Re: Added page on importing projects into Eclipse

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Florian MOGA moga@gmail.com wrote: There is also the possibility of using the Maven plugin for Eclipse. Where can I find the corresponding wiki page in order to add this? On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: svn commit: r993560 - /tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/

2010-09-15 Thread ant elder
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: ant elder wrote: On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:52 AM,  jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: Author: jsdelfino Date: Tue Sep  7 23:52:54 2010 New Revision: 993560 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993560view=rev

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Tuscany-2x #839

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Apache Hudson Server hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote: See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/839/changes Changes: [antelder] Update jms binding to callback interceptor to support jms: uri format callback q property values [slaws] TUSCANY-3631 -

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3631) Itest WS authentication-basic fails

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3631. - Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Resolution: Fixed Another fix applied at r996966 Itest WS

Re: Added page on importing projects into Eclipse

2010-09-15 Thread Florian MOGA
I'd be happy to do it. Also, I could explain how I'm using the Maven plugin for Eclipse and it's integration with WTP in case we have a section Deploying Tuscany or Running Tuscany which I'm missing or could be another section of the Development Guide. I'm a bit caught up these days with

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3678) Tuscany SCA source distribution contents don't match binary distribution

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12909657#action_12909657 ] Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-3678: - I haven't made any changes to the list of

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3664) Add holder support to 2.x

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12909662#action_12909662 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3664: - There is now an otest that relies on this

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-3664) Add holder support to 2.x

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3664: Component/s: OASIS Compliance - TUSCANY Add to the OASIS Compliance - Tuscany component Add

2.x/compliance failures

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws
I'm seeing lots of errors when trunk/compliance runs at the moment. However the only error I see when I run otest/newlayout is the JCA_11021 failure related to lack of holder support in the runtime (TUSCANY-3664). Firstly, I assume others see failures in trunk/compliance. If so can we now upgrade

Re: 2.x/compliance failures

2010-09-15 Thread ant elder
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm seeing lots of errors when trunk/compliance runs at the moment. However the only error I see when I run otest/newlayout is the JCA_11021 failure related to lack of holder support in the runtime (TUSCANY-3664).

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3674) Review/consolidate 2.x distribution structure

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:58 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote: What really matters here is the mechanism. The feature poms we

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3674) Review/consolidate 2.x distribution structure

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws
The shaded base includes more than the feature core mainly because it works and is used differently. When a uses uses the base jar they get that one jar and nothing else so it doesn't really matter if extra things are included in base as long as they don't drag in extra transitive

Re: 2.x/compliance failures

2010-09-15 Thread ant elder
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm seeing lots of errors when trunk/compliance runs at the

Re: 2.x/compliance failures

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:26 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3674) Review/consolidate 2.x distribution structure

2010-09-15 Thread ant elder
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: The shaded base includes more than the feature core mainly because it works and is used differently. When a uses uses the base jar they get that one jar and nothing else so it doesn't really matter if extra things

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3674) Review/consolidate 2.x distribution structure

2010-09-15 Thread ant elder
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:58 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Raymond Feng

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3674) Review/consolidate 2.x distribution structure

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:44 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:58 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com

Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3674) Review/consolidate 2.x distribution structure

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:44 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:58 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com

Re: [NOTICE] Florian Moga voted as a Tuscany Committer

2010-09-15 Thread Mike Edwards
Florian MOGA wrote: Thanks! Glad to be part of the Tuscany community :) On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:37 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com mailto:ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: The

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Tuscany-2x #839

2010-09-15 Thread Luciano Resende
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote: At the bottom, I see too many open files. It seems that the build is running out of file handles. Raymond Feng Sent from my iPhone So do I

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Tuscany-2x #839

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote: At the bottom, I see too many open files. It seems that the build is

Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5

2010-09-15 Thread ant elder
OK nice work, if you raise a jira [1] and attach the workspace as a zip we can look at getting it committed into a branch and even out in a release. If multiple people have worked on it their names need to be made clear in the jira, if there are significantly large code changes we may need to get

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3679) EMF 2.5 Upgrade for Tuscany SDO

2010-09-15 Thread Florian Pinel (JIRA)
EMF 2.5 Upgrade for Tuscany SDO --- Key: TUSCANY-3679 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3679 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: New Feature Components: Java SDO Implementation Affects

Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5

2010-09-15 Thread Florian Pinel
Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3679 -- Florian Pinel IBM T.J. Watson Research Center Tie line: 863-7346 Ext. phone: 914-784-7346 ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com 09/15/2010 04:04 PM Please respond to dev@tuscany.apache.org To dev@tuscany.apache.org cc Subject Re:

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-3679) EMF 2.5 Upgrade for Tuscany SDO

2010-09-15 Thread Florian Pinel (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Florian Pinel updated TUSCANY-3679: --- Attachment: tuscany-sdo-impl.zip tuscany-sdo-impl eclipse project EMF 2.5 Upgrade for