Re: [BRAINSTORM] Future improvements for Tuscany databinding framework - MIME/binary support

2008-10-28 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Very useful ideas. I agreed with the notion of content transfer encoding as > well. Thanks. (short guide to MIME typing) there are 6 base MIME headers (see RFC 2045) MIME-Version (in practice always 1.0) Content-Type (media

A question from the Tuscany SCA Chinese ForumI: Is SCA container always required to deploy SCA composite applications?

2008-10-28 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, A user raised an interesting question in the Tuscany SCA Chinese Forum [1]. I think it would be useful to share it in English on this mailing list. The question is: To deploy an SCA assembly in a distributed environment, is a SCA container (such as Tuscany) required for each of the runti

Re: Getting anonymous user feedback on Tuscany

2008-10-28 Thread haleh mahbod
Does silence mean this is good enough to be put into a survey? I'd like to suggest to add one more question. 8. How is your choice of SCA helping your business? On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:30 PM, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ant, > > Thank you for taking the first step to put th

question on @Callback reference from forward interface

2008-10-28 Thread Scott Kurz
I noticed an annoyance in the scenario that we are developing in a top-down style, starting with two WSDL interfaces, which we wish to use as a forward/callback pair. Since this is top-down, we generate Java interfaces from each WSDL using something like wsimport. The annoyance is that I have to

Re: [BRAINSTORM] Future improvements for Tuscany databinding framework - MIME/binary support

2008-10-28 Thread Dan Becker
Very useful ideas. I agreed with the notion of content transfer encoding as well. Thanks. Raymond, can you suggest where to place the annotation in the example? A property on the interface specification in the composite? >>> Raymond Feng wrote: Good point. It would be helpful to sup