Hi All,
If I run mvn -Pall-adapters test in
arquillian/arquillian-tomee-tests/arquillian-tomee-jaxrs-tests
I get the following:
[INFO] --- surefire:3.0.0-M7:test (default-test) @
arquillian-tomee-jaxrs-tests ---
[INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO]
[INFO] --- groovy:2.1.1:execute
I've managed to implement this. Thanks Jonathan for raising this, and thank
you David for the guidance. PRs incoming and I'll file a JIRA ticket.
Jon
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:34 AM Jonathan S. Fisher
wrote:
> Thanks David! I was actually experimenting with something similar,
> extending the
Congratulations Thomas, and welcome!
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 8:42 PM Richard Zowalla wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache TomEE has
> invited Thomas to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
> that he has accepted.
>
> I'm very proud to be writing this
, or whatever -
I'm happy either way.
Jon
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 11:08 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Awesome. I'll take a look.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:50 AM Richard Zowalla
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Jon,
>>
>> yo
Awesome. I'll take a look.
Jon
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:50 AM Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hey Jon,
>
> your changes (if they are committed at the ee10 migrate merge) are
> basically already on "main" :)
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
> Am Montag, dem 08.01.2024 um 1
I did _some_ work on concurrency a while back. Very happy to rebase it -
maybe it helps even if it isn't complete.
Jon
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:40 PM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) OpenJPA: couldnt we just set EclipseLink as our default for now? We dont
> need to
That should all be done. Any issues, please let me know. Thanks to everyone
for the review and votes.
Jon
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 2:04 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1s:
>
> Richard Zowalla (binding)
> Martin Wiesner
> Alex The Rocker
+1s:
Richard Zowalla (binding)
Martin Wiesner
Alex The Rocker
Jean-Louis Monteiro (binding)
Daniel Dias Dos Santos
Jonathan Gallimore (binding)
Also noting the -1 (with a ?) from Frank Jung, which has been discussed and
we'll be tackling in 9.1.3. I note that Frank has filed a JIRA here:
https
Here's my own +1 (binding).
Jon
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 4:57 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to start a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 9.1.2. TomEE
> 9.1.2 is a maintenance release with dependencies upgrades and bu
Hi All,
I'd like to start a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 9.1.2. TomEE 9.1.2
is a maintenance release with dependencies upgrades and bug fixes. It also
fixes the latest Tomcat vulnerabilities
as well as other CVEs.
###
Maven Repo:
Re-rerolling, hopefully with my GPG config sorted out, and a fix for
TOMEE-4289. New vote will be up shortly.
Jon
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:12 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to start a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 9.1.2
oks like the key used "927AEAC4B9AD730DEC3BB2319969E985B1A390A9" to
> sign the artifacts isn't available
> in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>
> Can you update the file?
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
> Am Donnerstag, dem 07.12.2023 um 14:12 + schrieb Jonathan
> Gallimore:
Hi All,
I'd like to start a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 9.1.2. TomEE 9.1.2
is a maintenance release with dependencies upgrades and bug fixes. It also
fixes the latest Tomcat vulnerabilities
as well as other CVEs.
###
Maven Repo:
> Richard
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 06.12.2023 um 15:10 +0000 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> > Ok - is there anything else we want to try and pull in before I cut a
> > release? I note there's 3 PRs here for main from the last couple of
> > weeks -
> > should any b
;
> Am Freitag, dem 01.12.2023 um 16:02 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> > I've merged in a fix for CVE-2023-46589, and a test for it. I'll kick
> > off a
> > release either over the weekend if I get time, or on Monday. Let me
> > know if
> > there's any objecti
023-46589 which is
> fairly new
>
> Le mer. 29 nov. 2023 à 12:51, Richard Zowalla a écrit :
> >
> > +1 and yes, CVE-2023-46589 is missing.
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 29.11.2023 um 11:23 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
+1
I think there's one CVE to patch before release: CVE-2023-46589 which I'm
happy to do. I'm also happy to cut the release as its been a while since I
last did it.
