{RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

Passed with 6 +1 binding votes from +1 from Luciano Resende, Ramkumar R, Dan Becker, Raymond Feng, Simon Laws, Ant Elder +0 from Kevan Miller and no -1. On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: > > Hi, > > 1) I fixed the SAX2DOM AS

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, 1) I fixed the SAX2DOM ASL header. Thanks 2) I'm using JDK 6 on both Windows and Linux and I don't see any problems. OK. Good to know. 3) For the tools.jar issue, Kevan had a patch for http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-25

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: I noted that Kevan was +0, Are we going to need a new RC ? Not in my opinion. If I thought one was needed, I'd have voted -1... ;-) I think it's best to get the release out and keep moving. I'll see if I can figure out what's going on w

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

It all looks ok to me so +1 on RC3. ...ant On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please review and vote on the 2.0-M1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for > Java. > > The artifacts are available for review at: > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M1-RC3/

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

From: Kevan Miller > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:10 PM > To: dev@tuscany.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3) > > On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:44 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > Please review and vote on the 2.0-M1 release artifac

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

file to control if the tools.jar should be included. I'll check it in after I verify the result. Thanks, Raymond From: Kevan Miller Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:10 PM To: dev@tuscany.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3) On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:44

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:44 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: Please review and vote on the 2.0-M1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M1-RC3/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, th

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

ev=743809&view=rev > > Raymond > -- > From: "Dan Becker" > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:41 AM > To: > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3) > > > Luciano Resende wrote: >> >>&

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

"Dan Becker" Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:41 AM To: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3) Luciano Resende wrote: Please review and vote on the 2.0-M1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

Luciano Resende wrote: Please review and vote on the 2.0-M1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M1-RC3/ +1 from me. All samples seem to be working. -- Thanks, Dan Becker

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

Thanks for the fix Luciano, yeah I agree that others are minor issue that need not hold the release. I have missed to cast my vote in my previous note. Here's is my +1. On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Ramkumar R > wrote: > > Hi Luciano

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Ramkumar R wrote: > Hi Luciano, > > Things looks pretty good with RC3 with couple of minor corrections > required... > > - Missing RELEASE_NOTES and CHANGES file in the tag I think you meant the release folder. I have fixed, although I didn't think this was a req

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

Hi Luciano, Things looks pretty good with RC3 with couple of minor corrections required... - Missing RELEASE_NOTES and CHANGES file in the tag - Should all the samples in the binary distribution need to have pre-compiled jar files in target folder? - Not sure about this... Should we have "etc" fo

[VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 2.0-M1 (RC3)

Please review and vote on the 2.0-M1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M1-RC3/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, and the Maven staging repository. The releas