Re: Replace Facebook/Yoga with a new implementation.

2017-11-05 Thread 申远
Extremely busy coding for double 11 now. > 在 2017年11月5日，14:23，Adam Feng 写道： > > How's it going？ We need to release a version as soon as Yoga is removed. > > Thanks. > Adam Feng > > On 12 Oct 2017, 10:37 PM +0800, 申远 , wrote: >> flex-grow is already

Re: Replace Facebook/Yoga with a new implementation.

2017-11-05 Thread Adam Feng
How's it going？ We need to release a version as soon as Yoga is removed. Thanks. Adam Feng On 12 Oct 2017, 10:37 PM +0800, 申远 , wrote: > flex-grow is already supported by flex shorthand, and it’s possible to > support flex-shrink in later version. > While, flex-basis is

Re: Replace Facebook/Yoga with a new implementation.

2017-10-12 Thread 申远
flex-grow is already supported by flex shorthand, and it’s possible to support flex-shrink in later version. While, flex-basis is the same as main size which is supported already except for percent value. I think support percent unit is a huge, duplicate and unnecessary work for most CSS

Re: Replace Facebook/Yoga with a new implementation.

2017-10-12 Thread xing zhang
Should we consider about layout percent unit, flex-shrink, flex-grow, flexBasis, and baseline in align-Items ? 2017-10-12 16:54 GMT+08:00 申远 : > Dear all, > > I’m considering replacing Facebook/Yoga to a new layout system based on > Google/Flexbox due to Facebook’s

Replace Facebook/Yoga with a new implementation.

2017-10-12 Thread 申远
Dear all, I’m considering replacing Facebook/Yoga to a new layout system based on Google/Flexbox due to Facebook’s additional patent issue. Besides, this new layout system will provide some new css style like order, etc. Any advise for the new layout system? PS: I need some advise about the