Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache UIMA Java SDK 3.0.0-alpha released

On 5/15/2017 11:11 AM, Benjamin De Boe wrote: > Hi, > > David: FYI, we've been able to get our UIMACPP code to work with the UIMA > 3.0.0-alpha2 kit with just a rebuild. It's not that we're covering the entire > surface area, but at least the upgrade passed fine. This is great news :-), thank

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-5428) DUCC minimally support user log directory not in shared file system

Lou DeGenaro created UIMA-5428: -- Summary: DUCC minimally support user log directory not in shared file system Key: UIMA-5428 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5428 Project: UIMA I

Re: Extracting a type system definition from an XMI file

Hi, a collegue once tried that with the attached code. Can obviously not recreate the hierarchy but for some easy cases its fine. Best regards Markus Krug Am 15.05.2017 um 19:02 schrieb José Tomás Atria: I think Marshall is right, in the sense that you could recover "a" type system that w

Re: Extracting a type system definition from an XMI file

I think Marshall is right, in the sense that you could recover "a" type system that would allow for the observed features found in a serialized cas, but that resulting type system would be pretty useless, as it would have none of the type and hierarchy constraints of the original. But also, it wou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA uimaFIT 2.4.0 RC 1

Had a short look... found none of the typical problems like missing component or different resolution. Peter Am 15.05.2017 um 17:48 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho: > On 15.05.2017, at 17:36, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >> FAIL - jira-report >> - for some reason only one issue shows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA uimaFIT 2.4.0 RC 1

On 15.05.2017, at 17:36, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > > FAIL - jira-report > - for some reason only one issue shows up as fixed (UIMA-5113) > - the other and more important one (UIMA-5427) does not appear in the issue > report... Did anybody already run into this problem that some issue

Build failed in Jenkins: UIMA-uimaFIT_java9 #5

See Changes: [rec] [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration [rec] [maven-release-plugin] prepare release uimafit-2.4.0 [rec] No Jira. Update README and POM for new release. [rec] [UIMA-5113

Build failed in Jenkins: UIMA-uimaFIT_java9 » Apache UIMA uimaFIT - Parent #5

See Changes: [rec] [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration [rec] [maven-release-plugin] prepare release uimafit-2.4.0 [rec] [UIMA-5113] Upgrade to UIMA 2.10.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA uimaFIT 2.4.0 RC 1

OK - Compared SVN branch with source ZIP OK - Compiled from sources ZIP (empty Maven repo) OK - checked diff OK - Check README FAIL - jira-report - for some reason only one issue shows up as fixed (UIMA-5113) - the other and more important one (UIMA-5427) does not appear in the issue report..

[VOTE] Release Apache UIMA uimaFIT 2.4.0 RC 1

Hi all, this is a bugfix release (but upgrades to UIMA 2.10.0, that is why it's not 2.3.1): - Fixed bug: indexCovered should not return reference annotation - Upgrade to UIMA 2.10.0 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1140 SVN tag: https://s

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Apache UIMA Java SDK 3.0.0-alpha released

Hi, David: FYI, we've been able to get our UIMACPP code to work with the UIMA 3.0.0-alpha2 kit with just a rebuild. It's not that we're covering the entire surface area, but at least the upgrade passed fine. Marshall: Are there any plans for a new UIMACPP release? We'd especially like to see h

[jira] [Resolved] (UIMA-5113) Upgrade to UIMA 2.10.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho resolved UIMA-5113. -- Resolution: Fixed > Upgrade to UIMA 2.10.0 > -- > >

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-5113) Upgrade to UIMA 2.10.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho updated UIMA-5113: - Fix Version/s: (was: 2.5.0uimaFIT) 2.4.0uimaFIT > Up

[jira] [Resolved] (UIMA-5427) indexCovered should not return reference annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho resolved UIMA-5427. -- Resolution: Resolved > indexCovered should not return reference annotatio

Re: Extracting a type system definition from an XMI file

Hi, The xmi file would contain just a set of "examples" of the type system, right? And there would be nothing there that would indicate the type hierarchy, I think, although one might be able to heuristically guess at a possible hierarchy, if there were instances of types that were members of var

Build failed in Jenkins: UIMA-uimaFIT_java9 #4

See Changes: [rec] [UIMA-5427] indexCovered should not return reference annotation - Fix indexCovered to no longer return reference annotation - Improved JavaDoc - Added unit test

Build failed in Jenkins: UIMA-uimaFIT_java9 » Apache UIMA uimaFIT - Parent #4

See -- Established TCP socket on 37815 maven33-agent.jar already up to date maven33-interceptor.jar already up to date maven3-interceptor-commons.jar alread

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-5046) Faster indexCovered implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16010412#comment-16010412 ] Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-5046: -- Opened a new issue for

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-5427) indexCovered should not return reference annotation

Richard Eckart de Castilho created UIMA-5427: Summary: indexCovered should not return reference annotation Key: UIMA-5427 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5427 Project: UIMA