Jon
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:20 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are a couple of
/www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:48 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I make these changes to 9.x and main - is there any objection to
> making the
> > > change to 8.x as well?
&
I make these changes to 9.x and main - is there any objection to making the
change to 8.x as well?
Thanks
Jon
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:28 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback, and especially the pointer to the JIRA!
>
> Jon
>
+1
Thanks for doing the release, Jonathan!
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 6:35 PM Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the second attempt for a vote for a release of Apache TomEE
> 8.0.16. The first vote was cancelled due to some issues with the BOM
> modules.
>
> I'd like to start with a big
e calling for a vote or what not... sorry I'm new here!
> https://tomee.apache.org/dev/release-tomee.html
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:11 PM Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Jonathan. If it helps, the changeset from 5.17.5 to 5.17.6 isn't
> > massive:
be a bit nervous :) I'll go ahead
> release:perform but stop again before closing the repository.
>
> I'll try running this too with some of our bigger apps and see if I
> can find anything wrong.
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 3:58 PM Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
> >
>
Those should be there for 8.0.x, 9.1.x and 10.0.x (I think you merged the
PR for 8.0.x yourself :-) )
Jon
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 9:56 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It should be done by the build, but I can do that and push it as well.
>
> Jon
>
It should be done by the build, but I can do that and push it as well.
Jon
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 9:55 PM Jonathan S. Fisher
wrote:
> Thanks, do we need to do the bom thing?
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 3:53 PM Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
> >
> > Done:
> >
>
Done:
https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/c63eacac4956c29454a0efc3e75e933dd4316b26
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 9:46 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks. That commit is incoming in about 1 minute.
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 9:43
Thanks. That commit is incoming in about 1 minute.
Jon
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 9:43 PM Jonathan S. Fisher
wrote:
> No problemo. I'll cancel, do the pr two step, and rebuild
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 3:39 PM Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
> >
> > I was about to ask
I was about to ask the same. Happy to push the update to the branch before
a release is kicked off.
Jon
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023, 21:23 Alex The Rocker, wrote:
> Hi
>
> Before it's too late, can 8.0.16 release include (if not already done)
> the dependency update to ActiveMQ version fixing
.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE/issues/TOMEE-4242
>
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 25.10.2023 um 15:19 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> > I'm hoping the URLClassLoaderFirst change would mean that the slf4j-
> > api
> > 1.7.x could keep working for you. I'd be happy to add an Arquil
including logback, that transitive
> dependency ought to be blocked... it's up to the final developer to
> decide which binding implementation to use. Including a binding (over
> the default sysout binding) would likely cause problems for users.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at
Hi All
There's a couple of suggestions I'd like to run past the group to see if
there's any thoughts / potential issues.
The first is: updating to SLF4J 2.x API and JUL implementation
(specifically 2.0.9) in TomEE. There's a couple of rationale here:
- The 1.x branch of SLF4J is no longer
+1, and great work, thank you!
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 5:55 PM Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hey ladies,
>
> some good news:
>
> We are now passing the JAX-RS part of the EE9.1 tck with the latest CXF
> 4.0.3-SNAPSHOT [1]. Don't bother about the json-p failures, which are
> unrelated (they are also
One of the things I've been looking into recently is the number of
connections that TomEE will make to an ActiveMQ broker. If you consider an
application that has 10 Message Driven Beans, and another bean that sends
messages using a connection factory, that application when started will
make 20
I very much agree with specifying where you're willing to spend your time,
as opposed to just what you'd like to see.
- TomEE 10: I'm happy to contribute to the development of that as I can.
I'm currently working on the concurrency changes needed for EE10.
