On 02/02/10 10:05, Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
Another point is However, there are many cases where the current
build process depends on a large set of external tools like bash, awk,
findutils, coreutils. Does the actual building require these or is it
more of a case of need these, because
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:05:26 +0200
Jussi Pakkanen jpakk...@gmail.com wrote:
There are some inconsistencies with the page. I'll post them here
rather than directly to the page to prevent an editing war.
Firstly under dependencies it says [CMake] is not usually available
on the default
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:08 PM, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems -
Hamburg Germany bjoern.michael...@sun.com wrote:
Firstly under dependencies it says [CMake] is not usually available
on the default install of many platforms. and then a bit further down
One might consider using Python as a
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:21:24 +0200
Jussi Pakkanen jpakk...@gmail.com wrote:
No I did not, but despite that it somewhat harsh to imply that CMake
is hard to get or install. Getting it is roughly as hard as getting a
compiler (buying full registered versions of MSVC notwithstanding).
On
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote:
I started a new wikipage here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_Environment_Effort/New_Build_System_Requirements
collecting the major requirements for a new build system and what needs
to be
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
Another point is However, there are many cases where the current
build process depends on a large set of external tools like bash, awk,
findutils, coreutils. Does the actual building require these or is it
more of a case of need these, because dmake/build.pl needs these?
