Probably worth a read:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-next-tomee-version-targetting-EE-7-td4674650.html
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Java-EE-version-Alignment-Troubles-td4674796.html
And related if you still feel motivated by reading after these pages ;)
Le mar. 20
Nevermind, that was just a discussion because I had the idea that the Jakarta
EE version was going to reset. This is not the case, so doesn’t make sense
anymore.
> On 19 Nov 2018, at 23:08, exabrial12 wrote:
>
> Roberto, I'd advise to stick to https://semver.org semantics:
>
> It's worth a r
Roberto, I'd advise to stick to https://semver.org semantics:
It's worth a read at the link, but:
major.minor.patch
* major is API breaking changes, so removing an API or class
* minor is adding a new API or feature, or marking a public API as
deprecated, in a non-breaking manner
* patch is bug
Very well, sorry for misleading then.
At some point, I’ve got the impression it was going to be 1.0 and reset. I
should have checked that.
> On 19 Nov 2018, at 22:13, Richard Monson-Haefel
> wrote:
>
> Jakarta EE is not going to reset back to 1.0. It's going to carry on from
> where Java EE l
Jakarta EE is not going to reset back to 1.0. It's going to carry on from
where Java EE left off. In fact, the first release of Jakarta EE will be
version 8 and will be identical to Java EE 8. Jakarta will then to go
version 9, 10, etc.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:56 PM Roberto Cortez
wrote:
> We
Well that is the thing.
Some time ago, we aligned TomEE version to be the same as EE. Now, Jakarta is
going to reset the versions back to 1.0 as far as I know, so we don’t have that
link anymore, and we can’t really go back on versions, so I guess we need to do
something like:
Version x.y.z
x
+1
better to use this versioning scheme - and wait for Jakarta EE9 to jump to
TomEE9.x
Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 21:38 Uhr schrieb exabrial12 :
> What does everyone think about about small releases (8.0.x, 8.1.x, 8.2.x)
> with each Minor (middle) number adds a new API? Once we get to all the
> des
What does everyone think about about small releases (8.0.x, 8.1.x, 8.2.x)
with each Minor (middle) number adds a new API? Once we get to all the
desired API level we could issue an LTS (so declare that 8.6.x would be like
Java11 support, MP, and JEE8, plus it'd be around for awhile). This sort of
m
+1
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:40 AM Roberto Cortez
wrote:
> I’ve got some feedback that people enjoyed having WebProfile +
> MicroProfile. If you strictly look just into the MP spec, sure you can
> develop an app with that, but most likely you will be requiring other stuff.
>
> Unless there is a
I’ve got some feedback that people enjoyed having WebProfile + MicroProfile. If
you strictly look just into the MP spec, sure you can develop an app with that,
but most likely you will be requiring other stuff.
Unless there is a high demand of having just a MP flavour, I think we are ok.
Regard
No this is a different flavor.
It is based on webprofile though
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 5:33 PM exabrial12 wrote:
> Is MP support only in a WebProfile release currently?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-o
Is MP support only in a WebProfile release currently?
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
"Actually, kinda interested. I think we'd need to include MicroProfile in
TomEE Plus and TomEE Plume though."
I'm totally agree.
Do we already have the CI running TomEE build with java 11?
Em seg, 19 de nov de 2018 às 13:14, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Java 11
Java 11 is definitely a priority. Personally, I'd rather get a regular
milestone releases, rather than waiting for everything Java 11-wise to be
in place.
Jon
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:03 PM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not a commiter but a full java11 support is
I'm not a commiter but a full java11 support is very important.
But probably all open stories are very important :D
Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:46 Uhr schrieb Roberto Cortez
:
> Hi folks,
>
> Following up our initial push to have a Milestone Release of TomEE 8, I
> think we need to figure out th
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:54 PM Bruno Baptista wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like the idea of more releases and incrementally add more features in
> a planned way.
>
> Also, what do you guys think of slimming the microprofile flavor by
> removing some non microprofile specs from it like JPA and such?
>
Act
Hi,
I like the idea of more releases and incrementally add more features in
a planned way.
Also, what do you guys think of slimming the microprofile flavor by
removing some non microprofile specs from it like JPA and such?
Cheers
Bruno Baptista
http://twitter.com/brunobat_
On 19/11/18 15
Hi folks,
Following up our initial push to have a Milestone Release of TomEE 8, I think
we need to figure out the remaining steps to a final version:
- Update MP specs to the latests and support at least MP 2.0 spec.
- Provide MP support for other TomEE flavours: Plus, Plume, etc.
- Implement J
18 matches
Mail list logo
