Re: Questions about external policy attachment

2010-08-03 Thread Brent Daniel
I've fixed this now, but it was hiding a test case issue in POL_4019, so that test is failing now (in the attachTo attribute on the "BothIntents" policy set, interface.wsdl needs to be prefixed by "sca".) Brent On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Brent Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:12 A

Re: Questions about external policy attachment

2010-07-27 Thread Brent Daniel
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > Yeah, also isn't it the case that, as it's not actually checking what > the attachTo refers to, it could be throwing away the directly > attached policy when it's not required to do so? > Yes.. If there were two directly attached policy sets o

Re: Questions about external policy attachment

2010-07-27 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Brent Daniel wrote: > Sorry, no coffee yet this morning.. Was mixing intents and policy > sets, but the conclusion is still the same -- this code isn't correct. > > Brent > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Brent Daniel wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:51 AM,

Re: Questions about external policy attachment

2010-07-27 Thread Brent Daniel
Sorry, no coffee yet this morning.. Was mixing intents and policy sets, but the conclusion is still the same -- this code isn't correct. Brent On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Brent Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > >> >> 1/ A general spec question. Can you ex

Re: Questions about external policy attachment

2010-07-27 Thread Simon Laws
>> > > Right. My interpretation of the spec is that a policy set that is > externally attached to an element via any means results in ignoring > any directly attached policy sets. That would include the case where a > policy set is attached and then flowed down to another element. Yep, I'm with yo

Re: Questions about external policy attachment

2010-07-27 Thread Brent Daniel
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > > 1/ A general spec question. Can you externally attach a policy to a > component and expect it to be flowed down to the components services > and references. Our code does this at present. Yes, the policy set is inherited unless there is alre

Re: Questions about external policy attachment

2010-07-27 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > Hi > > I'm looking at why ASM_10002 is now failing. > > The reported cause is that a reference intent > ({http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/scatests/200903}Fred) is not > resolved. Here's the definition of the reference... > >       requir

Questions about external policy attachment

2010-07-27 Thread Simon Laws
Hi I'm looking at why ASM_10002 is now failing. The reported cause is that a reference intent ({http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/scatests/200903}Fred) is not resolved. Here's the definition of the reference... test:PolicySet1 is actually removed from the reference because the infra