Re: [tools-dev] OOo source split

2007-10-10 Thread Mathias Bauer
Rüdiger Timm wrote: > Personally, I do not like spitting up sources at all. But that's my very > personal opinion. Splitting up source definitely is a good idea. Maybe not for people building everything anyway but it would be a huge step ahead for the casual developer like volunteers, distro mai

Re: [tools-dev] OOo source split

2007-10-10 Thread Rüdiger Timm
Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Ruediger, I am sorry, I missed a part of the mail when I was answering previously :-( No problem. On Monday 08 October 2007 17:36, Rüdiger Timm wrote: This would tremendously decrease the learning curve for the new developers as well. Imagine someone who wants

Re: [tools-dev] Re: [dev] Is someone still building OOo with tcsh?

2007-10-10 Thread Volker Quetschke
Yuri Dario wrote: > Hi Volker, > >> free software. I thought your OS/2 environment is unix-like? Did you >> ever try to use USE_SHELL=bash? > > when I started porting, the only shell choices were tcsh and 4nt; since > the first one was not available and porting it was not simple, I used > 4nt/4os

Re: [tools-dev] Re: [dev] Is someone still building OOo with tcsh?

2007-10-10 Thread Yuri Dario
Hi Volker, >free software. I thought your OS/2 environment is unix-like? Did you >ever try to use USE_SHELL=bash? when I started porting, the only shell choices were tcsh and 4nt; since the first one was not available and porting it was not simple, I used 4nt/4os2 because they are free software u

Re: [tools-dev] Re: [dev] Is someone still building OOo with tcsh?

2007-10-10 Thread Volker Quetschke
Yuri Dario wrote: > Hello, > >> Hamburg uses [...] 4nt for Windows builds of OOo. > > 4nt is used also to drive the OS/2 build system; it is named 4os2 here > (and is open source software), but OS/2 scripts uses '4nt' to be > compatible with existing makefiles. Well, for W32 builds both bash and

Re: [tools-dev] Re: [dev] Is someone still building OOo with tcsh?

2007-10-10 Thread Volker Quetschke
Hi Rüdiger, > Volker Quetschke wrote: >> [...] >> >> Hamburg uses [...] 4nt for Windows builds of OOo. I know, and I didn't propose to scrap the 4nt usage, I am pretty confident that it is OK and probably better checked than the W32-bash builds. (I don't recommend the usage of W32-tcsh anymore as

Re: [tools-dev] Re: [dev] Is someone still building OOo with tcsh?

2007-10-10 Thread Yuri Dario
Hello, > Hamburg uses [...] 4nt for Windows builds of OOo. 4nt is used also to drive the OS/2 build system; it is named 4os2 here (and is open source software), but OS/2 scripts uses '4nt' to be compatible with existing makefiles. Bye, Yuri Dario /* * member of TeamOS/2 - Italy * ht

[tools-dev] Re: [dev] Is someone still building OOo with tcsh?

2007-10-10 Thread Rüdiger Timm
Volker Quetschke wrote: [...] Hamburg uses [...] 4nt for Windows builds of OOo. The "community" uses bash[*] for all OOo builds and discourages the use of 4nt. This frequently leads to broken milestones for the community that seem to build fine and are OKed by RE and QA. That is a known pr