Re: [tools-dev] Re: Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2010-01-27 Thread Mathias Bauer
Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 01/27/10 09:07, Mathias Bauer wrote: >> Jussi Pakkanen wrote: >>> Yes, sure. If and only if you have target_link_libraries(some_exe >>> some_library) then the linker invocation for some_exe will have >>> '-lsome_library'. Whether or not it was built accidentally, CMake

Re: [tools-dev] Re: Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2010-01-27 Thread Jussi Pakkanen
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: > The parallelization comes from the build.pl. Let's go back to our simple > example with the 4 libraries/modules. When build.pl is called to build > D, it discovers it has to build B and C before (as the build.lst of D > tells so). And as B

Re: [tools-dev] Re: Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2010-01-27 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 01/27/10 09:07, Mathias Bauer wrote: Jussi Pakkanen wrote: Yes, sure. If and only if you have target_link_libraries(some_exe some_library) then the linker invocation for some_exe will have '-lsome_library'. Whether or not it was built accidentally, CMake will not link the exe against the libr

Re: [tools-dev] Re: Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2010-01-27 Thread Mathias Bauer
Jussi Pakkanen wrote: > BTW, what does the GNU Make solution use for platform configuration? > Autoconf? Some in-house tool? We didn't want to change that - so far it's planned to be the same stuff as today (calling our configure script). >> Of course, TANSTAAFL: I'm sure we will be the first to