Hi Luciano
Good to hear you thinking along these lines. Taking the scenario motivated
approach will help improve policy support generally I think. I've put
comments that come immediately to mind in line.
Once you think we have a good handle on the initial scenarios we could start
making some ites
Back in September last year the parts of the sca-binding-webservice.xsd
schema marked below with chevrons were removed. We don't support
wsdlLocation at the moment so I can see why that would be the case but we do
still process EndpointReference elements. Were these elements removed for
technical r
Annotations are not processed for implementation.osgi
-
Key: TUSCANY-2605
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2605
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java
Thanks All, I have opened a JIRA TUSCANY-2606 for the same.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ramkumar R wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> Tuscany currently uses Axis2 1.3.
>>
>> How about migrating to Axis2 1.4.1 to take advantage of the latest
>> change
Upgrade Axis2 version from 1.3 to 1.4.1
---
Key: TUSCANY-2606
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2606
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Axis Binding Extension
@Ignores in vtest/wsbinding/nowsdl/soapversion related to WSDL generation
-
Key: TUSCANY-2607
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2607
Project: Tuscany
Is
@Ignores relating to secutiry subject in
vtest/java-api/annotations/conversationattributes and
vtest/java-api/apis/requestcontext
-
Key: TUSCANY-2608
@Ignore in vtest/java-api/apis/componentcontext need better test for dynamic
reference retrieval
Key: TUSCANY-2609
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Stucky updated TUSCANY-2281:
---
Attachment: ComponentContextImpl.java
ComponentContext.java
Hi Simon,
atta
I don't think we need PMC involvement we could just go ahead and start if
anyone has any concerns they're free to voice them or if them want to help
even better. One thing, we did discuss some sort of prize/lottery to
motivate participation but thats probably not an option given this post over
on l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2281:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
> How to create ServiceReferences for references using multiplicity="1
Hi,
I started to build a table at [1] to describe the list of tuscany modules.
The purpose is to capture the following information:
1. Describe the function provided by a tuscany module
2. Group tuscany modules by functional areas
3. Show dependencies between categories
4. Map the SCA programm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12631945#action_12631945
]
Anurodh commented on TUSCANY-2604:
--
I tried using "\" character before "." now getting f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12631945#action_12631945
]
dubeyanurodh edited comment on TUSCANY-2604 at 9/17/08 1:58 PM:
---
Hi,
I tried running the full build with security on.
Initially, I granted AllPermission to the code base.
Following is my tuscany.policy file:
grant codeBase "file:/home/dchauhan/Documents/Tuscany/java_09122008/sca/-" {
permission java.security.AllPermission;
};
grant codeBase "file:/home/
Thank you both for the information that you provided. I'll move the table
that Raymond has into the wiki page as a starting point. Let's work from one
place.
Daniel, you raised a good point that I was not covering on the wiki page and
that is the mapping to bundles. I am assuming that there is a 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632030#action_12632030
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2604:
---
It seems that 9082 is not the correct port
Hey guys,
Do we have any thoughts on when RC{0,1} for 1.3.2 will be taken? It'd
be quite useful to get this soon.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have also merged TUSCANY-2463 and TUSCANY-2538 from trun
Yay, never gotten around to it but always thought we should support this.
...ant
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:33 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: rfeng
> Date: Wed Sep 17 18:33:03 2008
> New Revision: 696531
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696531&view=rev
> Log:
> Support the r
19 matches
Mail list logo