- TomEE 9: I'm happy to contribute
+1 (binding)
Additional comment is that we seem to have a few API jars creeping in,
which should be part of the javaee-api jar:
* geronimo-jta_1.1_spec
* jakarta.annotation-api
* jakarta.jws-api
* jakarta.xml.soap-api
* jakarta.xml.ws-api
Not a blocker for release in my opinion, but worth
I've started wiring up the Concurrency TCK here:
https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/TOMEE-4159_Concurrency_TCK. After
updating the Jakarta EE API to 10, there are some compile issues,
particularly around the concurrency area, so there is some work to do
(which I'm looking at now!).
Cheers
Jon
Awesome, thanks - that's all assigned.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 7:23 PM Zoltán Tichov
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It is "eagleegg".
>
> Thanks:
>
> Zoltán
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 8:17 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote
Can you let me know your JIRA username?
Thanks
Jon
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, 19:14 Jonathan Gallimore,
wrote:
> Yes. I'll see if I can assign that to you.
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, 18:15 Zoltán Tichov, wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Can I choose the Jakart
Yes. I'll see if I can assign that to you.
Jon
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, 18:15 Zoltán Tichov, wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can I choose the Jakarta Faces TCK?
>
> Thanks:
> Zoltán
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:06 AM David Blevins
> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 5, 2023, at 11:11 AM, Zoltán Tichov
> > wrote:
> > >
>
I was pretty interested in this too. I'll pick one of the JIRA and have a
look.
Jon
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 2:24 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro
wrote:
> I worked on BVal and CDI and we have work to do for both before we can
> merge the corresponding PRs.
>
> I looked at other candidates and it looks
+1, with the note that we seem to have a number of bcprov jars included:
* bcprov-jdk15on-1.70.jar
* bcprov-jdk15to18-1.70.jar
* bcprov-jdk18on-1.71.jar
Not sure if that is intended, but maybe needs some cleanup for the next
release.
Jon
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:53 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro
+1.
Jon
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 11:32 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to vote Apache TomEE Patch Plugin 0.10 up for vote. The changes
> are fairly minimal and consist of patching the source jar so that IDE isn't
> lost. This release is required so we
Hi
I've been enjoying participating in the MicroProfile Metrics spec group,
working on version 5 of the spec which is part of MicroProfile 6.
Additionally, I have worked with some of the participants on SmallRye
metrics to implement this - as you may recall we have switched over to
SmallRye to
Hi folks
I've had a situation where if a component in the webapp part of an
EAR-based application performs a lookup programmatically to a CDI bean, and
that bean belongs to the EJB part of the EAR application, there's a
performance issue, versus older versions of TomEE. Essentially the OWB code
+1
Jon
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:06 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed, here is the vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0.RC1. This is a
> release candidate implementing Jakarta EE 9.1 and MicroProfile 5. It is
> fully passing MicroProfile 5 TCK and only
Taking the commands very literally, the timings for 2 machines here are
below. I'm curious though - are there any JAVA_OPTS or MAVEN_OPTS we should
use here (e.g. max heap)? The slower machine here seems to be running at an
absolute crawl 2/3rds of the way through the build here with the default
> Not only it is ridiculous to have two JSON processing stacks cohexisting
in TomEE, but also, looking at
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.johnzon/johnzon-core, there
was no CVE on Johnzon for the part 5 years ; versus a huge number of CVE on
Jackson for the same period:
I'm a +1 for Krazo, in fact I think MVC is now part of the spec so its
needed. It _might_ have already been done. I'm a little more on the fence
for Deltaspike. I really like it, and use it in my own projects. My
question would be, what other dependencies does it bring in, and what is
the overall
+1. And yes, this willinclude the fix to mitigate CVE-2021-43980.
Jon
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 6:45 PM Alex The Rocker
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> +1 for a TomEE 8.013 ASAP provided it includes fix for:
>
> CVE-2021-43980 Apache Tomcat - Information Disclosure
>
> Kind regards,
> Alex
>
> Le mer. 28
+1
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 4:54 PM Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to get the community's opinion on renaming the "master"
> branches for the TomEE related repositories to "main".
