Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2

2011-01-31 Thread Mike Edwards
On 30/01/2011 10:08, ant elder wrote: Please review and vote on RC2 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release. The artifacts are at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC2/ The release tag is at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta2-RC2 Here's my +1

Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-01-31 Thread Scott Kurz
Gang, I don't know the answer but I'm curious myself how the Axis2 dispatcher works in this case. What are you expecting the SOAPAction header to be set to? Are you referencing an existing WSDL defining SOAPAction on each of the reference/service sides or are you having the Tuscany WS binding g

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2

2011-01-31 Thread Florian MOGA
I'm experiencing the following problem while running the build from the root directory: in the test phase of iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE at the sample-binding-rmi-calculator-contribution ant target, the process hangs... If I Ctrl+C it, I get a weird "Java returned 130" error at line 95

An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-01-31 Thread Yang, Gang CTR US USA
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Hi, I'm continuing the effort to provide a WS-Security using the PolicyHandler extension framework in 1.6.1. I've successfully added the capabilities to attach security tokens and to sign message body/headers after I've modified the PolicyHandler f

Re: Reduce default logging output in 2.x

2011-01-31 Thread Simon Laws
>> > > Ok let me go do that. While doing that i'd also quite like to update > the message output by the endpoint registry addEndpoint to include the > binding type and binding URI and to not include the Endpoint hashcode, > say if anyone has concerns or updates on that. > >   ...ant > Fine by me.

Re: Reduce default logging output in 2.x

2011-01-31 Thread ant elder
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Simon Laws wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Simon Nash wrote: >> ant elder wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Simon Nash wrote: Simon Laws wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:03 PM, ant elder wrote: >> >> On Th

Re: Reduce default logging output in 2.x

2011-01-31 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Simon Nash wrote: > ant elder wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Simon Nash wrote: >>> >>> Simon Laws wrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:03 PM, ant elder wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Simon Laws > wrote: >> >>>

Re: Databinding mediation between part-based and doc-wrapped operations

2011-01-31 Thread Scott Kurz
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: > First, I agree that we could use a better name for the first flag, for > example: > unwrapped or subjectToWrapping > true: the parameters are child elements of the wrapper (doc-lit-wrapper or > RPC wrapper) > false: the parameter is already a

Re: Reduce default logging output in 2.x

2011-01-31 Thread Simon Nash
ant elder wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Simon Nash wrote: Simon Laws wrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:03 PM, ant elder wrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Simon Laws wrote: I'd like to reduce the amount of log output we get by default by, for example, changing the endpoint

Re: Reduce default logging output in 2.x

2011-01-31 Thread ant elder
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Simon Nash wrote: > Simon Laws wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:03 PM, ant elder wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Simon Laws >>> wrote: I'd like to reduce the amount of log output we get by default by, for example, changing t