Re: TOMEE-3846 flavors comparison page / TOMEE-3871 - TomEE Plume is missing BatchEE / JCS Cache

2022-03-31 Thread David Blevins
> On Mar 31, 2022, at 2:01 PM, Swell wrote: > > > It would be great to have per-major comparison pages. And in fact, there are, > but their rendering are broken. i have some free time to work on it. here are > the existing urls I thought using > >

Re: TOMEE-3846 flavors comparison page / TOMEE-3871 - TomEE Plume is missing BatchEE / JCS Cache

2022-03-31 Thread Swell
It would be great to have per-major comparison pages. And in fact, there are, but their rendering are broken. i have some free time to work on it. here are the existing urls I thought using https://tomee.apache.org/tomee-8.0/docs/comparison.html

Re: TOMEE-3846 flavors comparison page / TOMEE-3871 - TomEE Plume is missing BatchEE / JCS Cache

2022-03-31 Thread David Blevins
> On Mar 31, 2022, at 1:06 PM, Thomas Andraschko > wrote: > > +1 to remove war distribution > > AFAIR we shade Jakarta in BVal? > Otherwise i would also work on a bigbang change in BVal We tried to use the shaded version, but there were a lot of TCK test failures and only a day left to make

Re: TOMEE-3846 flavors comparison page / TOMEE-3871 - TomEE Plume is missing BatchEE / JCS Cache

2022-03-31 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 to remove war distribution AFAIR we shade Jakarta in BVal? Otherwise i would also work on a bigbang change in BVal Do we already use MyFaces 3.0 in master? David Blevins schrieb am Do., 31. März 2022, 20:19: > Thank you, Swell, for helping to get those versions aligned! > > Some high-level

Re: TomEE MicroProfile and Jakarta

2022-03-31 Thread David Blevins
It would be great to see us have compliant MicroProfile implementations somewhere in Apache; Geronimo, TomEE, CXF. It's still my personal preference -- It makes very little sense to go through the effort to create a spec and tck to enable multiple implementations that can compete/innovate and

Re: TOMEE-3846 flavors comparison page / TOMEE-3871 - TomEE Plume is missing BatchEE / JCS Cache

2022-03-31 Thread David Blevins
Thank you, Swell, for helping to get those versions aligned! Some high-level thoughts: - Romain is right that we could potentially use the TomEE-Maven-Plugin to build the various distributions. Swell also had some ideas on simplifying how the distributions are built. We've also had a couple

[GitHub] [tomee] rzo1 merged pull request #832: Regenerated BOMs after dependency upgrades

2022-03-31 Thread GitBox
rzo1 merged pull request #832: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/832 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [tomee] github-actions[bot] opened a new pull request #832: Regenerated BOMs after dependency upgrades

2022-03-31 Thread GitBox
github-actions[bot] opened a new pull request #832: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/832 Found some uncommited changes (from BOM regeneration) after running build on TomEE master -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

Re: TomEE MicroProfile and Jakarta

2022-03-31 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi JL, Think we - as a vendor - shouldn't relocate or create any TCK flavor. AFAIK Microprofile did migrate their last version to jakarta so they should have some TCK somewhere - we can use snapshots in a profile for ex. AFAIK we have some road to upgrade to last versions but it also broke

Re: TOMEE-3846 flavors comparison page

2022-03-31 Thread Zowalla, Richard
I went ahead and merged the changes by Swell. @Swell: Thank you!! Cherry picked them to master (9.x) as well. Now the distributions contain the libs specified on the website. Gruß Richard Am Montag, dem 28.03.2022 um 08:18 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > As we merged the comparision page, we

TomEE MicroProfile and Jakarta

2022-03-31 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Hi, Small update regarding jakarta namespace switch and MicroProfile. Adding Geronimo dev@list because we are using most of the Geronimo implementations In order to migrate, we have created a shaded version of all MicroProfile APIs to relocate all javax to jakarta. It worked but it's causing

[GitHub] [tomee] rzo1 merged pull request #828: TOMEE-3871 - TomEE Plume is missing BatchEE / JCS Cache

2022-03-31 Thread GitBox
rzo1 merged pull request #828: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/828 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [tomee] sultan commented on pull request #828: TOMEE-3871 - TomEE Plume is missing BatchEE / JCS Cache

2022-03-31 Thread GitBox
sultan commented on pull request #828: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/828#issuecomment-1084176117 i think i was able to clean up my mess by reverting to my previous draft. commits seems legit now. can someone launch checks ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [tomee] rzo1 commented on pull request #828: TOMEE-3871 - TomEE Plume is missing BatchEE / JCS Cache

2022-03-31 Thread GitBox
rzo1 commented on pull request #828: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/828#issuecomment-1084151416 @sultan Can you check your rebase with `tomee-8.x`. It does not look sane to me (at least judging from the changeset now). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git