>
> I see quite a few ASF projects (and other OSS projects) have made the
> change and I
My general thoughts on this are:
* While I understand the desire for a patched release, forking the CXF
project feels like a lot of work, particularly if we're only looking to do
one final release from this branch. I personally would prefer to spend my
time working on Jakarta EE 9/10 support and
+1
Couple of notes:
* woodstox-core appears to have gone _back_ some versions (6.2.4 -> 5.2.1)
* something is pulling in ASM as opposed to using the xbean-asm9-shaded
I don't think either of these should block the release, but we ought to
have a look as development moves forward.
Thanks for
+1
Jon
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 1:43 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed, here is the vote for Apache TomEE 8.0.12.
>
> This is a maintenance release with minor fixes and dependencies upgrades.
>
> Maven staging repo
>
Yes, it looks like Jean-Louis has prepared everything for release. This
specific JIRA looks like it should have been closed back in 8.0.6, and has
been updated as part of a bulk update to issues for the last few releases -
that's my mistake, sorry. I've corrected the JIRA. For info, the commit is
I'm ok with it. Thanks Jean-Louis.
Jon
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 4:17 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We do have an uber jar with all Java/Jakarta EE APIs. It makes it easier
> for a user to use the server and requires less dependencies in our modules.
>
>
Hi Zoltán
I've assigned that JIRA to you.
Many thanks
Jon
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 9:14 AM Zoltán Tichov
wrote:
> Hi David!
>
> My JIRA username is eagleegg
>
> Thanks: Zoltán
>
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:27 AM David Blevins
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Zoltán!
> >
> > Absolutely, you're welcome to
+1
Jon
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 10:01 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to vote Apache TomEE Patch Plugin 0.9 up for vote. The changes are
> fairly minimal and are meant to help with Maven new versions.
>
> Again, big thank you Richard for putting this
e it imho from 8.x as we do not test with
> it and the transformed samples might not even work, e.g. dependencies
> are not migrated, etc.
>
> +1 for providing a (bigger) example.
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 04.05.2022 um 11:17 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimor
I've picked up a task related to the examples:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3873. I specifically went for
this, as I added the Eclipse Transformer to the build for a number of
examples in the past, back when we were doing the transformation process on
TomEE itself. The drawbacks
+1
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, 10:19 Jean-Louis Monteiro,
wrote:
> Eclipse is fine.
> Thanks
>
> Le jeu. 28 avr. 2022 à 01:22, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
> jenki...@nationwide.com> a écrit :
>
> > All,
> >
> > I was notified of the pull request below. Long story short: We need to
> > choose a
Looks like I missed Richard's email yesterday and he's already taken care
of it. Thanks Richard, and sorry for the noise.
Jon
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 4:30 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like we're top of the list, and not in a good way... :/
>
Looks like we're top of the list, and not in a good way... :/
I'm happy to help, but not sure where to start. Does anyone have any
pointers?
Jon
-- Forwarded message -
From: Gavin McDonald
Date: Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 8:27 AM
Subject: ci-builds all 3.6TB disk is full!
To: builds
+1
Thanks Richard and Jean-Louis!
Jon
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is the first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 8.0.11
>
> I'd like to start with a big thank you and a big applause to Richard. He
> has
Hi,
I've pushed what I hope is a relatively straightforward, but also hopefully
useful piece of functionality.
If you consider an application that has a MDB that listens on a Topic, by
default, TomEE will use the MDB name as the Client ID that it uses to
connect to ActiveMQ. You can override
That approach works great. thanks David. I'll have a test committed this
afternoon!
Jon
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 4:59 PM David Blevins
wrote:
> > On Mar 7, 2022, at 7:27 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently lookin
Hi All,
While looking at straightforward remote EJB lookup and invocation via https
in Wireshark, it looks like a different connection is being used each time,
which is causing a SSL handshake and knock-on performance impact. I've
committed a fix for this, which is to make sure the response is
+1
Jon
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 8:54 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 8.0.10
>
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1193/
>
> Binaries & Source:
>
},
merge this in, and set about updating some of the documentation to
reference it.
