rzo1 commented on PR #1090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1090#issuecomment-1881602851
Fyi @tandraschko
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsu
I've created a WIP PR which had the changes I had:
https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1090.
Still working on unit test failures, and likely isn't complete.
I'll keep plugging away, but equally happy for someone else to incorporate
this into another PR, or trash this and do something else, or wh
jgallimore opened a new pull request, #1090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1090
Rebased some old code I had prior to CDI 4 to implement the concurrency spec
changes. Still working on unit test failures, and likely isn't complete.
I'll keep plugging away, but equally happy
Hey all,
I just opened a PR to get docker images for TomEE 9.1.2 pushed:
https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/88
Would appreciate if anyone can take the time to review and possibly
merge. When this is done I'll PR docker-library/official-images as well
Thanks!
Markus
Awesome. I'll take a look.
Jon
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:50 AM Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hey Jon,
>
> your changes (if they are committed at the ee10 migrate merge) are
> basically already on "main" :)
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
> Am Montag, dem 08.01.2024 um 10:37 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
>
Hey Jon,
your changes (if they are committed at the ee10 migrate merge) are
basically already on "main" :)
Gruß
Richard
Am Montag, dem 08.01.2024 um 10:37 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> I did _some_ work on concurrency a while back. Very happy to rebase
> it -
> maybe it helps even if it is
I did _some_ work on concurrency a while back. Very happy to rebase it -
maybe it helps even if it isn't complete.
Jon
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:40 PM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) OpenJPA: couldnt we just set EclipseLink as our default for now? We dont
> need to re
@1: Maybe start a separate thread for [DISCUSSION] ? From my pov a
stable version of openjpa would be sufficient (even if it isn't
compliant)
@2: Same. Just needs a release, imho (but might depend on old stuff,
don't know)
@3:
Concurrency: You can find a DRAFT PR with the Concurrency TCK here: