Also, wanted to point out that it appears that Apache Spark does not
require the ICLA:
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Spark-Contribution-tp7935p7972.html
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark#ContributingtoSpark-ContributingCodeChanges
I agree with starting the version from scratch. Needing to keep Toree in
line with the Spark version is difficult and limits us to the revision
versions.
Furthermore, now that we work as a Spark Submit application and use SPARK
HOME to identify the Apache Spark version to use, I don't see the need
I know that Apache Spark uses Jenkins with a plugin in Github to allow them
to manually invoke Jenkins testing against PRs.
Do we want something similar (or do we have it already) for Toree?
Currently, we use Travis CI, which is free for open source projects. I
don't know off the top of my head if
Currently, we do not publish any binaries to Maven Central. It would be
nice to take a look at doing this. There was an issue on Github to deal
with this. We can move the discussion here now.
We need to refactor the project's org to org.apache and the artifacts to
toree- instead of just . E.g. the
Anyone else notice that the Toree icon is broken on non-homepage links?
http://toree.apache.org/community/
http://toree.apache.org/community-members/
It's using a relative url of "assets/themes/apache/img/logo.png", which
breaks when going into subdirectories like community and community-members.
at as an option.
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I know that Apache Spark uses Jenkins with a plugin in Github to allow
> > them
> > > to manually invoke Jenkins te
The project and its associated issues are in the process of being moved to
Apache, but you can find the current source on Github:
https://github.com/ibm-et/spark-kernel
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:54 PM Kasper Sørensen <
i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Toree team,
>
> I'm trying to get a
@lresende, just wanted to check in about the state of merging the PR that
Gino mentioned. Submitter claims to have signed the ICLA; so, we need to
know whether or not we should wait until after the move to roll it in. This
also brings up if there is a way for submitters to not need to sign the
ICLA
So, this may be documented somewhere, but I'm not sure where to look. How
do we gain write access to the git repository? I (and several others) are
still waiting to hear back from the secretary about the ICLA. I'm assuming
access has something to do with the Apache id, but I don't know what you
nee
Is there a timeline for when the issue tracker will be available for Toree?
Is there something we haven't done yet?
Currently, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE gives me a "Project
does not exist" message.
nted of a tool Apache has to port Issues into JIRA. I mentioned
> to him that if it was easy, than then porting the issues would be good and
> we would then go through them and clean them up.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
&
er (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10144 ) but that was from
> their own atlassian instance.
>
> — Hitesh
>
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 6:58 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > +1 to that. Any automation would be a great help. Going back and closing
> > ones we don't
; > > >
> > > > > The Apex folks went through a complex import earlier (
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10144 ) but that was
> > from
> > > > > their own atlassian instance.
> > > > >
>
Oh, I assumed you had all of the usernames for pmc members since they were
supposed to email you their IDs, right? Would it make sense to list them
here? Or for each of us to comment on the JIRA itself?
I've been getting emails when others got their accounts set up and the only
one I haven't seen
My jira id is senkwich. Please add me (Chip Senkbeil) as well.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:01 AM Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 19, 2016, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > Oh, I assumed you had all of the usernames for pmc members since they
> were
> > suppose
the apache github is read only replicated from the apache git repo.)
> >
> > > On Jan 8, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Chip Senkbeil
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From there, I see there is better integration with Github that can be
> > used
> > > if you opt-
> > >> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Gino Bustelo wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> @lresende It does not seem that I have the ability to assign issues.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Gino Bustelo
> > >> wrote:
> >
he.org/infra/entry/apache_gains_additional_travis_ci, it
> seems that it is a shared apache account.
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Luciano Resende
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> > wrote:
> >
> > > So, I'm trying
Trying to read through phone, but I noticed that it is implemented in C.
We're using JeroMQ to avoid depending on a binary and JNI. If they don't
have a Java API, I'd say no.
Don't know if it is compatible with ZeroMQ, which we need to maintain
support for Jupyter. Would need to take a deeper look
Looked at the ZeroMQ link. They state it is not fully compatible with
ZeroMQ, but is fully POSIX compliant. We'd have to dig into all ZeroMQ apis
used by Jupyter to make sure we supported everything.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016, 12:38 PM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Trying to read through phon
I discovered a few projects planning to move away from sbt to use this
library, which can fetch dependencies from Maven/Ivy repos:
https://github.com/alexarchambault/coursier
Apache 2.0 license and it seems dead simple compared to our existing logic,
which is a bit of a hack involving writing an
To all mentors, are we supposed to have (or be able to get) administrative
access to the Github mirror? Without it, we cannot refresh failed Travis
builds or perform other tooling operations, although I've managed to get
the repo enabled for Travis CI.
On a JIRA I opened awhile ago asking for admi
eamlined once I figure
out if we can do everything through sbt. Seems like a lot of steps, though.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:17 PM Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > Currently, we do not publish any binaries to Maven Central. It wo
Just a heads up. I opened an issue against Spark about exposing some of the
SparkR APIs. They are too restrictive on what the SparkR libraries allows
(no custom Java methods) and the R backend is package protected.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13573
Our SparkR implementation is a f
2:14 PM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Just a heads up. I opened an issue against Spark about exposing some of
> the SparkR APIs. They are too restrictive on what the SparkR libraries
> allows (no custom Java methods) and the R backend is package protected.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jir
Instead of calling println(...), you can invoke kernel.stream.sendAll(...)
to send your data without breaking it up into chunks. Give that a shot and
see if you get all of your data via onStream.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM Harmeet Singh
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using spark-kernel to write
Are you talking about the SF Data Science meetup where Asim Jalis gave a
talk?
http://www.meetup.com/SF-Data-Science/events/228958752/
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:34 AM Gino Bustelo wrote:
> @Corey What was the name of that event that was using Toree?
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Gino Buste
Specifically, the talk was called, "Apache Toree: How To Develop
Spark/Scala Apps as Interactive Notebooks"
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:38 AM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Are you talking about the SF Data Science meetup where Asim Jalis gave a
> talk?
>
> http://www.meetup.com/
To get involved with the project, all you need to do is pick up a JIRA.
Here's the list of open JIRAs for 0.1.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-299?jql=project%20%3D%20TOREE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.1.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Here's a
Sure.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:46 AM Luciano Resende
wrote:
> Can we move this discussion to public ?
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> Was starting to read through this link:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#be
+1
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:47 PM Marius van Niekerk <
marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 at 16:22 Gino Bustelo wrote:
>
> > Tagged as v0.1.0-rc2 and points to the commit. I was trying to avoid
> overly
> > tagging and reserving them for actual releases. Instead...
While it isn't supported (we don't test its use in this case), you can
store objects in a shared hashmap under the kernel object that is made
available in each interpreter. The map is exposed as `kernel.data`, but the
way you access and store data is different per language.
The signature of the da
> Mobile: (313) 910-9272
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/2/16, 11:39 AM, "Chip Senkbeil" wrote:
>
> >While it isn't supported (we don't test its use in this case), you can
> >store objects in a shared hashmap under the kernel object t
+1.
- Manually installed using the pip package; verified that the install
worked and the Scala option was available in the notebook.
- Ran Scala code on the notebook.
- Ran some simple parallelization, reduces, etc. using a local Spark
cluster.
- Verified that PySpark interpreter worked correctly
7;,
> '__new__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', '__setattr__',
> '__sizeof__', '__str__', '__subclasshook__', '__weakref__', '_get_args',
> 'command_header', 'contain
So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things to
address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been open for
awhile.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo wrote:
> +1
>
> We need to get this thing moving.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah wrote
, check the archives there for an example of the vote thread, as
> you
> > need to add link to vote thread, cote result
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil
> > wrote:
> >
> >> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still
Moved to dev.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:23 PM Hitesh Shah wrote:
> Lets move this conversation to dev@.
>
> thanks
> -- Hitesh
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> Both Gino and I have gotten forbidden errors when trying to publish Toree
>
maven I just configure the
> settings.xml with credentials and it works... see some details on
> http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > Moved to dev.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:23 P
> Are the jars being signed with your gpg key? For releases, unsigned jars
> are not allowed so that might be something to check too.
>
> -- Hitesh
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > I've got my credentials configured, alth
igned) java.io.IOException: Access to URL
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/toree/kernel/toree-sql-interpreter_2.10/0.1.0-incubating/toree-sql-interpreter_2.10-0.1.0-incubating-sources.jar
was refused by the server: Forbidden
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:27 AM Chip Sen
n Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:52 AM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Yep, verified that the signatures are generated each jar, its sources jar,
> its pom, and its javadoc jar. All credentials are in place, gpg passphrase
> is being used correctly to sign the jars, and I'm still getting forbidden
&
ugh). You may wish to talk to the Infra
> folks via the hipchat channel and/or file an infra ticket to get guidance
> for both the questions.
>
> -- Hitesh
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > Should we have
> > https://rep
with
the release.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:26 AM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Already created an issue -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13061 - so, hopefully I'll
> hear back soon. ;)
>
> Also, asked on the PredictionIO dev mailing list since it's a fairly
>
If you want REST functionality, using something like Cloudera's Livy might
be more useful: https://github.com/cloudera/livy
Apache Toree is geared more towards dynamic applications that have a need
to run a variety of jobs against Spark that are configured on the fly such
as custom filtering and t
It's showing your PYTHONPATH as
/disk3/local/filecache/103/spark-assembly.jar. Toree is looking for pyspark
on your PYTHONPATH.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/blob/master/pyspark-interpreter/src/main/scala/org/apache/toree/kernel/interpreter/pyspark/PySparkProcess.scala#L78
That code i
This is long overdue, but since the artifacts weren't in staging at the
time of the vote for RC3, should we have another release vote?
Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this,
> but
> > if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to
> > continue,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Does Gino need to be the one to
I just published 0.1.0 artifacts to staging in preparation for an RC4 vote.
I cannot tell where they have gone to include a link in the description.
The root of the staging deployment is here:
https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/org/apache/toree/
And I see successful
repo for toree. You need to select it and hit "Close" I believe to
> publish to staging. On close, it will provide a maven repo url that someone
> else can use as a repo url for trying it out. After the final vote, the
> repo will need to be "released"
>
> thanks
>
Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and NOTICE files
since this is our first release.
## Information and Artifacts
The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc4
(1d526954ecaba1d5dc0f40ec555dd598b2b11df7), located
ve it a +1.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:15 PM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and NOTICE files
> since this is our first release.
>
> ## Information and Artifac
For some reason, I'm missing the first half of this thread. I only have
Paco Nathan's email. I don't have one from Eszti and I don't see one in our
mailing archive, either. Can someone repost his part?
As for the runtime errors in Docker, we'd be happy to accept any and all
contributions back into
Voting is now closed. This vote has PASSED with 5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1
votes. This vote will now go to the IPMC list for a second 72-hour vote.
Toree developers are encouraged to comment on the IPMC
vote as well.
+1:
Chip Senkbeil
Luciano Resende
Marius van Niekerk
Gino Bustelo
Corey Stubbs
0
The IPMC vote thread is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f891ecb9452b6b34b27e0f2879efb570e3768f8d09943a57bdd6e9d8@
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:26 PM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Voting is now closed. This vote has PASSED with 5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1
> votes. This vote will now go
No votes as of yet and it closes later today. Should some of us comment on
the thread to get activity again?
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:45 PM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> The IPMC vote thread is here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f891ecb9452b6b34b27e0f2879efb570e3768f8d09943a57bd
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > No votes as of yet and it closes later today. Should some of us comment
> on
> > the thread to get activity again?
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:45 PM Chip Senkbeil
> > wrot
Do I need to add a reply closing the existing vote on general@incubator if
we are preparing a new release? Marius and I have been addressing the
issues they've mentioned on general@incubator in preparation for a new vote
here followed by another vote on incubator. Just not sure if I need to do
anyt
Sorry, had a deadline at work today. I need to clear up a couple of things
before I cut new artefacts for a vote.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017, 10:14 AM Marius van Niekerk
wrote:
> I think we've cleared out the required static jar pieces. Should we call a
> vote again?
>
> -Marius
> --
> regards
> Mariu
Looks like the report is due today. Marius, are you available to take care
of it this month? I don't have time today.
Guess we missed this one since it was due yesterday. Considering they
really didn't like when we edited after the deadline earlier, we should
just be listed as missing the report.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017, 11:12 PM Marius van Niekerk
wrote:
> Pretty sure the following is correct, my wiki account is b
Thanks :)
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:56 AM Luciano Resende wrote:
> I have uploaded the report to the wiki and signed off as a mentor, and will
> take the blame if anyone complains about it :)
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > Guess we miss
Just built master, got all of the artifacts ready, blah blah blah. Tested
by installing the artifact from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc5/toree-pip/ and
now it's failing with not being able to bind to an ephemeral port for the
sparkDriver. Can someone help me take a
By master, I mean the 0.1.x branch. Was trying to get the next vote started.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017, 4:44 PM Chip Senkbeil wrote:
> Just built master, got all of the artifacts ready, blah blah blah. Tested
> by installing the artifact from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incuba
lnames<-, endsWith, intersect, rank, rbind, sample,
>
> startsWith, subset, summary, table, transform
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:03 AM Corey Stubbs wrote:
>
> > I was able to run from the pip package just fine.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:50 P
did wrong when backporting the spark
> 2.0 R things
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 at 10:18 Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > Turns out I needed to set my hostname on my machine to localhost. Doing
> so
> > fixed that error.
> >
> > As for the SparkR error, I'll t
Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and NOTICE files
since this is our first release.
## Information and Artifacts
The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc6
(51fa49cb5898e0c5b7824f986382436b969cabc7), located
e no longer has the extra license info tacked onto the
LICENSE file. I've also fixed the source release such that it is no longer
dependent on being in a Git repository to be built nor does it require you
to have sbt installed.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:09 AM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Ple
I'll take a look at them soon and give you some feedback. Was preparing the
next vote for the 0.1.0 release, which is why I've been a bit distracted.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:05 PM Ryan Blue
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been putting together a proof-of-concept Toree deployment for our
> Spar
The 0.2.x branch (currently master) is for Scala 2.11 and Spark 2.x.
The 0.1.x branch is for Scala 2.10 and Spark 1.x.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:41 PM Jakob Odersky wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> during a recent discussion with Marius
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/pull/93, I found out
sted with getting rid of some of the
> bundled
> > > pieces that were blocking for RC5.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017, 12:14 Chip Senkbeil
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll go ahead and give a +1 since I've done a bit of testing using
> &g
Voting is now closed. This vote has PASSED with 4 +1 votes and no 0 or -1
votes. This vote will now go to the IPMC list for a second 72-hour minimum
vote. Toree developers are encouraged to comment on the IPMC vote as well.
+1:
Chip Senkbeil
Marius van Niekerk
Gino Bustelo
Corey Stubbs
0:
-1:
Vote thread on the incubator @general channel can be found here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ecb5e40078f01c488ada52e776d57cd80e130164c1e31d8ded564ba2@
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:05 PM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Voting is now closed. This vote has PASSED with 4 +1 votes and no 0 or
It's nearly been three days since the thread has been opened. I've seen
other vote threads made after ours get some votes; so, I'm a little
concerned that our thread has become a bit stale.
Any mentor available to take a look at the thread and - if it looks good -
provide a +1 to get the spotlight
Thanks, appreciate it!
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, 6:41 AM Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > It's nearly been three days since the thread has been opened. I've seen
> > other vote threads made after ours g
We don't have access to the GitHub merge PR button, do we? That I'm aware
of, Gino, Corey, and I have been manually merging fully-rebased PRs to keep
a clean commit history.
If the GitHub merge PR button was available, we could use the
squash-and-rebase option, which provides a very clean way to b
It's been over two weeks since the vote started. We only have Luciano's
vote. Is there anything we can do at this point?
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:07 AM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Thanks, appreciate it!
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, 6:41 AM Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> On Fri
Given that we have only 1 vote (+1) in three weeks, should I go ahead and
publish the release? I know Luciano was asking about that on @general
incubator. Just want to get confirmation from mentors before doing so.
y trying to provoque others to
> review/vote.
>
> How about you send direct email to each mentor requesting their vote ?
>
> Also, it might be time to receuit more active mentors.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:40 PM Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
> > Given that we ha
That's great news! Thanks for getting that set up! I'll take a look on
Monday to see how ghee integration works.
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017, 3:59 PM Luciano Resende wrote:
> I have worked with infra team to enhance the issue workflow for Toree. We
> now have enabled Github integration that will update
I've emailed all of our mentors and it's been a week with no response.
Luciano, how do we go about getting additional, active mentors? We're being
blocked on the release front purely from lack of votes.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:04 PM Chip Senkbeil
wrote:
> Hitesh was our
Hurray! Glad to hear from you again, Hitesh!
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:01 PM Hitesh Shah wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Apologies for the delay in this. I will take a look at the release later
> today and comment on the vote.
>
> -- Hitesh
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:40 AM
When refactoring our original interpreter codebase to support new languages
such as Python and R, I wrote the broker service to abstract the process of
communicating with another language's interpreter. When SQL was added, it
was easier to add a stubbed-out broker service such that the interpreter
The branch
https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree-website/tree/OverhaulSite was
meant to replace the current master and is closer to the current website
than the master branch.
I know that Gino/Corey were working on content that was based on the
branch, but they may have lost it.
On Fri, Mar 3
I've gotten mixed messages regarding where the pip artifacts should go.
Originally, we were going to publish them on
https://pypi.python.org/pypi (which
we were previously doing for dev snapshots), but there has been some issues
with hosting externally from Apache? Is that still the case? Can we ho
What is the exact name that you want for the release?
Previously, we were using just "toree", but do you want "apache-toree" or
"apache-toree-incubating"?
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:47 AM Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Chip Senkbeil
t;
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
>> What is the exact name that you want for the release?
>>
>> Previously, we were using just "toree", but do you want "apache-toree" or
>> "apache-toree-incubating"?
>&
docs and other stuff, right ?
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
>> It looks like all of our makefile work was updated awhile ago to use
>> apache-toree. This must have been from an earlier conversation. I can
>> update our release art
Go for it.
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017, 3:08 PM Luciano Resende wrote:
> The current master only works with Apache Spark 2.x which is based on Scala
> 2.11 and moving towards Scala 2.12.
>
> Anyone opposed on removing Scala 2.10 from master ?
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>
At one point, we were going to make Toree highly pluggable using our
then-new plugin framework. Things like an interpreter and a spark context
would be initialized via plugins and anything needing them would be plugins
dependent on those objects. The scala interpreter wasn't necessary for the
spark
I just ran through the usual basic stuff and it looked fine. +1
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:03 AM Luciano Resende
wrote:
> Off course, my +1
>
> Any others?
>
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Luciano Resende
> wrote:
>
> > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating
> >
Who has ownership rights? Corey and Go no? I don't think I have them, but
I'll check later today.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018, 11:23 PM Luciano Resende wrote:
> The RC6 has been approved by the IPMC and I have started the process of
> publishing the release which usually takes a day or so for replicati
Oh, I think I do have access to PyPi. Luciano, what email address do you
want associated? Your gmail one? Your apache one?
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:21 AM Ryan Blue
wrote:
> Great news! Thank you for making this happen, Luciano.
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:29 AM Chip Senkbeil
ug 14, 2018 at 08:54 Chip Senkbeil
> wrote:
>
>> Oh, I think I do have access to PyPi. Luciano, what email address do you
>> want associated? Your gmail one? Your apache one?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:21 AM Ryan Blue
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Great
They served as experiments in a time where the functionality may have been
useful, but that time has long since passed.
+1
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 9:19 PM Gino Bustelo wrote:
> +1
>
> Spark’s support to share temp tables across sessions voids any need for
> this multi-Lang support.
>
> Gino B.
>
This was an old implementation geared towards allowing us to manage all
launched threads so we could interrupt/kill them on request.
I'm not sure how useful this feature has been to folks, so my thought is that
we either remove it entirely or make it a feature that can be enabled/disabled
throu
We only ever exposed the thread killing functionality through capturing the
interrupt signal on the kernel process. This was to support the stop button
in Jupyter notebooks.
I can't remember if that code still exists as it was a bit flakey, relying
on a Sun API to capture the signal and respond.
+1, LGTM. Did we want to update the release notes with the changes? I
was using
https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/compare/v0.3.0-incubating...v0.4.0-incubating-rc1
to get a summary of what has changed since 0.3.0's release.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:26 PM Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> Pleas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Senkbeil updated TOREE-257:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Code submit does not support paste m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOREE-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15139056#comment-15139056
]
Chip Senkbeil commented on TOREE-257:
-
Hm, I wonder what the better option woul
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
