Re: Site NG on github

Oh So it is not a tool but a process. I see. Sounds very tempting to be honest bit also think we should wait "after summer" to not change all at once. What do you think? Le 5 juil. 2017 02:21, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > Romain, > > For the site generation, if you want

Re: Site NG on github

Romain, For the site generation, if you want to switch to gitwcsub (and dump the SVN repo) its simply a matter of having a job (buildbot or jenkins) that will build the commit and push the result to a special branch (most are using asf-site). Since you're already using mvn to generate the site,

Re: Site NG on github

should have all the needed content now, mvn compile to generate the site mvn pre-site to publish it on staging Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

Re: Site NG on github

*typo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-site-generator.git is the right one Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github |

Re: Site NG on github

imported the generator in https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-tomee-site-generator.git, will push a warning in the svn project for now and we can delete it later Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old

Re: Site NG on github

Ok submitted https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-tomee-site-generator.git, @John: do you have more details about gitwcsub, didnt find much except it is the git replacement of svnpubsub? idea would be to sync a generated folder with the remote "content" repo. Very worse case I can add it

Re: Site NG on github

Would be better to request a git repo via https://reporeq.apache.org/ if you want a repository. You may also want to consider using gitwcsub instead of svnpubsub for the actual generated site. John On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Ok, let say

Re: Site NG on github

Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask it - it doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it is a concern at any level. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: Site NG on github

+1 On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: > I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to date. > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha > wrote: > > > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need

Re: Site NG on github

As in +1 for moving the project :-) On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho > wrote: > >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to date.

Re: Site NG on github

I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to date. On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha wrote: > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN. > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last Jean-Louis's merge. > > But

Re: Site NG on github

Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN. PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last Jean-Louis's merge. But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage and the process to deploy in prod will be identical. +1 for that. On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56

Re: Site NG on github

This would be great, way better than doing svn patches. +1 On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it looks hard, > they propose us to move the project to another git repo. > >

Site NG on github

Hi guys, I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github but it looks hard, they propose us to move the project to another git repo. Anyone against it? For reference here is the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249 Concretely we would get a