On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Brent Daniel <brenthdan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Simon, >> >> I've been operating with basically the same set of changes locally and >> things do seem to work fine. >> >> From a design perspective, the unshared model seems like a better >> alternative to me. I'm sure there are performance gains from not >> having to do annotation processing, etc, multiple times, but these >> could probably be achieved with caching elsewhere. >> >> Brent >> > > Ok, Brent. Lets go with it for the time being and see how hangs > together. If you have improvements in your changes over what I added > feel free to go in and fix it up. > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
And I forgot to add that I'm still seeing some residual issues in the way that appliesTo is processed. I think because the applies to processing is based on reference and services where it should really be based on endpints and endpoint references. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
