Hi ladies,
I wanted to start a discussion about TomEE and its Java 17
compatibility.
I did some tests in one of our demo projects It looks like that "
--illegal-access=permit" was removed in Java 17, which leads to
some InaccessibleObjectException [1].
Does anybody know, if there are solutions
That's merged - thanks Rod!
Jon
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 5:40 PM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
jenki...@nationwide.com> wrote:
> Jon.
>
> One more (final maybe) PR the needs to be approved. I had to make some
> changes that Dockerhub wanted.
>
> Thanks,
> Rod.
>
>
> On 9/16/21, 6:05 AM, "Jonathan G
Related to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1432
Am Mo., 20. Sept. 2021 um 10:08 Uhr schrieb Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>:
> Hi ladies,
>
> I wanted to start a discussion about TomEE and its Java 17
> compatibility.
>
> I did some tests in one of our demo p
I had a very quick look - I wonder if we simply need to move to
MethodHandles.Lookup.defineClass():
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles.Lookup.html#defineClass-byte:A-
in the LocalBeanProxyFactory. There's likely a couple of other libraries
that TomEE uses that
I think that's the approach taken by the guys at deltaspike in Thomas'
link [1] (and the related PR in [2]).
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1432
[2] https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/pull/119
Am Montag, dem 20.09.2021 um 11:09 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> I had a
The easy fix is to replace the illegal access to - - add-opens and - -
add-exports.
The exception message includes which one is required.
Em seg., 20 de set. de 2021 07:34, Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> escreveu:
> I think that's the approach taken by the guys at deltaspike
Thanks for the additional hint. It fixes the test, but I still think,
that we should make a permanent (code-based) fix ;)
I have created a related JIRA:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3795
In addition, it looks like
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2744
is another
Hey Guys, can I help with this?
I'm not familiar with the TOMEE code base but I'm glad to help in some way.
Thanks.
El lun, 20 sept 2021 a las 5:21, Zowalla, Richard (<
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió:
> Thanks for the additional hint. It fixes the test, but I still think,
> that we sh
Hi,
My two cents...
I've tried the examples, don't know how to fix it permanently, but I've
noticed two things:
* Lombok should be upgraded to 1.18.20 to be able to compile with JDK16+ (
https://projectlombok.org/changelog )
* OrbFactory does not compile in JDK11+ as well. I don't really know if
I just tested by myself (regarding the CORBA stuff) and of course got the
issue you mentioned. Is there any alternative besides the glassfish jar you
guys might know? or do we want to remove CORBA at all?
org.glassfish.packager
glassfish-corba-omgapi
El lun, 20 sept 2021 a las 9:42
I think that there are two different ideas / thoughts in here:
(a) JDK / JRE 17 Runtime: Be able to deploy and operate a TomEE with a
Java 17 environment. This might be solvable by adding JVM options (as
mentioned by Thiago and Vicente) or doing some rework of the proxy
factory (looks like a solut
do we really need corba anymore?
Am Mo., 20. Sept. 2021 um 18:53 Uhr schrieb Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>:
> I think that there are two different ideas / thoughts in here:
>
> (a) JDK / JRE 17 Runtime: Be able to deploy and operate a TomEE with a
> Java 17 environment. This
don't know. David was hard in favour for it (feature removal in the
next major version, i.e. 9.x.x) - at least this was the discussion in
Nov 2020.
Am Montag, dem 20.09.2021 um 19:14 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> do we really need corba anymore?
>
> Am Mo., 20. Sept. 2021 um 18:53 Uhr schrie
Correction: in favour for keeping ist in 8.x.x. and maybe remove it in the next
major version. Grüess it requires a separate discussion...
Von: Zowalla, Richard
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 19:36:22
An: dev@tomee.apache.org
Betreff: Re: TomEE & Java 17
do
Hi,
I reverted Johnzon update because it seems that 1.2.11 and onward
introduced a regression.
I'll checkout with Johnzon community but I wanted to see how it looks with
1.2.10
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
All,
Dockerhub just approved the Docker images for the new TomEE 8.0.8 and, for the
1st time 9.0.0-M7.
Thanks,
Rod.
On 9/20/21, 4:44 AM, "Jonathan Gallimore" wrote:
Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use
CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachme
16 matches
Mail list logo