Let me know if you have any objections to that.
Thanks
Jon
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 2:31 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a PR for the site ge
That sounds like a good proposal to me, and I'm happy to help test.
Jon
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 5:28 PM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
jenki...@nationwide.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would vote in favor of supporting arm64. The question for me is how
> deep do we go? I propose 8 and 9 with java
+1 (binding).
Jon
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 12:24 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 8.0.8.
>
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1188
>
> Binaries &
Hi All,
I have a slightly odd scenario, where I have an EAR file, with a library in
the EAR's lib folder, which has a Singleton EJB, which is annotated
with @Startup.
The code in question is a common library shared between a number of
applications. Where I want the bean to be used, I define it
I had a very quick look - I wonder if we simply need to move to
MethodHandles.Lookup.defineClass():
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles.Lookup.html#defineClass-byte:A-
in the LocalBeanProxyFactory. There's likely a couple of other libraries
that TomEE uses that
ll release. I am not even sure they will 9.0.0-M7 without the
> key. We
> > will see.
> >
> >
> > Please approve this PR:
> > https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/53
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rod.
> >
> >
>
Ah, perfect. Thanks for letting me know!
Jon
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:00 PM Matthew Broadhead
wrote:
> sorry i forgot to follow up. docker was running out of disk space. it
> is working now
>
> On 16/09/2021 13:02, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> > Thanks for the stacktrace -
he key. We
> will see.
>
>
> Please approve this PR:
> https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/53
>
> Thanks,
> Rod.
>
>
>
> On 9/15/21, 9:46 AM, "Jonathan Gallimore"
> wrote:
>
> Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXT
t.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624),
>
> org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61),
>
> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> 08-Sep-2021 10:47:07.079 INFO [ajp-nio-0.0.0.0-8009-exec-37]
> org.apache.geronimo.connector
That's merged, thanks Rod!
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:04 PM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
jenki...@nationwide.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have posed 8.0.8 to tomitribe/docker-tomee
>
> A few notes about this release..
>
> 1) I had to move away from the keys. I just could not get them to test.
> We
+1
Jon
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 2:49 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 8.0.8.
>
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1186
>
> Binaries & Source:
>
Hi Matthew,
Its not a JAAS login module, but take a look at
https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/examples/mp-rest-jwt-public-key
- the ability to validate access via a JWT was introduced in MicroProfile
fairly early on.
Jon
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 8:29 AM Matthew Broadhead
wrote:
> Is
ainer/openejb-core/src/test/java/org/apache/openejb/config/ConnectorProxyTest.java
> >
> >
> > I can't get any of my other tests running since I added the RA. it
> > just blows up :(
> >
> > On 28/06/2021 23:32, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> >> Do you have a
; Jon,
>
> I will get started on that. I will move to SHA512 and should be able to
> release 9.0.
>
> Thanks,
> Rod.
>
> From: Jonathan Gallimore
> Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 at 11:49 AM
> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Docker image change req
it is simpler to use the SHA and seems to be more reliable.
>
> I have a PR request out there to remove the windows files. David did give
> me access to approve that, but I am assuming that we would prefer someone
> else to approve it.
>
> I will start on a list of new tags to a
Hi Rod,
Can you elaborate on what the keyserver issue is? That sounds like the
immediate blocker.
We publish SHA512 checksums so I'm fine with using them, although a GPG
check is also nice.
I'm a +1 on the additional tags, and removing the .exes from the bin
directory.
Jon
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021
TestReference.run(JUnit5TestReference.java:98)
> at
>
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:40)
> at
>
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:541)
> at
>
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(R
Managed to figure out my config mistakes, and pushed an example with the
resource adapter embedded in the .war file:
https://github.com/apache/tomee-chatterbox/commit/18290594eb924c0a0625f7560e096635d8b92416
Hope that helps!
