Extremely busy coding for double 11 now.
> 在 2017年11月5日,14:23,Adam Feng 写道:
>
> How's it going? We need to release a version as soon as Yoga is removed.
>
> Thanks.
> Adam Feng
>
> On 12 Oct 2017, 10:37 PM +0800, 申远 , wrote:
>> flex-grow is already supported by flex shorthand, and it’s possibl
How's it going? We need to release a version as soon as Yoga is removed.
Thanks.
Adam Feng
On 12 Oct 2017, 10:37 PM +0800, 申远 , wrote:
> flex-grow is already supported by flex shorthand, and it’s possible to
> support flex-shrink in later version.
> While, flex-basis is the same as main size whi
flex-grow is already supported by flex shorthand, and it’s possible to support
flex-shrink in later version.
While, flex-basis is the same as main size which is supported already except
for percent value. I think support percent unit is a huge, duplicate and
unnecessary work for most CSS style,
Should we consider about layout percent unit, flex-shrink, flex-grow,
flexBasis, and baseline in align-Items ?
2017-10-12 16:54 GMT+08:00 申远 :
> Dear all,
>
> I’m considering replacing Facebook/Yoga to a new layout system based on
> Google/Flexbox due to Facebook’s additional patent issue. Beside
Dear all,
I’m considering replacing Facebook/Yoga to a new layout system based on
Google/Flexbox due to Facebook’s additional patent issue. Besides, this new
layout system will provide some new css style like order, etc.
Any advise for the new layout system?
PS: I need some advise about the na