Re: NOTICE file cleanup

On May 21, 2010, at 2:19 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > >>> Eg take the thing that comes next in the current file which is a >>> section about jsonrpc.js - there's no need for that as the copyright >>> is in the actual source file still and i

Re: Will there be an OpenEJB 3.0.2 release?

On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:30 AM, David Blevins wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> We would like to release our Tuscany Java SCA 1.6 extensions that use >> OpenEJB, but these issues [1][2] are preventing us to do so. >> Are there still plans to have a OpenEJB 3.0.2

Re: otest permgen failures

On Jul 30, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Simon Laws wrote: Thanks Kevan That's very useful. It's seems we need to at least look a little more closely at the EndpointRegsitry which, in it's default guise that we use for testing, has static collections of Endpoints and EndpointReferences. In theory everyth

otest permgen failures

I gathered some data on the otest PermGen problems, last night. Would take a fair amount of digging around for me to make any progress. So, thought I'd drop a note to the list to see what ideas others have... I used the java arg '-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError' to generate a heapdump, when

Re: running the otests

On Jul 28, 2009, at 11:05 AM, ant elder wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jul 28, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Simon Laws wrote: Hi Kevan On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Simon Laws wrote: snip.. Running otests

Re: running the otests

On Jul 28, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Simon Laws wrote: Hi Kevan On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Simon Laws wrote: snip.. Running otests, I see a fair number of errors like the following: ...snip I see different environment related errors for

Re: running the otests

On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Simon Laws wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Simon Laws wrote: OK, I've been looking at the perm gen this afternoon. Not getting very far with it:-( Simon I've checked in the fixes I made in 1.x in the hope that it will help (shouldn't do any harm). Th

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-3183) Clean up samples dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated TUSCANY-3183: -- Attachment: TUSCANY-3183.patch This patch helps me... Don't have a completely clean

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3183) Clean up samples dependencies

Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0 I'm getting some dependency errors building tuscan/java/sca. Seem to be caused by the recent restructure in samples. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment t

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M3 RC1

On Jun 18, 2009, at 8:50 AM, ant elder wrote: Please review and vote on RC1 of the SCA 2.0 M3 release. The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-M3-RC1/ The release tag is at: http://svn.ap

Re: [DISCUSS] Contribution classloaders when SCA contribution contains Java EE artifacts

On Apr 16, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Simon Laws wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Apr 15, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Simon Laws wrote: Re. the back slash problem I see you raised http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1005 so is it safe to assume you're running

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2935) Integration tests for Java EE contribution processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated TUSCANY-2935: -- Attachment: get-openejb-fix.patch I've fixed the backslash issue in OpenEJB. And manag

Re: [DISCUSS] Contribution classloaders when SCA contribution contains Java EE artifacts

On Apr 15, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Simon Laws wrote: Re. the back slash problem I see you raised http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1005 so is it safe to assume you're running with local fixes? I've fixed this in OpenEJB 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT and 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT. I haven't been able to deploy t

Re: [1.x] Where is source for JEE test/sample ears, jars and wars?

On Apr 15, 2009, at 5:59 AM, Simon Laws wrote: Looking at, for example, itest/contribution-jee/src/test/resources you see files such as simple-app.ear. Anyone know where the source for these applications is? Heh. Good question. I think you can assume that the source comes from here -- https

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2935) Integration tests for Java EE contribution processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated TUSCANY-2935: -- Attachment: jee-tests.patch Vamsi, I enabled the tests that you had committed. There were a

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2953) Fix sca.tld in branches-1.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated TUSCANY-2953: -- Attachment: sca.patch Note that modules/host-webapp/src/main/resources/META-INF/sca.tld

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2953) Fix sca.tld in branches-1.x

Fix sca.tld in branches-1.x --- Key: TUSCANY-2953 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2953 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Kevan Miller I'm not sure I understan

Re: [1.x] build problems

On Mar 27, 2009, at 6:45 AM, ant elder wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Simon Laws wrote: At a high level I'm seeing the attached problems on a full build. Anyone else seeing these? Anyone else working on them? I'm looking at the JMS ones at the moment but the others could do with som

Re: Unable to set up Tuscany in IDE......