Jon
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:14 PM Jonathan Gallimore
rbox
> or https://github.com/apache/tomee-chatterbox ? it is by no means
> complete but it allows me to set ackWait and durableName
>
>
> On 17/06/2021 15:37, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:48 PM Matthew Broadhead
> > wrote:
> >
t;> }
> >> }, new
> >>
> SubscriptionOptions.Builder().startWithLastReceived().manualAcks().ackWait(Duration.ofSeconds(60))
> >> .durableName("scheduler-service").build());
> >>
> >> On 16/06/2021 16:43, Jonathan Ga
Pushed. I've made client Id and cluster id configuration options and added
a README. If it working for you, I'd suggest we cut a 0.3 release unless
there are any objections.
Jon
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:16 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry
e parameters in a similar way to how it is
> done in the chatterbox-imap? sending them in from the tomee.xml?
>
>
> On 10/06/2021 19:07, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> > Thank you! That worked. I have pushed an update to my code, and I've been
> > able to send a message to NA
> but you could change the docker-compose.yml to have a -cid of
> yourclusterid and then do this
>
> StreamingConnectionFactory cf = new
> StreamingConnectionFactory(new
> Options.Builder().natsUrl("nats://localhost:4222")
> .clusterId("yourclusterid").clientI
Thanks. If I can get that test going, I can probably get the rest working.
I suspect there are some other bugs in there.
Jon
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:04 PM Matthew Broadhead
wrote:
> Thanks I will have a look now
>
> On 09/06/2021 15:19, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> > Ok, I'm s
xseeEWMIAL.F0vVy1N0sQM3xseeEWMISH 75
>
>.yourclientid.._INBOX.LP4bdY88abuVJ19Qo5HVn8..".LP4bdY88abuVJ19Qo5HVjK(.0.
PONG
>UNSUB 1
>UNSUB 2
>UNSUB 3
So there does appear to be some communication between my test and the NATS
server - I have no idea why it times out.
My code is h
Nervermind, I figured out my mistake. I'll post back when I have something
going.
Jon
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:44 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I have something wired up, but when executing this:
>
>
LC_ALL: en_GB.UTF-8
> >> ports:
> >> - '4222:4222'
> >> - '8222:8222'
> >> expose:
> >> - 4222
> >> - 8222
> >> networks:
> >> - backend
> >> networks:
> >
At the risk of sounding a bit ignorant... what is NATS?
>From what I can tell, it sounds like you're receiving a stream of events
(over websocket) and want to do some processing in an EJB or CDI bean for
each event. The connection to the NATS server isn't in the context of a
HTTP (or any other
I went ahead and merged this. Please let me know if it causes and problems,
I'll be happy to revert and look again.
Jon
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:25 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I noticed an issue with injecting a WebServiceConte
Hi All,
I noticed an issue with injecting a WebServiceContext into a field
using @Resource when the endpoint uses CDI interceptors. I've created a PR
with a test and fix. Essentially, the field is being injected into the OWB
proxy, but being accessed from the underlying instance (resulting in a
(probably access-related) issues in
> > LocalBeanProxyFactory.createProxy(...) which might have lead to the
> > crash in the actual project.
> >
> > It can be found here: https://github.com/rzo1/jdk16-testing
> >
> > Gruss
> > Richard
> >
>
k.net/?variant=openjdk16=hotspot) on a
> Ubuntu 20.04 LTS system.
>
> If it helps: I could try to create a minimal example to reproduce the
> crash and push it to Github.
>
> Gruss
> Richard
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2021, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> >
I did some of the original work on LocalBeanProxyFactory way back. I'm
happy to take a look. Are you building your own JDK from source, or
downloading a specific binary (if so, which one)?
Jon
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:07 AM Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
I'd prefer option A.
Jon
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 12:05 AM David Blevins
wrote:
> Please see Rob Tompkins' email "[jarkarta-ee] Is there apatite to ever use
> Jakarta EE logos on the TomEE site"
>
> This vote is strictly limited to 1) getting Jakarta EE Platform and
> Jakarta EE Web Profile
1 - 100 of 1238 matches
Mail list logo
