version 1.1.18 wasn't properly tagged, so it
carries the 1.1.16 version in
On 04.01.2010 15:53, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 01/04/2010 02:10 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
It's not the case in the OS/X version
Nope. the windows .rc file wasn't updated
before 1.1.18 tag, so when you compile a .dll
and check it's resource version, it reports 1.1.16
This can be a problem with some
What is the use of the file
native/srclib/VERSIONS
in tcnative?
Ib the 1.1.x branch it contains the info:
=
Use the following version of the libraries
- APR 1.2.8, http://apr.apache.org
- OpenSSL 0.9.8e, http://www.openssl.org
On 05.01.2010 08:59, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 01/04/2010 08:50 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/1/4rj...@apache.org:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 4 16:58:04 2010
New Revision: 895700
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895700view=rev
Log:
Fix apr version test i tcnative trunk.
On 05.01.2010 10:04, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 01/05/2010 09:11 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think the file native/srclib/VERSIONS should be created by configure
and doesn't need to be in repository.
This file is more like a README. It says which version is
recommended/required for the
Hi Mladen,
I seem to remember that the fix line ends perl script is part of the
tcnative repos.
Regards,
Rainer
On 05.01.2010 12:39, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Jan 5 11:39:27 2010
New Revision: 895998
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895998view=rev
Log:
Fix
Any objections to the following plan about JK 1.2.29?
- 15.01.2009
make snapshot available for testing feedback like we did
for nearly all previous releases
- ~22.01.2009
tag 1.2.29 (exact date depending whether there's bug feedback)
Regards,
Rainer
On 08.01.2010 23:10, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/6 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
i.e. until the
On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that Tim
Whittington has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
Please join me in welcoming him.
Regards,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 12.01.2010 19:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/01/2010 18:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/1/12 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
Thank you for vote. I would very like to see the JULI FileHandler
buffering patch in 6.0.23.
A third vote is required.
Done.
I think we need to get 6.0.23 out asap.
On 13.01.2010 10:09, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.23 tomorrow lunch time (~13h00 my time).
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
In r899134 property version=6.0-snapshot has been removed from
build.properties.default and property version.suffix=-dev has been
added. The full version is now automatically combined from the
individual parts defined in build.properties(.default).
Please remove version from your individual
Konstantin gave some arguments, why the use of @VERSION@ and similar ant
tags in top level text files (and filtering them) instead of directly
using explicit version numbers like 7 or 7.0 might not be good. The
files are
- RELEASE-NOTES
- RUNNING.txt
- BUILDING.txt
and
On 14.01.2010 23:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
The subject says it all really. Still no sign of the TCK so there are
probably some bugs in my understanding/interpretation of the spec.
Great Job!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 15.01.2010 08:22, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 01/14/2010 10:45 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
if all we find wrong is line endings, then I would suggest
1. fix the packaging script
2. Add the fix to the tag
3. rerun the script
4. post the new binaries
We have to fix the TCK
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan 14 20:21:23 2010
New Revision: 899395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899395view=rev
Log:
zip is for non-windows platforms
Hmmm, really?
Until recently we didn't have the individual binary release zips for
On 15.01.2010 16:06, Mladen Turk wrote:
Although some platforms have broken(limited) default tar.
Dunno if we are using very long paths that would break tar
on Solaris (eg. +100 character path names)
Yes, src, bin and fulldocs tarballs include longer path names then 100
chars.
OTOH even the
On 19.01.2010 01:59, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Is http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/ generated from /native/trunk,
or from /native/branches/1.1.x/ ?
Apparently the site for 1.1.18 was generated from trunk, but the one
for 1.1.19 from the 1.1.x branch.
I'd say should be generated from
AM GMT +12:00 New Zealand
Subject: Re: JK 1.2.29 Plan
+1
I've done majority of planned fixes.
Let's tag and then play with IIS rotatelogs.
BTW, the IIS logging should be fixed now
(compiling with commode.obj that forces a real flush on fflush)
On 01/06/2010 11:07 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Any
On 08.02.2010 08:46, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/08/2010 08:38 AM, Tim Whittington wrote:
There's a USE_RAW_HEADERS define that will force the use of the raw HTTP
headers and avoid this problem, so I'd propose that we make that
behaviour
the default.
I agree with having it default, but is it
Hi Mladen,
On 17.02.2010 13:23, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/11/2010 12:15 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Test snapshot for 1.2.29 is available at
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/
So far no comments, so I suppose everything works like a charm.
Since we have postponed this
- silence from me -
(but I still plan to review the changes later today)
On 22.02.2010 14:39, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag 1.2.29 tomorrow around 12:00 GMT
and later propose a vote.
We had few release snapshots that had no
show-stoppers reported beside one bug and
one regression that
Hi Mladen,
On 22.02.2010 14:39, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag 1.2.29 tomorrow around 12:00 GMT
and later propose a vote.
We had few release snapshots that had no
show-stoppers reported beside one bug and
one regression that are already solved.
In case someone has a serious reason why I
On 24.02.2010 01:07, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 24 00:07:06 2010
New Revision: 915603
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=915603view=rev
Log:
Add basic memory leak detection for JMX and manager (kkolinko/markt)
Modified:
On 24.02.2010 11:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/02/2010 10:18, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 24.02.2010 01:07, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 24 00:07:06 2010
New Revision: 915603
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=915603view=rev
Log:
Add basic memory leak detection for JMX
On 27.02.2010 13:02, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/2/27mt...@apache.org:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 10:16:14 2010
New Revision: 916938
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916938view=rev
Log:
Revert withdrawal notice. Seems this requires a vote
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my
On 27.02.2010 15:16, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/27/2010 02:28 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/2/27 Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org:
+1
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
It does. Same as for release.
It's been only a day since announced, so as soon
we remove it and release 1.2.30
On 27.02.2010 15:54, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/27/2010 03:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I just made an notice on tomcat index.html
Should be enough thought.
I'll also add the same notice to README.html files
inside binaries/
Shouldn't we also remove the 29 files form dist and archive?
Once
On 27.02.2010 12:14, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Thanks for RMing and producing the Windows
On 28.02.2010 23:18, Rainer Jung wrote:
1) Logging Performance on ISAPI/Windows
The logging changes for Windows seem to dramatically slow down log
performance. That's not a problem when having only occasional info etc.,
but when switching to debug or trace log operation ow gets really slow.
E.g
601 - 700 of 2013 matches
Mail list logo
