Besides static analysis tools, what do you think about starting to use a
code review tool? I've noticed https://reviews.apache.org/ but there was no
tuscany group. Is there something else available inside the ASF? Have you
used something else in the past? For me at least it would be really useful
t
Didn't know that you were not aware of the fact that there are Eclipse
plug-ins available for FindBugs, PMD etc. :)
At IBM I am additionally using Rational Software Analyzer which can be
used inside in Eclipse and it as well integrates into the CI system of
Rational Team Concert.
Cheers
Daniel
O
On 26/01/2011 10:23, Mike Edwards wrote:
On 24/01/2011 18:13, César Couto wrote:
Dear developers,
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
FindBugs bug finding tool.
Since I am planning to use Tuscany
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Mike Edwards
wrote:
> On 24/01/2011 18:13, César Couto wrote:
>>
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
>> making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
>> FindBugs bug finding tool.
>>
>>
On 24/01/2011 18:13, César Couto wrote:
Dear developers,
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
FindBugs bug finding tool.
Since I am planning to use Tuscany as a subject system in my research,
I wou
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:13 PM, dsh wrote:
>> Out of curiosity - Don't we have a hosted version of Sonar at the ASF?
>> That would make things easier...
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>
> AFAIK, it's still in progress, Gav had created the VM
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:13 PM, dsh wrote:
> Out of curiosity - Don't we have a hosted version of Sonar at the ASF?
> That would make things easier...
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
AFAIK, it's still in progress, Gav had created the VM couple weeks ago
and others were working on getting Sonar setup. Onc
Out of curiosity - Don't we have a hosted version of Sonar at the ASF?
That would make things easier...
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Mike Edwards
> wrote:
>>> Agree, I have been playing with Sonar, which provides vario
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Mike Edwards
wrote:
>> Agree, I have been playing with Sonar, which provides various metrics
>> and below you can find Tuscany 2.x (modules only) analysis.
>>
>> http://www.figueiredos.com:8080/sonar/project/index/195
>>
>>
It's back up again... server is not tot
On 25/01/2011 17:38, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:33 AM, dsh wrote:
I would say TDD and static code analysis are complementary.
Cheers
Daniel
Agree, I have been playing with Sonar, which provides various metrics
and below you can find Tuscany 2.x (modules only) analysis.
@Cesar Couto:
If I get it right (Luciano correct me if I am wrong) Sonar comes with
plug-ins for FindBugs, Checkstyle and PMD. So one could say it
aggregates commonly known static code analysis tools and thus uses
them complementary.
Proof: http://www.sonarsource.org/tag/findbugs/
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:42 AM, dsh wrote:
> I use FindBugs, Checkstyle, PMD and other static code analysis tools
> on my own where applicable while working on Apache or other projects.
> According to my experience, enforcing such tools for instance during a
> continuous integration build cycle h
oopps s/advantage/disadvantage/ or otherwise the whole sentence does
not make much sense :)
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:42 PM, dsh wrote:
> I use FindBugs, Checkstyle, PMD and other static code analysis tools
> on my own where applicable while working on Apache or other projects.
> A
I use FindBugs, Checkstyle, PMD and other static code analysis tools
on my own where applicable while working on Apache or other projects.
According to my experience, enforcing such tools for instance during a
continuous integration build cycle has the advantage that it a) breaks
the build if confi
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:33 AM, dsh wrote:
> I would say TDD and static code analysis are complementary.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
Agree, I have been playing with Sonar, which provides various metrics
and below you can find Tuscany 2.x (modules only) analysis.
http://www.figueiredos.com:8080/sonar/
Agree. I use it within Eclipse for developing Tuscany code once a while. It's
useful for better code.
We don't enforce these tools at maven build level. Developers are welcome to
use them locally though.
Raymond Feng
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 25, 2011, at 5:33 AM, dsh wrote:
> I would say T
I would say TDD and static code analysis are complementary.
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Mike Edwards
wrote:
> On 24/01/2011 18:13, César Couto wrote:
>>
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
>> making a study about the r
On 24/01/2011 18:13, César Couto wrote:
Dear developers,
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
FindBugs bug finding tool.
Since I am planning to use Tuscany as a subject system in my research,
I wou
Dear developers,
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
FindBugs bug finding tool.
Since I am planning to use Tuscany as a subject system in my research,
I would like to know if Tuscany's developers us
19 matches
Mail list logo
