Re: Cloud enabled devices.

2011-10-13 Thread dsh
[1] - That's what you are looking for in terms of CLang and pthread no? [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2391194/what-is-gs-pthread-equiv-in-clang Cheers Daniel On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Giorgio Zoppi giorgio.zo...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/10/13 Jean-Sebastien Delfino

Re: Cloud enabled devices.

2011-10-11 Thread dsh
Hi Giorgio, if you say WE, is that WE like in HP the enterprise? Cheers Daniel On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Giorgio Zoppi giorgio.zo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, first of all we have to target to a demo product as embedded. This is what I am looking for, for going to people...and saying

Re: Cloud enabled devices.

2011-10-10 Thread dsh
++, but generally performs bad in runtime/resource contrains enviroment but now the step is to see..a product. Any idea? 2011/10/9 dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com: Hi Giorgio Sounds interesting. I haven't looked at the Tuscany native runtime for a long time but I know Sebastien and Daniel have been

Re: Cloud enabled devices.

2011-10-09 Thread dsh
Btw, I would not completely disregard Java as a platform if you think it doesn't scale on resource constraint devices. For instance SheevaPlug devices [1] can be ordered with an accompanying J9 VM and a ProSyst OSGi R4 framework [2] and I suppose both scales pretty well on those devices. [1]

Re: Cloud enabled devices.

2011-10-08 Thread dsh
Hi, are you targeting for end user devices such as tablets, cell phones etc.? at network devices such as embedded routers, firewalls, a NAS etc. or are you thinking of something that's really agnostic and thus more pervasive and hence could be run on any of the use case scenarios mentioned?

Re: Cloud enabled devices.

2011-10-08 Thread dsh
...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/10/8 dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com: Hi, are you targeting for end user devices such as tablets, cell phones etc.? at network devices such as embedded routers, firewalls, a NAS etc. or are you thinking of something that's really agnostic and thus more pervasive and hence

Re: Cloud enabled devices.

2011-10-08 Thread dsh
That finding illustrates that it is not only about application domains but actually the questions we were asking so far do qualify for research topics. I am for instance are interested in research questions such as how could computing cycles be offloaded on embedded devices from the main CPU to

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-09-05 Thread dsh
, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:14 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: ... My attempt to provide an overview what works on FreeBSD (8.2

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-15 Thread dsh
Hi, looks like Qpid experiences a similar thread-local issue on OS X: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2206 On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:30 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Jean-Sebastien, the old SpiderMonkey port [10] already contains support for nspr - so that end

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-14 Thread dsh
Daniel On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:14 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: ... My attempt to provide an overview what works on FreeBSD (8.2) and what not: * autoconf, automake, libtool, doxygen, gcc can

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-11 Thread dsh
[7] [0] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=284897+0+current/freebsd-ports [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159658 [2] http://people.apache.org/~dsh/projects/fbsd-ports/spidermonkey185/ [3] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=343488+0+current/freebsd-ports [4] http

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-10 Thread dsh
Hi Jean-Sebastien, On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: That's what I meant when I mentioned 'convert usages of __thread to Posix thread TLS calls' in my previous post [1]. __thread works for me with GCC on Mac OS X (using the GCC build from

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-10 Thread dsh
wrote: On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:53 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Jean-Sebastien Delfino, some things I noticed during the configure process (I am using MacPorts): * I think it would help to point out in the INSTALL file that mozjs can be downloaded at - ftp://ftp.mozilla.org

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-10 Thread dsh
Hi Jean-Sebastien, On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for the link to js 185, I'll try it on Ubuntu, Redhat and Mac OS X too, happy to switch to it if it works on these systems, but I'd like to avoid installing it in the default system

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-09 Thread dsh
: I am planning to create a FreeBSD port for Apache Tuscany (native) cause I feel having to setup all of these dependencies is kind of daunting. Cheers Daniel On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:35 PM, dsh daniel.hais

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-09 Thread dsh
Looks like OS X does not support thread local storage. I.e. __thread causes an compile error and thus one would not need to use --enable-threads or would need to disable them explicitely using --disable-threads. Is this a known issue on OS X? Cheers Daniel On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:53 AM, dsh

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-07 Thread dsh
recently because they allow to have all those different setups and configurations :) Cheers Daniel On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 1:52 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: The configure.ac language is a little

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-06 Thread dsh
Hi Jean-Sebastien, if you like I could take a look at LLVM/clang. From my point of view it not only integrates more nicely with Xcode but you would as well get rid of dynamically linking against things like libgcc* which sometimes triggers licensing discussions if talking to attorneys. If you

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-06 Thread dsh
Btw, concerning OpenCL I recently found this IBM research project [1]. It not only abstracts OpenCL but OpenMP, CUDA and FPGA programming too. So you don't have to deal with low level library programming. Just thought I share that link with you (I am not recommending using that project as part of

Re: Fun with LevelDB, LLVM and OpenCL

2011-08-06 Thread dsh
jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:14 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Jean-Sebastien, if you like I could take a look at LLVM/clang. From my point of view it not only integrates more nicely with Xcode but you would as well get rid of dynamically linking against

Re: [GSoC 2011] Implement support for SCA components written in Scala

2011-04-14 Thread dsh
I liked that presentation too: http://www.parleys.com/#id=10sl=1st=5 Cheers Daniel On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Florian Moga moga@gmail.com wrote: Simon, Guilherme, The Programming in Scala, First Edition book written by Martin Odersky (creator of Scala) has been published for free

Re: Do Tuscany developers use FindBugs?

2011-01-26 Thread dsh
Didn't know that you were not aware of the fact that there are Eclipse plug-ins available for FindBugs, PMD etc. :) At IBM I am additionally using Rational Software Analyzer which can be used inside in Eclipse and it as well integrates into the CI system of Rational Team Concert. Cheers Daniel

Re: Do Tuscany developers use FindBugs?

2011-01-25 Thread dsh
I would say TDD and static code analysis are complementary. Cheers Daniel On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Mike Edwards mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com wrote: On 24/01/2011 18:13, César Couto wrote: Dear developers, I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am

Re: Do Tuscany developers use FindBugs?

2011-01-25 Thread dsh
code. We don't enforce these tools at maven build level. Developers are welcome to use them locally though. Raymond Feng Sent from my iPhone On Jan 25, 2011, at 5:33 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: I would say TDD and static code analysis are complementary. Cheers Daniel

Re: Do Tuscany developers use FindBugs?

2011-01-25 Thread dsh
oopps s/advantage/disadvantage/ or otherwise the whole sentence does not make much sense :) Cheers Daniel On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:42 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: I use FindBugs, Checkstyle, PMD and other static code analysis tools on my own where applicable while working

Re: Do Tuscany developers use FindBugs?

2011-01-25 Thread dsh
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:42 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: I use FindBugs, Checkstyle, PMD and other static code analysis tools on my own where applicable while working on Apache or other projects

Re: Do Tuscany developers use FindBugs?

2011-01-25 Thread dsh
Out of curiosity - Don't we have a hosted version of Sonar at the ASF? That would make things easier... Cheers Daniel On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Mike Edwards mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com wrote: Agree, I