On Mar 18, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Pradeep Fernando wrote: Hi devs, I'm trying to set up Tuscany in IDE. i checkedout the source and tried to build the source according to directions given on document[1]. I tried all the given methods, but could not build the source. The error i got from running the

Re: Tuscany Continuun build status

On Mar 19, 2009, at 11:41 AM, ant elder wrote: It doesnt happen for me, only on the continuum machine on the last build so i guess it will happen if a continuum build is forced, that can take hours to get to happen though, i've managed to get just one build run so far today. When I ran into t

Re: svn commit: r751885 - /tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/

On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Interesting. Is there a particular reason why old release candidates are maintained in svn? Why not delete the RC's? E.g. 2.0-M1-RC1, RC2, and RC3? I find them confusing,

Re: svn commit: r751885 - /tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/

On Mar 9, 2009, at 6:39 PM, lrese...@apache.org wrote: Author: lresende Date: Mon Mar 9 22:39:04 2009 New Revision: 751885 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=751885&view=rev Log: 2.0-M1 Final Release Tag Added: tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/ (props changed) - copied from r751884,

Re: It's that time again...

On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Glen Daniels wrote: Hi y'all: Time for our quarterly board report. Please update http://wiki.apache.org/ws/ReportForMar2009 by the weekend if there's anything to report in your subprojects. I need to submit the report by Monday. Hiya Glen, FYI, looks like

mailing list netiquette

I follow a fair number of mailing lists. For some reason, I seem to have a particularly hard time reading the Tuscany dev mailing list. One reason for this is the volume of posts -- there is a lot of activity. However, I also find that posts to the dev list can be difficult to read. With

Re: build failure in sca/java

On Mar 9, 2009, at 6:41 AM, Simon Laws wrote: Ok, past most of it now. A bit of judicious mvn cleaning and it sorted itself out. Am left with... [INFO] [INFO] Error for project: Apache Tuscany SCA Distribution itest

Re: [1.x] Errors compiling Tuscany Geronimo plugin

On Mar 8, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: This is one of the side effects of not having all the code in one place. Please add the new method to servletHost in the geronimo plugin, possibly just delegating to the existing one and passing SecurityContext as null. I fixed the compile er

Re: build failure in sca/java

On Mar 6, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, A few folks hit this issue. In our maven-bundle-plugin 1.0.0, the osgi jar that contains org.osgi.framework.Version class is a transitive dependency. For some reason, it's not added to the plugin classpath. I don't see that issue in my

build failure in sca/java

Anybody else seeing this failure in sca/java? [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache Tuscany SCA All-in-one Distribution [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install] [INFO] ---

Re: [2.x] Survey: What is the minimum JDK version that the OASIS SCA-J Specifications should support JDK 1.5 or JDK 1.6?

On Feb 18, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Mark Combellack wrote: Hi, On one of the recent OASIS SCA-J calls, there were discussions on the minimum JDK version that the OASIS SCA-J Specification should require. Currently the specification has an unclear statement as to whether the minimum is JDK 1.4

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, 1) I fixed the SAX2DOM ASL header. Thanks 2) I'm using JDK 6 on both Windows and Linux and I don't see any problems. OK. Good to know. 3) For the tools.jar issue, Kevan had a patch for http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-25

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: I noted that Kevan was +0, Are we going to need a new RC ? Not in my opinion. If I thought one was needed, I'd have voted -1... ;-) I think it's best to get the release out and keep moving. I'll see if I can figure out what's going on w

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:44 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: Please review and vote on the 2.0-M1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M1-RC3/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, th

Re: svn commit: r743809 - /tuscany/java/sca/modules/implementation-node/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.CompositeBuilder

On Feb 12, 2009, at 8:55 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: Done. Thanks for pointing it out. Not sure why the "http://"; became "http:.." in the first place. NP. Was kind of strange. 'svn blame' says who, but not why... ;-) --kevan

Re: svn commit: r743809 - /tuscany/java/sca/modules/implementation-node/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.CompositeBuilder

On Feb 12, 2009, at 11:58 AM, rf...@apache.org wrote: Author: rfeng Date: Thu Feb 12 16:58:42 2009 New Revision: 743809 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=743809&view=rev Log: Fix the license header Modified: tuscany/java/sca/modules/implementation-node/src/main/resources/ META-INF/ser

Re: Continuous Integration / Automated Builds

On Feb 3, 2009, at 10:05 AM, ant elder wrote: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: It seems to me that the Tuscany project would benefit from a continuous integration environment / automated build process. Simply identifying compile/dependency errors would be a big help

Continuous Integration / Automated Builds

It seems to me that the Tuscany project would benefit from a continuous integration environment / automated build process. Simply identifying compile/dependency errors would be a big help. The inclusion of higher-level integration tests in the build would, IMO, greatly enhance the benefit.

