Hi David,
thanks for the update.
I think it is a good idea to look at the (unreleased) JWT 2.1 while
your head is still "in the zone". Mybe you find some corner/edge/we-
dont-like things in the next spec and we can change before it happens.
Regarding your original discussion / question:
I thin
Great news! Thanks, David.
Am Freitag, dem 09.09.2022 um 20:34 -0700 schrieb David Blevins:
> > On Aug 23, 2022, at 5:39 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >
> > - jwt using TomEE implementation. 22 failures mainly key parsing
> > so not
> > a big deal. David is
Hi David,
thanks for the clean-up!
Regarding your questions:
(1) I am +1 with limiting the scope of the issue type "dependency
upgrade" to user-facing dependencies.
Sadly, we cannot add new issue types like "build/test dependency
upgrade" without involving infra but if we agree on tagging such
Hello David,
I agree that on (my) customer side, dependency upgrade of the
build/test tools aren't as important as dependency upgrades of code
actually part of TomEE runtime, so if it is possible to split the list
in release notes between runtime dependencies upgrade versus
build/test-time ones, t
> On Aug 23, 2022, at 5:39 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> - jwt using TomEE implementation. 22 failures mainly key parsing so not
> a big deal. David is on it
Down to 2 failures!
As noted in the other thread, I'm tempted to take a quick peek at implementing
the proposed MP JWT 2.1 r
> On Aug 30, 2022, at 3:10 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> I'm digging through the test failures in the MP JWT TCK and one of them is a
> test verifying support for downloading the keys for verifying JWTs via an
> http call.
>
> The trick is the test is deploying an application that makes an HTTP
Side note, I used a command-line tool I wrote called 'jamira' to file most of
these and have them appear as the person who originally filed the issue and did
the work.
A couple examples:
jamira create issue --fix-version=9.0.0-M9 --reporter=ruelland
--assignee=ruelland --type="Dependency u
Hey All,
I did some cleanup of the dependency upgrade JIRAs for 9.0.0-M8. Here's what
they look like:
• [TOMEE-3800] - Apache DBCP 2.9.0
• [TOMEE-3999] - Apache MyFaces 3.0.2
• [TOMEE-4006] - slf4j 1.7.36
• [TOMEE-4009] - WSS4J 2.4.1
• [TOMEE-4010] - xmls
rzo1 merged PR #919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/919
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomee.apache.org
For
github-actions[bot] opened a new pull request, #919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/919
Found some uncommited changes (from BOM regeneration) after running build on
TomEE main
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
rzo1 commented on PR #918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/918#issuecomment-1242342018
Thanks @sultan
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
rzo1 merged PR #918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/918
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomee.apache.org
For
sultan commented on code in PR #918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/918#discussion_r967355255
##
arquillian/arquillian-tomee-tests/arquillian-tomee-webprofile-tests/src/test/resources/hibernate-pom.xml:
##
@@ -23,11 +23,15 @@
1.0.0
hibernate-deps
+
+6.1.
rzo1 commented on code in PR #918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/918#discussion_r967344665
##
arquillian/arquillian-tomee-tests/arquillian-tomee-webprofile-tests/src/test/resources/hibernate-pom.xml:
##
@@ -23,11 +23,15 @@
1.0.0
hibernate-deps
+
+6.1.2.
rzo1 commented on PR #918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/918#issuecomment-1242303587
@dblevins I added the missing header, so we are good to move ahead here :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and us
dblevins commented on PR #918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/918#issuecomment-1242302198
> Thanks! CI is currently failing due to RAT checks on `main`. I will push a
fix shortly.
I think that's my fault. I'm happy to clean my mess if you haven't already
done it.
--
Th
Hi,
we have some pending PRs regarding the comparison pages in our docs:
- https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/917
- https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/916
- https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/915
- https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/914
Could someone with some spare cycles + spec knowle
sultan commented on PR #918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/918#issuecomment-1242285314
ok, thank you for letting me know !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
rzo1 commented on PR #918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/918#issuecomment-1242284583
Thanks! CI is currently failing due to RAT checks on `main`. I will push a
fix shortly.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
sultan commented on PR #918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/918#issuecomment-1242278914
@rzo1 it's ready
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsub
sultan opened a new pull request, #918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/918
versions of SmallRye that were RC are now stable releases.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
21 matches
Mail list logo
