On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Brent Daniel wrote:
> I noticed that the appliesTo processing in PolicyAppliesToBuilderImpl
> is not operating on components. Otherwise it seems to be working fine
> from what I can tell. This is something to take into consideration if
> the implementation policies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3873.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Change committed at revision 1136386 to copy policy from the service to the
ref
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Brent Daniel wrote:
>> I noticed that the appliesTo processing in PolicyAppliesToBuilderImpl
>> is not operating on components. Otherwise it seems to be working fine
>> from what I can tell. This is something to
Simon,
I've been operating with basically the same set of changes locally and
things do seem to work fine.
>From a design perspective, the unshared model seems like a better
alternative to me. I'm sure there are performance gains from not
having to do annotation processing, etc, multiple times, b
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Brent Daniel wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I've been operating with basically the same set of changes locally and
> things do seem to work fine.
>
> From a design perspective, the unshared model seems like a better
> alternative to me. I'm sure there are performance gains fr
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Brent Daniel wrote:
>> Simon,
>>
>> I've been operating with basically the same set of changes locally and
>> things do seem to work fine.
>>
>> From a design perspective, the unshared model seems like a better
Still need one more vote to be able to release this please.
...ant
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Florian Moga wrote:
> No, that's not an issue. I was checking with you in case the plugin had to
> detect the webapp and construct the zip file in a different way so that the
> Node will know t