Re: svn commit: r739265 - /tuscany/java/sca/distribution/pom.xml

On Jan 30, 2009, at 8:00 AM, antel...@apache.org wrote: Author: antelder Date: Fri Jan 30 13:00:18 2009 New Revision: 739265 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=739265&view=rev Log: Move webservices out of the distribution build till the axis2 binding is going Modified: tuscany/java/s

Re: Setting JMSDeliveryMode and JMSPriority

On Jan 20, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Greg Dritschler wrote: I've noticed that JMSHeaderReferencePolicyInterceptor and TransportServiceInterceptor set the JMSDeliveryMode and JMSPriority headers in the request and response JMS messages respectively before the messages are sent. I am under the imp

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.4 (RC4)

Here's my +1 with some comments: 1) IMO, there should be a LICENSE and NOTICE file in the root of the svn tag. 2) A few documentation files would be useful (e.g. README, RELEASE_NOTES, BUILDING .txt files) --kevan On Jan 8, 2009, at 1:10 PM, ant elder wrote: The release artifacts for the

Congratulations Luciano

I wanted to let everyone know that Luciano Resende is a new Member of the Apache Software Foundation. At the the December ASF Members meeting, in recognition of his contributions to the ASF, the members voted to invite Luciano to become an ASF Member. IMO, this was well- deserved recognition

Re: Tuscany Geronimo integration and the SCA JEE spec

On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: I'm a bit worried that all the Tuscany/Geronimo integration discussions are carried on the Geronimo ML only. Would it be possible that we copy both Tuscany and Geronimo ML? In my experience, cross-posting can easily (usually?) ends up with

Re: J2SE6 default for 2.0?

On Nov 12, 2008, at 9:10 AM, ant elder wrote: Any opinions on having Java SE 6 be the default for the Tuscany 2.0 stream? A benefit of doing this is that a lot of the basic dependencies we use are included in Java SE 6 by default so we wouldn't need to include all those dependencies sepa

Re: Tuscany Geronimo integration and the SCA JEE spec

On Oct 6, 2008, at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Oct 3, 2008, at 5:57 AM, ant elder wrote: I'd like to start spending more time actively working on the Tuscany Geronimo integration and having that more support the SCA JEE specification (see: [1]). Here is a rough outline of wha

Re: Tuscany Geronimo integration and the SCA JEE spec

On Oct 3, 2008, at 5:57 AM, ant elder wrote: I'd like to start spending more time actively working on the Tuscany Geronimo integration and having that more support the SCA JEE specification (see: [1]). Here is a rough outline of what i'd like to do: The goal of this would be to use Geron

Re: OSOA API headers - was: Re: sca.tld license header

On Oct 1, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Mike Edwards wrote: Simon Laws wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Simon Laws wrote: Excellent Luciano. Well found. If they came from Tuscany in the first place, which t

Re: sca.tld license header

On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:55 AM, ant elder wrote: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I was under the impression that sca.tld [1] was comming from SCA specification. In this case, should it have the Apache License header on it ? [1] https://svn.apache

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2622) Fix geronimo runtime errors caused by inverse-classloading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated TUSCANY-2622: -- Attachment: TUSCANY-2622.patch This patch filters the classes needed to load Axis2 (and

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2622) Fix geronimo runtime errors caused by inverse-classloading

Reporter: Kevan Miller The use of causes runtime errors when the alert-aggregator-webapp demo is deployed on Geronimo. Better to be more specific on what classes need to be loaded from the web app archive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a

Tuscany IRC Channel

I noticed that there's a Tuscany IRC channel referenced on the Tuscany web site -- http://tuscany.apache.org/getting-involved.html. I joined it, but doesn't look like it's being used by the community. FYI, while I was there somebody else joined the channel and asked if this was a place to t

Re: Google license for JavaScript Client Library

On Sep 19, 2008, at 5:10 PM, Dan Becker wrote: Very intriguing idea. I definitely would like to solve this in the short term to help with the Tuscany JIRA (2568), but long term I see the appeal of this to a wider audience. Speaking as a relative newcomer -- seems like you should definitely

Re: Google license for JavaScript Client Library

On Sep 18, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Dan Becker wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: On Sep 18, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Dan Becker wrote: A question for the more legal-wise of the developers. I am investigating Tuscany-2568 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2568 ) which is to provide a Tuscany

Re: Google license for JavaScript Client Library

On Sep 18, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Dan Becker wrote: A question for the more legal-wise of the developers. I am investigating Tuscany-2568 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2568 ) which is to provide a Tuscany JavaScript client model for Atom data. Luciano and I have discussed the i

Re: Google license for JavaScript Client Library

On Sep 18, 2008, at 4:23 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: We should be asking license related issues in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also, FYI, see related discussion thread about GData Java apis [1] No harm in communities discussing licensing issues. Actually, it's better than that... I'd say it's a good t

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2595) Couldn't find a version in [1.0.0-v20070606] to match range [1.0.0,2.0.0) org.eclipse.equinox:app:jar:null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed TUSCANY-2595. - > Couldn't find a version in [1.0.0-v20070606] to match range [1.0

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2594) Failed to resolve artifact com.sun:tools:jar:1.5.0 in modules/interface-java-jaxws on Mac OS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed TUSCANY-2594. - > Failed to resolve artifact com.sun:tools:jar:1.5.0 in > modules/interface-java-jaxws on

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2595) Couldn't find a version in [1.0.0-v20070606] to match range [1.0.0,2.0.0) org.eclipse.equinox:app:jar:null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated TUSCANY-2595: -- Attachment: TUSCANY-2595-PART2.patch Ran into the same basic issue in java/sca/tools/eclipse

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2595) Couldn't find a version in [1.0.0-v20070606] to match range [1.0.0,2.0.0) org.eclipse.equinox:app:jar:null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated TUSCANY-2595: -- Attachment: TUSCANY-2595.patch OK. This is pretty much a hack. But is a better hack than

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2595) Couldn't find a version in [1.0.0-v20070606] to match range [1.0.0,2.0.0) org.eclipse.equinox:app:jar:null

e.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2595 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Build System Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.4 Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: Java-SCA-1.4 Simon Nash ran into this a month or so ago. I'm running into it no

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2594) Failed to resolve artifact com.sun:tools:jar:1.5.0 in modules/interface-java-jaxws on Mac OS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated TUSCANY-2594: -- Patch Info: [Patch Available] > Failed to resolve artifact com.sun:tools:jar:1.5.0

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2594) Failed to resolve artifact com.sun:tools:jar:1.5.0 in modules/interface-java-jaxws on Mac OS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated TUSCANY-2594: -- Attachment: TUSCANY-2594.patch modules/interface-java-jaxws/pom.xml contains the following

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2594) Failed to resolve artifact com.sun:tools:jar:1.5.0 in modules/interface-java-jaxws on Mac OS

Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Build System Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.4 Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: Java-SCA-1.4 Chris Tezzi reported the following problem a few months back. Since I ran into it, also, thought it

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2302) Exception thrown during SimpleTypeMapperExtensionTestCase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated TUSCANY-2302: -- Attachment: TUSCANY-2302.patch Fix Mac OS JUnit test failure. Extends existing work-around

Re: Problem deploying alert-aggregator demo app from Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1) on Geronimo 2.1.2

On Aug 25, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Hi Raymond, Thanks for your input. Adding tags inside tags, three of the errors were taken care. The first error was taken care by removing the version attribute from . Looks like sca.tld in host-webapp module needs to be fixed

Re: Problem deploying alert-aggregator demo app from Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1) on Geronimo 2.1.2

Given the content of your taglib plan, I'm a bit suspicious that this is a Geronimo problem... --kevan On Aug 22, 2008, at 9:15 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: I have built the demo-alert-aggregator war file as given in the instructions in Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1) distribution and tried to depl